lol thats a great idea... More friends 40% slower...Guess getting it running on more platforms would be easierPS: that was sarcasm in there :)On 10/9/06,
david reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recorded this earlier today - thought people would like
Yes its possible with some minor effort.You need Visual Studio 2005, perl, awk...Open a CLI and navigate to your source tree.Get the latest cvtdsp.pl from the svn server.and run cvtdsp.pl -2005 You open
Apache.dsw and convert it to a sln via the IDE.You then set it to build release.Then go to the
I'll try that later tonight... any disavantages while doing so?On 11/2/06, Ivan Ristic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On 11/2/06, Jorge Schrauwen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes its possible with some minor effort. ... Other modules i found that work fine: mod_auth_xml mod_macro mod_security
1.9.4 (2.0
well wrowe warned me it was buggy at best :)On 11/2/06, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:I'll try that later tonight... any disavantages while doing so?
On 11/2/06, Ivan Ristic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On 11/2/06, Jorge Schrauwen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes its possible with some minor
I'm working on a small utility for windows to remotly start/stop/restart an apache server.
In the future I'd like to add support for viewing logs end editing remote config files.
Feedback from the few Alpha testers i have is great.
But here is the question.
1) for security i send command +
while we are on the subject to of apr...May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.JorgeOn 11/8/06,
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should start
I'd be willing to test the tarballs on win x64 (32-bit and 64-bit) and on vista (32-bit).
is this still compatible with the current trunk?
If so maybe it can be reactivated for trunk and 2.2?
From what i gather from the info it seems interesting enough.
On 11/20/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
I don't think that the problem is mod_perl, as much
If its in the first week of Dec, I can do a test build on Win32 and Win64
If its mid Dec I can't due to exames.
On 11/28/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved,
On 12/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Jeff:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative
but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
I voted -1
Doesn't seem to work for me. Compiles without errors just the regular
warnings.
But when I try to run any of the binaries I get:
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7573/errorvs2005jp1.jpg
I'm using visual studio 2005 as always. Following the same steps I've been
doing since 2.2.0
I tried with
I'll give it another whack later today but from IDE this time.
I'll keep you posted
On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes mail:Apache@geleia.net wrote:
No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
studio
2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the manifest
where exactly did you add this in the Makefile?
After some searching it does seem that the errors I' mgetting are related to
missing or wrong manifest files.
On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes mail:Apache@geleia.net wrote:
No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
studio
2005
This is a wild guess but
Line 82 of makefile.win:
!IF EXIST(srclib\zlib)
in the win-src packaged the zlib and openssl folders exist without the files
being in there.
I guess this broke it.
On 1/7/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me that the autodetection which used to
Do note that not all users that will chose the SSL package will know how to
correctly fill in the fields. My experience tells me if there is a package
with XYZ and without most chose it with XYZ even if they don't need it.
So if there is a dialog in the installer that would ask for the
On 1/10/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Do note that not all users that will chose the SSL package will know how
to correctly fill in the fields.
s/not all/a small minority of/
Do not underestimate user stupidity ;) ok maybe the number won't
On 1/11/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
./configure; make; make install
We don't deposit a certificate today for Unix. After considering
this a bit
more, I agree with jerenkrantz.
True... if you don't enable mod_ssl by default and add a note in the
conf
On 2/14/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally believe the push for 3.0 needs to be focused on how to
create a positive scratch your own itch for most of the developer. So,
in that spirit, what bothers everyone else about 2.x?
- Things I find lacking in 2.x are like you said
On 2/19/07, Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:26:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
As long as we first teach httpd/Subversion how to deal with all of the
spelling mistakes from us trying to spell out Dutch words. I want
something easy to remember *and* type!
Alternatively a different auth module could read and extra field that
point the user to a different root directory.
sjorge == /server/host/www.blackdot.be
wrowe == /server/host/apache.org
...
this way the user name would be free of @'s :)
Downside would be:
1. multiple domains can't have the
to take this one step deeper into the vhost concept and vhost
specific permissions, though.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Alternatively a different auth module could read and extra field that
point the user to a different root directory.
sjorge == /server/host/www.blackdot.be
wrowe == /server/host
If by interaction you mean access a ssl mysql server from php, asp,
coldfusion...
then no, that would require the php module to be compiled with ssl.
If your talking about modules like mod_auth_mysql then no again since
that specific module would need to support ssl. To my knowledge there
isn't
What does a reverse lookup of 192.168.200.180 on the server give as hostname?
On 4/27/07, Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:55:47PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
Just to eliminate the obvious, have you actually checked the
access_log to verify that the IP
I had 2.2.4 working on Vista RC2 but it has expired (no cash to upgrade :p)
I did have UAC off and I installed it as I usually do by compiling the
source and running httpd.exe -k install.
I've had someone report that opening and admin console (cmd.exe with
admin rights) works aswel. But you
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision.
[ ] Our httpd wiki is open to external resources
On 5/24/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache wiki is not some democratic exercise like wikipedia where
we need to treat everyone equally. We are a meritocracy, not a
democracy, even on the wiki. Certain people (like Rich) have earned
the right to make final decisions about what
On 5/24/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe one rule that states that {INSERT AUTHERIZED PEOPLE HERE} can
make a decision on a dispute. Example: some external link that provide
bad/false or not prefured information
On 6/17/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
So is there any time frame for official binaries to be released in
64-bit? the 2.2 tree seems to compile fine without any problems. I
know there is no noticeable speed improvement only a slight memory
usage
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
One major issue is;
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/459847/100/0/threaded
where MS's response was entirely unsatisfactory w.r.t. POSIX compliance.
Does MS ever follow standards? I know most
I've update my page:
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries
Would this be sufficient?
It is a know problem...
I'm not 100% but I though wrowe fixed it for 2.2.5... so wait after the TR
(which should be this weekend from what I gather) and give it another go
On 8/10/07, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a set of makefiles for building apache httpd 2.2.4 with
@if exist %a.manifest mt.exe -nologo -manifest
%a.manifest -outputresource:%a;2
FOR /R %a in (*.so) DO @if exist %a.manifest mt.exe -nologo -manifest
%a.manifest -outputresource:%a;2
Some people reported it working over at apachelounge.com... I had no sucess
with it.
On 8/10/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL
/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/httpd.dsp
does indeed have manifest stuff in it. So fingers crossed for 2.2.5...
Thanks,
Steve
--
*From:* Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 10 August 2007 12:20
*To:* dev@httpd.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Building with Visual
On 8/24/07, Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jorge:
Should I change these names to other things too to be safe? If so any
ideas?
I can see ApacheMobile being something like ServerOnAStick or something.
But
if I need to change them I have no idea what to call
#
# #
# By Jorge Schrauwen 2006 #
# http://www.blackdot.be #
What is it?
-
HTTP Server On USB is a self contained webserver.
Based on Apache HTTPD Server
give an answer to that in other message.
Kind Regards
Jorge
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Mail prc-at-apache.org but not reply yet but I'm in the process of
renaming all the stuff,
If they don't agree with the new name I'll do it again.
--
~Jorge
On 8/30/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 8/30/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the delay (with my PRC hat on). You should see
a reply as we speak :)
No worries, but while I have attention let me
and the current version is
rather buggy.
I someday wish to work on it again but I just don't have the time to do it
now.
So if there is interest in this I'd like to donate the code that I have to
the ASF.
Sadly I didn't know C back then (and still don't) so its all written in
Delphi.
Jorge
On 9/4/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise
On 9/5/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote
I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi file to
work.
I get 500 and error_log has this.
[Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14] Premature end of
script headers: printenv.pl
[Wed Sep 05 20:50:24 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14] Premature end of
script
On 9/5/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I don't have any cgi scripts so I tried to get the printenv test-cgi
file to work.
I get 500 and error_log has this.
[Wed Sep 05 20:44:36 2007] [error] [client 87.66.74.14
What exectly is not working in mod_perl? my limited mod_perl config is
working fine.
On 9/5/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also mod_perl is not working here with Win32. No indication in the logs.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On 9/6/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASF hates Windows users
comments??
I usually prefure not to poke my nose into other peoples discussions but...
my experience with the ASF is that they threat windows users equally than
linux/unix/whatever users.
The problem is windows users
I tried to compiled mod_fcgid myself to see if I can replicate the problem.
I can't even compiled it against 2.2.6.
I get a lot of link errors agains APR.
--- complete buildlog availble on request but nothing odd until this ---
1fcgid_spawn_ctl.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
On 9/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have.
Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling
now an as I told before, we have to wait.
Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working
On 9/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I tried to compiled mod_fcgid myself to see if I can replicate the
problem.
I can't even compiled it against 2.2.6.
I get a lot of link errors agains APR.
Silly question, did you add libapr-1.lib, libaprutil
Any more info how you got it to work with apxs?
~ Jorge
On 9/7/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
win32/vc8 +1 (not that it makes much of a difference at this point :))
I've gotten mod_fcgid built against it (though apxs-win32-0.6 is still
not doing -llibhttpd -llibapr-1 and
before -c mod_fgid.c ...
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Any more info how you got it to work with apxs?
~ Jorge
On 9/7/07, *Issac Goldstand* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
win32/vc8 +1 (not that it makes much of a difference at this point
:))
I've gotten
Well since after messing about with mod_fcgid a bit I finally got it to
compile.
I tried printenv.pl with this configuration:
LoadModule fcgid_module modules/mod_fcgid.so
Location /fcgid
SetHandler fcgid-script
Options ExecCGI
allow from all
/Location
as by the doc here:
it works fine.
I'm now going to try more complicated examples. If they fail aswel (as I
presume they will)
Try to get you a debug dump... not sure when though busy weekend and then
first week of school.
On 9/7/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got it to compile via the included projected
I got it to compile via the included projected manually adding aditional
depedancys on libhttp, libapr-1 and libaprutil-1 did the trick.
Now I need to find out how it is suposed to work adn see if it works or not
On 9/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote
Didn't even notice... I usually take the tar.gz source and add in apr-iconv
myself then run lineends.pl that is included in srclib/apr/build/, I also
run cvtdsp.pl -2005 on there before I start.
I didn't even seen a -win32-src.zip at that time.
On 9/7/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Ok basic example as stated here:
http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/configuration.htm#regular%20fastcgi
makes the server spit out these again:
[Fri Sep 07 17:49:51 2007] [error] [client 192.168.1.4
http
Yeah I figured it out a bit later and it indeed seems broke. Not sure whats
wrong though I posted a debug log + user dump yesterday.
On 9/8/07, Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Any more info how you got it to work with apxs?
This works for me
On 9/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic,
they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other
adverse effects.
Yes, exactly.
to be released before it (and, of course, will
also contain the changes).
Steve
--
*From:* Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 20 September 2007 09:37
*To:* dev@httpd.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?
I found ActivePerl
Again, Steffens contributions would be very welcomed *here* if this
whole AL thing were just not that misleading - hey, with some effort
he could e.g. help out constructively by building these binaries in a
transparent and documented way *here* and we could even distribute
them from
easier for me :)
On 9/27/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2007 9:22 AM, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I could provide x64 binaries if there is interest in them. I usually
push
them out to my site within a week of the source release.
I'm not 100% sure my
On 9/28/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So with Jorge's and help from a few others, 2.2.6 builds quite nicely at
the command line. To make the transition to the GUI requires some other
steps, and I'm hoping these are simpler with 2.2.7 if I have a whole
weekend to work them
On 9/28/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So with Jorge's and help from a few others, 2.2.6 builds quite
nicely at
the command line. To make the transition to the GUI requires
On 10/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boyle Owen wrote:
Might it be an idea for 2.2.7?
I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on httpd.a.o,
or our www.apache.org. +1.
(Especially since the datestamps of our tarballs are several days prior
to each
On 10/2/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 08:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, we could do:
o Apache 1.3 and 2.0 deprecated
As part of the support community, I'd like to have this defined pretty
clearly.
I presume it can't mean no more bug fixes or security
very nice... do include the last paragraph :)
On 10/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
Actually that statement is too narrow; What if
On 10/8/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it
really experimental, or is experimental considered a
I'd like to give some input on this aswel.
Has the compatibility been tested between MSVC80 and MSVC80Free binary -
module compilations?
I'd like to do some testing on that but my hardware doesn't allow for a vm
at my dorm at the moment.
On 10/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The documentation is indeed confusing at times, especially when using
vs.net2005.
You can poke around here if you like
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/x64 its a bit out of
date (just don't change the platform to x64).
wrowe:
I'm going to redo the tutorial and place it on
On Nov 14, 2007 3:06 PM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people prefer). Can
Hi all,
Afther some hours of searching for a way to compile
HTTPD 2.2.0 on Visual Studio 2005 I managed to compile it with zlib and openssl.
I then booted into My XP Pro x64 to see if i could build a Win64 binary.
I have succeded... well -openssl that is.
I did some minor testing and every
In case anyone is curious, it's trivial. Open Apache.dsw creating Apache.sln,
create a new project flavor x86, choose the existing project flavor win32 as
it's starting point, and then let VisualStudio do it's thing.
You may also wish to add /D WINNT to the apr / libapr components compile
Same as with the unix source,
accept the mod_charset_lite
~Jorge
So no-one is interested in testing?
How is Apache 64bit on other systems? Did it give a preformance boost?
~Jorge
Or you could just build the released unix source on windows.ALthough you need to do some tweaking to be able to do it.~Jorge
There aren't any x64 binaries yet...I'de be willing to create them if needed.But what is nececary for the msi installer?~ Jorge
Ahh, I don't have Installshield 10, It aint cheap either
:/
Eliminating the dependency on the MS dll's is possible in
a win32 build so I think i can mange that to in a win64
build :)
The installer should basicly only check if it is
installing on Windows XP Pro x64 or Windows 2003 Server
first - the ASF only distributes binaries built by project members; thatdoesn't prevent you or anyone of offering an independent binary build.Yes, i know that... but since Apache on x64 will probeby bring a lot of user asking questions here,Although it isn't an official ASF distribution.I
Hi,I would like to have some information how i would create a logprogram.I've create a console application in delphi that sends stdin to a parent program,That works fine... although i get like 4-5 of these open, and they don't shutdown when apache does.Does apache send a specific termination
So a Readline while not EOF should work then...I'll give that a shot.Jorge,
keep in mind that the logger won't end until the write end of the pipeis closed, and that includes both the currently running workers, the parent,and it's own copy (!) if you kept one open. Be sure your logger only
Done. I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts working now. Also no build error apu_version anymore. All tests passed here, including mod_perl and other common mods.
Steffen http://www.apachelounge.comYeah it builds fine with APR and APR-util trunk, nothing was needed
Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply totaled if trying as Win64.Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...I noted that i didn't have any SDK's installed because if you use the free edition of
VC.net 2005 you need Platform
was copied in whole from a working 2.2.0 install
Steffen- Original Message -From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:55Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box
On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO. Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed underdarwin x686 and win64.so don't necessarily expect
2.2.1 to build win64clean yet out
On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply totaled if trying as Win64.Yup, mostly hopeless back then. Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.
Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea
I was wondering this too while parsing htpasswd files in php.all others have a identified in front to see what encrypt it used...Why doesn't crypt have one? On 4/10/06,
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Kew wrote: Whilst this is clearly an edge-case, is it necessarily true that
I've got a lot of poeple (aka 4 sofar) mailing me (no idea why really) where the tarball's are.Maybe the list avaible in [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be posted on the website aswel?I'm talking about the list that sais which releases where tagged, rolled, GA,... and when.
JorgeOn 4/11/06, William A.
Thats the problem i think plain and crypt both don't have a Identifier tag,The since the script will be used on win only i went for always plain text.Can emulaion crypt on platforms that don't support it? or will this be to slow?
On 4/11/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge
I had a wild idea not so long ago to make a sort of simple web interface for apache.It is far from done, but what i got working (not mutch since i only put like 5 hours in it) i showed to some server admin's i know and they where very entausiatic.
I got sort of a log manager working fine in
unzipped it.the user name and password is: httpd/dev
~ JorgeOn 4/15/06, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a wild idea not so long ago to make a sort of simple web interface for apache.It is far from done, but what i got working (not mutch since i only put like 5 hours in it) i showed
Webmin doesn't work on windows,My idea is with this to be for HTTPD only and provide a rich interface for managing an httpd 2.0/2.2 server via a webbrowser.The first version won't have a config edtor in there but I'm planning on having things like a gui like editor for basic settings in there at
I've seen a mod_snmp somewhere:http://www.mod-snmp.com/mod_snmp.htmldon't know how if its free and for what version though.
On 4/17/06, Jeff McAdams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote: ideas so far (half joking): - mod_ircd - implementing a UDP protocol - a caching module implement CML
Very interesting, lot of potention there...Might put mine on hold then... and see what comes of this.On 4/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Since there doesn't seem to be mutch interest in this i'll post what i
got in hopes of attracting some more
Build using vs.net 2005 pro from GUI,Working fine.
that is without deflate and ssl?Still having problems compiling it to win64 with those enabled.On 4/26/06, Mladen Turk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing httpd
2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util 1.2.7.+1Tested on WIN64/x86_64 and WIN32Regards,Mladen.--
wait... did you do a 32bit binary on a win64 system or a 64bit binary?On 4/26/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Jorge Schrauwen wrote: that is without deflate and ssl?No, it's with
zlib-1.2.3 and openssl-0.9.8a Still having problems compiling it to win64 with those enabled.What
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: wait... did you do a 32bit binary on a win64 system or a 64bit binary? Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition
Service Pack 1 AMD Athlon 3600 2.20 GHz, 2 GB of RAM Miscrosoft Visual Studio 2005 Version
aah i'm having some problems with openssl...they seemed to be vs 2005 related... resolved those buy a small patch :) all works fine now!Now for addon modules :)On 4/26/06,
Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
interesting! I'll give that a shot once i get my machine formatetd it had a crash 2
Well i can't vote but since no-one seem to be replying...I've installed it on:OS: Windows XP Pro x46Server: httpd 2.2.2 (self compiled)I tested a few ASP.net sample I found on the net and all worked.
On 7/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build 2004 of mod_aspdotnet is prepared
I'm pretty sure i compiled mine with IP V6 and it doesn't show for me aswel.SO just test it and see if it worksOn 7/10/06, Warren Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi, Am I mistaken or does the supplied downloadable version of Apache
2.2.2not support IPV6?C:\Program Files\Apache Software
- WarrenFrom: Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 6:53 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSubject: Re: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?I'm pretty sure i compiled mine with IP V6 and it doesn't show for me aswel.
SO just test
On 7/12/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to adjust srclib/apr/include/apr.hw appropriately to enable IPV6.Once enabled, apr/httpd would fail to load on a non-IPV6 box.BillWait... so if i uncommned that IPv6 should work but IPv4 would be broke?
Or both will work but the
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
