Oh, I hate to get more email that I just delete as soon as it comes
in, but should we start sending out STATUS mailings for httpd 2.1 (or
rather the stable branch for httpd 2.0)?
Does anyone actually read these things though?
How about switching it to sending out a simple email that points to
--On Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:35 AM +0200 Tikka, Sami
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should the check for conn-aborted flag be added into proxy_http.c?
No, I'd prefer not. The core_output_filter should be returning the
error code. The fact that it is returning APR_SUCCESS when there was
an
--On Sunday, December 8, 2002 7:09 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -1691,6 +1693,18 @@
c-child_cleanup = child_cleanup;
c-next = p-cleanups;
p-cleanups = c;
+if(magic_cleanup) {
+ if(!magic_cleanup(data))
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, NULL,
--On Sunday, December 8, 2002 3:16 PM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
while cleaning up the 2.1 auth docs, some things bubbled up, that
are worth to patch, imho :) If all patches are applied, applying
them in the described order should work. But before a general
question: What's the
--On Saturday, December 7, 2002 8:54 AM -0800 Aaron Bannert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--includes)
if test $location = installed; then
flags=$flags -I$includedir $INCLUDES
elif test $location = source; then
flags=$flags -I$APU_SOURCE_DIR/include $INCLUDES
else
--On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:23 PM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My proposed changes are:
- Create each top-level request pool as a free-standing pool,
rather than a subpool of the connection pool.
- After generating the response, don't destroy the request pool.
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:28 AM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the connection is aborted after the metadata bucket is
pushed into the output filter chain, it would be the core
output filter's job to consume and destroy all remaining
buckets until it had processed the
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:45 AM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, we definitely need to do that cleanup in core_output_filter,
because that's the only code that's guaranteed to still be runnable
by the time we detect the aborted connection. The handler may have
finished
--On Friday, December 20, 2002 12:30 PM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
especially in the case of a proxy. Creating a response pool
will work, but that doubles the amount of memory that the server
must devote to a given request (one pool for request, one for
response).
IMHO, there
--On Saturday, December 21, 2002 10:00 AM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 02:05, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Saying a response pool 'doubles' the memory is an absolute
non-starter. Back that up, please. If you're meaning the
additional 8kb minimum
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:13:25PM -0800, Xiaodong Shen wrote:
Hi there,
I am playing with mod_deflate that comes with 2.0.43, it works nice for
Accept-Encoding: gzip, however it always returns the identity version of
the requested resource if Accept-Encoding: deflate is provided in the
--On Saturday, December 28, 2002 6:14 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the two conditional branches simply have to be swapped. Or better
we could remove the else-branch and put the disabled-check before
the 'if'. Or...?
I like the second option.
if engine is disabled
decline
--On Saturday, December 28, 2002 10:58 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm. what's the general strategy? leaving non-critical bugs in
(older versions ;-) or decide for every case, what should be done?
I think it should be decided on a case-by-case basis. For 2.0, we
have the
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 8:31 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -239,6 +256,11 @@
apr_bucket_brigade *bb, *proc_bb;
} deflate_ctx;
+#define LeaveNote(type, value) \
+if (c-note##type##Name) \
+apr_table_setn(r-notes, c-note##type##Name, \
+
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 7:21 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, although $user:$realm semantically _is_ the key, that causes
the problem, that mod_authz_dbm won't support it (it currently
doesn't support digest authentication anyway). What would be the
best variant?
-
--On Monday, January 06, 2003 16:58:24 -0500 Greg Ames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what's the advantage of copying all these files rather than just
leaving AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR pointing to APR's build dir?
You don't need srclib/{apr,apr-util} present to build httpd. You can use
an installed
--On Monday, January 06, 2003 14:10:55 -0800 Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The other thing that could happen is to enable locking services *only*
when the DAVGenericLockDB directive is present. However, that will change
mod_dav a bit, as it assumes that locking *is* available if the hooks
--On Tuesday, January 07, 2003 22:02:19 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gregames2003/01/07 14:02:19
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES configure.in
Log:
switch back to using srclib/apr/build for AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR so DSOs can
be built with libtool 1.4.
This is
--On Wednesday, January 8, 2003 7:32 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem on 2.0 with this proper fix is that make fails later
on if you don't have srclib/apr, so such a change doesn't seem
helpful.
Details please? -- justin
--On Wednesday, January 8, 2003 7:54 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I posted yesterday, generation of exports.c is busted without
srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util.
If you can get it to work with just the buildconf change, I'd love
to see it.
Well, it doesn't work if you don't
--On Wednesday, January 8, 2003 9:43 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry for being dense, but please clarify:
What patch do you suggest to apply to STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE2, and will
the following then work?
httpd-2.0/buildconf r1.29. Then, the configure.in patch that was
--On Wednesday, January 08, 2003 18:09:18 -0500 Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little confused by the rest of the diff, though, which a dozen
other lines being replaced with themselves. What's up with that?
Line endings being morphed perhaps? -- justin
--On Thursday, January 9, 2003 5:05 AM + Colm MacCarthaigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- /src/info-systems/httpd-2.0.43/server/listen.c.orig Tue Jan 7
16:13:53 2003 +++ /src/info-systems/httpd-2.0.43/server/listen.c
Tue Jan 7 16:16:09 2003 @@ -184,7 +184,13 @@
#if APR_HAS_SO_ACCEPTFILTER
--On Thursday, January 9, 2003 11:07 AM -0500 Greg Ames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just to be sure everybody is on the same page, is there a
srclib/apr[-util]/ under httpd in the test above at any point?
Only when buildconf is run. The resulting tarball should not require
srclib/apr[-util].
--On Thursday, January 09, 2003 16:51:54 -0500 Greg Ames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more weirdness. I'm trying to verify that there is some way to get
Apache to build with apr apr-util preinstalled outside of httpd. So
far I've seen:
* apr-util's configure dies with
configure: error: cannot
--On Saturday, January 11, 2003 8:07 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ap_finalize_request_protocol covers all the other cases, by
checking r-sent_eos. My question is why not always add the eos in
ap_finalize_request_protocol()?
ap_finalize_request_protocol() is a last resort to
--On Saturday, January 11, 2003 9:13 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My simple document patch is a great example of something that could
be handled by someone who doesn't have to be an expert in
httpd-2.0. It's expected that a new committer may need to do some
--On Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:50 PM -0500 Joe Schaefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me like his email client munged the patch- spurious
leading spaces, column wrap, etc. Bad Mozilla.
Is this one any better?
Patch committed. Thanks! -- justin
--On Monday, January 13, 2003 1:13 AM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hmm, I'd like to move the ident code out of core into a separate
module, say mod_ident, since it's a feature, which is hardly
used in more than 1% of the cases, where the apache httpd will be
used. But before doing
--On Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:32 AM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to let someone review before committing, because it's at
least a bunch of core changes.
Looks good upon cursory review. I think we could optimize some of
the socket calls (short read/write cases),
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:09 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another question: I guess, the change does require an MMN bump,
doesn't it?
Well, I'm not real sure if we consider core_dir_config a part of our
public structures. I really don't see why a module would be
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 9:59 AM +0200 Graham Leggett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were to change mod_auth_ldap to use the new authz/authn system
in v2.1, I have to split mod_auth_ldap into mod_authn_ldap (the
is-password-correct part) and mod_authz_ldap (group-membership
part). Am I
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 9:32 PM +0100 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
Compiles and runs on Darwin. +1.
This is so ridiculously overdue, it isn't
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:50 PM -0800 Greg Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't 1.4.3 needed for MacOS compatibility, and maybe one of those
fool IBM operating systems?
And, that fool Sun one, too. =) I haven't consistently seen the
problem that forced Subversion to require libtool
--On Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:33 PM +0100 Yuriy Pasichnyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the problem is quite generic so instead of
hacking/modifying mod_dav I was thinking of writing separate apache
module/filter that can be reused by other people as well.
Yeah, WebDAV has a slight
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:10 AM -0500 Ben Hyde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some parties will recall that this repository is a minimalist pop3
server that stands on the apr and httpd code. Ryan was it's
primary author. Following up on some discussions in other
venues... What do people
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:54 AM +0200 Graham Leggett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_ldap is a connection pool and query cache, and can be reused by
other apache modules that require ldap, such as a potential
DAV-ldap module, or a proxy_ldap module, so no - I'd say a
combination would be a
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by
using it to do simply/do some clever apache/tomcat connection
pooling.
For that, you should use apr_reslist_t. IIRC, it was written for
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 13:19:51 -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem to solve is that run-time linking is not enabled
for DSOs built with apxs+gcc on AIX... somehow libtool does the
right thing with apxs+native-compiler, but a lot of folks are
trying to use gcc and
--On Friday, January 24, 2003 6:29 PM +0100 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To avoid usage of the old script, can I get rid of it? If yes,
I'll also update our how-to-release document.
+1. Toss it. -- justin
--On Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:11 AM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
backport from 2.1: allow RewriteEngine Off even if Options
-FollowSymlinks
hmm, how is it? Is a fulfilled 2.0 backport vote sufficient to port
it back to 1.3 or would I need
--On Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:43 PM +0100 Harrie Hazewinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3)Why for instance, could this not stay as a seperate module??
The case that can be made for folding it in is that there is no
community currently around mod_pop3. If people were to step up and
be
--On Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:23 PM + Francis Daly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/* res_info is used when merging res_list */
+typedef struct res_info {
+int *range;
+apr_table_t *tab;
+} res_info;
I think this is the wrong data structure to be using here. A table
doesn't make a
--On Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:48 PM +0100 Günter Knauf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see apr_arch_inherit.h in include/arch/*/
Thats a useless answer. I want to see a .c that implements whats
defined in a .h.
No, it's not useless. I'd suggest actually reading the files Thom
pointed you at.
--On Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:55 PM +0100 Günter Knauf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an API for getting the MPM which is in use??
Not the specific MPM per se, but if you look in ap_mpm.h, you'll see
that you can query the properties of the running MPM. -- justin
--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 00:48:43 +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Cool thing in general. But shouldn't we consider a pluggable
mod_autoindex instead? I'm thinking of something similar to mod_dav:
mod_autoindex - base, contains all the display stuff and an interface for
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 23:55:29 + Thom May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+if [ ! -d $apr_src_dir -o ! -f $apr_src_dir/build/apr_common.m4 ];
then echo
-echo You don't have a srclib/apr/ subdirectory. Please get one:
+echo You don't have a copy of the apr source. Please
--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:54 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately I haven't been tracking warnings in 2.1-dev lately so
I didn't see this until it was merged...
Untested!
Um, I guess. What exactly was the warning?
Boy, it'd be easier to review if you used
--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:43 AM + Thom May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyhow, -nless patch attached; the output isn't as pretty.
-Thom
Applied. Thanks! -- justin
by: Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reviewed by:Justin Erenkrantz (with minor stylistic nit)
Revision ChangesPath
1.239 +5 -5 httpd-2.0/configure.in
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/configure.in
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16593
This bug states that a PUT with an If-Match condition to a mod_dav
resource always fails.
The problem is that the set_headers mod_dav hook isn't necessarily
called for dav_method_{put, post, etc, etc, etc}. It is called for
GET though
--On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 10:09 AM -0600 William A. Rowe,
Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a bug in the way Apache autoconf's... OpenSSL and OpenLDAP
should never be linked to the core... they should have been
detected and added only to the modules/ssl and modules/ldap
makefiles'
--On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 4:32 PM -0500 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Installing this filter for the duration of a connection. It is
still a protocol filter, but it lasts for the duration of the
connection. In order to handle pipelined connections, an
Hmm. I'm wondering if
--On Thursday, February 6, 2003 9:07 AM -0500 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ap_http_filter logic in the header parser filter, create a new API
to push bytes back to the core_input_filter when the header parser
filter reads too many bytes and variations.
Eww.
Regardless, I'll wait to
--On Monday, February 10, 2003 3:39 PM -0800 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I want is AuthDigest to decode the username, and password, and
then to pass this onto my mod_python authenticationn scripts,
without having to re-write the entire mod_auth_digest in Python.
The easiest thing
--On Monday, February 10, 2003 4:42 PM -0800 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so now the big question, how long do you think it will be
before Apache2.1 is released? 2 Months? 6 Months? 1+ Year(s)?
I am willing to code it out for Apache2.1 assuming it will be
coming fairly soon, but
--On Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:05 PM -0600 Min Xu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
case. On the other hand, I have used solaris psrset to logically
divide the 14p server into two machines, and I bind the server
and the client to different processor sets. And the results shows
again the small delay
--On Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:52 AM -0600 Min Xu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, I don't think the disk should be bottleneck in any case,
this is because the system has 2GB memory, Solaris's file cache is
able to cache all the file content. top shows the following stats:
The size of
--On Friday, February 14, 2003 4:26 PM -0700 David Shane Holden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem isn't managing a pool of connections... it's if process
A creates the connection, process B can use it with no problem, but
if process C tries to use it, it barfs and spikes in a function in
--On Monday, February 17, 2003 1:45 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first time ap_xml_parse_input() calls ap_get_brigade() it gets
just an EOS bucket, which triggers the failure. But looking at
r-headers_in, I see there is Content-Length: 0 in the request,
so we don't have
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:06 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that was overkill. However, why put anything on the
contributors web page? I believe that information exists right
there, in the KEYS file, as to who signed a given release, with our
email
[ Moved from another list... ]
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:24 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused about the branches naming. Is the following correct:
You're not the only one. I suggested a long time ago renaming the
trees (when we did this whole mess), but
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:07 AM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2003/02/18 19:01:21
Modified:.CHANGES
support apxs.in
Log:
insert LoadModule directives only outside of sections.
PR: 9012
Hmm, I'm
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:05 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the lack of such support for the other variables is a glaring
inconsistency, but I'm scared to mess with 1.3 too much
Looks fine to me. +1. -- justin
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for including 0.0.6 from http://open.cyanworlds.com/ into the
tree ?
I prefer to see a definitive statement regarding the licensing first
(which I don't believe we have yet received).
We also
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:31 AM -0800 Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The default lib mysqlclient is *only* not thread safe in the
mysql_connect (hence the mutex locking around those areas), but
everything else is thread safe. The specialy compiled thread safe
library is
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:33 PM -0500 Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The attached patch changes sig_coredump to call a hook. In the
fullness of time, the ap_exception_info_t provided to the hook
would contain any and all relevant
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm considering releasing 1.3.28 soonish... comments?
I'd like to get André's apxs patch which does the
LoadModule/AddModule fixes in for 1.3.28. It probably just needs to
be reviewed (already applied to httpd-2.0 HEAD), but I think it's
worthy conceptually. =) --
--On Monday, February 17, 2003 14:18:21 +0100 Federico Mennite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new boolean configuration directive named 'ReverseLookups' is added. It
defaults to 'On'. This means that as default it behaves as usual. The
proposed solution lacks maybe a bit of flexibility but it seems
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:35 PM -0800 Aaron Bannert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'd rather see fewer core modules rather than more.
-0 for inclusion.
Personally, I'd support creating an httpd-auth subproject or
something like that which could house a bunch of (more, less?)
--On Friday, February 21, 2003 10:45 PM + Philip M. Gollucci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats a cvs checkout of httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util HEAD tags as of
sometime earlier today.
You probably have a series of directory symlinks in your tree. Try
HEAD again. I committed fixes to apr/apr-util
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:44 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2003/02/22 09:44:30
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES
support Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH suexec.c
Log:
Be more pedantic when cleaning environment. Clean it
immediately after
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 6:46 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks you folks and sorry again for the non-sufficient
log entries.
Ah, geez. It's *not* that big of a deal. =) -- justin
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:05 PM + Philip M. Gollucci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eventually I get this in the prefork directory
tmp=export_files_unsorted.txt; rm -f $tmp touch $tmp; for dir
in /usr/home/philip/Developement/src/httpd2-HEAD-dev/include
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:41 PM + Philip M. Gollucci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should just be saying ~philip/Development/src/apr/include.
Well thats the problem, now question is what did I do wrong ?
Can you please post your config.nice from src/apr?
Thanks! -- justin
--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 9:17 PM + Philip M. Gollucci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is
# ! /bin/sh
#
# Created by configure
/usr/home/philip/Developement/src/httpd2-HEAD-dev/srclib/apr/confi
gure \
Do you mean to be doing a VPATH build? That is, this layout suggests
that you
--On Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:47 PM -0500 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to responds to this (even though I am up to my ears in other
work)... If bb contains -any- bytes after after the call to
ap_get_brigade(), then there is something wrong (that is fixable)
in the filter
--On Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:09 PM -0500 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I know what I was thinking. Check out tmp_bb in ap_read_request
in protocol.c (unpatched version). We create tmp_bb, do
read_request_line, ap_get_mime_headers then destroy tmp_bb. My
patch does essentially
--On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:00 PM -0800 Trevor Hurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-prefer-non-pic -static -c mod_auth_ldap.c touch
mod_auth_ldap.lo
mod_auth_ldap.c:82:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to
have LDAP support built in
Sounds like you need to specify --with-ldap.
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:02 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if absolutely anything added to the dev branch must have a vote
for before merging back to the stable branch, I stand corrected and
will make sure that this won't happen again in the future. I
thought that
--On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:55 PM -0800 Greg Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And remember: this *is* source control. If somebody commits a bug
fix and people want to shoot it down, then we can revert it. But
assuming correctness and committing the fix is hella better than
gating every
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:53 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ The problem here is that R-T-C expresses a fundamental
+ DISTRUST of your peers. We had problems stabilizing the
+ code simply because there are numerous interests in the
+
--On Sunday, March 2, 2003 1:45 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2003/03/02 05:45:00
Modified:modules/generators Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH mod_autoindex.c
Log:
WS and style issues. No code changes.
For future reference, we should not backport style changes to the stable
--On Monday, March 3, 2003 2:14 PM -0500 Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Obviously not. If it is -really- unwise, then we should just not do it. I
see no evidence that is the case though. How, exactly, could this hook be
remotely and uniquely exploited?
We need to keep our signal handling
--On Wednesday, March 5, 2003 8:48 PM -0800 Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm +1 on this as well.
so.. whats the procedure to get this committed into the
experimental/auth area?
As I said before, I don't believe these auth modules should be in the core -
the people who are so interested
--On Tuesday, March 4, 2003 6:43 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Questions for apache gurus/code-reviewers;
- AC_CHECK_HEADERS() appears difficult to coax into accepting additional
include paths, so if --with-ssl=path is specified there appears no
obvious way to have
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 11:41 PM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a PR (16631) that mentions that at least one error log entry is not
assigned to the appropriate error log (in 1.3). The warning is written by
ap_getword_conf, which doesn't know anything about server_rec
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
linking apache. I'm wondering if the above problem is a consequence of
us explicitly setting linker syntax and not letting autotools do their
job properly? Anyway, the patch is there if someone wants to see if it
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 4:14 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
server/mpm/config.m4 has this check with a hard-coded path to APR:
APR_CHECK_APR_DEFINE(APR_HAS_THREADS, srclib/apr)
This fails if APR is anywhere else and config doesn't think APR has thread
support.
Is this
--On Sunday, March 9, 2003 6:48 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If we want to keep our contract with the user about the stable series
valid, this change should go into 2.1 only. Otherwise, users doing a
configure; make; make install or even a config.status could get a
nasty
--On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:30 PM -0500 MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN
(HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay.. I've added some little checks to get SSL-C to be recognized. Here's a
patch (relative to Geoff's patch) that does some checking.. I've added the
complete patch as attachment
--On Friday, March 14, 2003 12:50 AM -0800 Jim Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Howdy,
I have a question in the same vein as my last post. Can I rely on
ap_get_brigade(mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, len=X) to return a brigade of length
no greater than X? It would appear not, which means I need to
--On Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:27 PM -0700 Chia-Hsin Huang
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You must use autoconf and automake to build the project. You can refer to
the address.
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/
Um, none of the dependencies for httpd use
--On Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:44 PM + Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
can we really not rely on /bin/sh doing something vaguely posix-ish?
Nah, we can.
apr-config should work on any real /bin/sh - it's already used right now in
httpd's configure script to query APR's flags, so if there
--On Friday, March 28, 2003 10:30 AM -0800 Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In doing a bit of performance tweaking on 1.3, I noticed that
ap_send_header_field() does an ap_rvputs() with each little piece of a
header which results in separate ap_bwrite() calls for Primitive, :,
Value, crlf
--On Sunday, March 30, 2003 7:02 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Backport of the RPM build scripts to v2.0
Obtained from: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This generates failures on Solaris (which does not have cpp). It also looks
like your grep usage is relying upon some extended grep
--On Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:27 PM +0200 Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will take the code out of buildconf until it can be fixed. I was not aware
of these portability issues, having used the same techniques used in the
spec file (which in hindsight is obviously redhat specific).
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 12:53 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One, win32 won't compile (nor any platform missing chown). In this
case we didn't need it and have a good macro to look at.
Yup. Bad. It'd never get executed on them, but how is the compiler to know?
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 10:09 AM +0200 Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following code will pull the version number out of ap_release.h:
cat include/ap_release.h | grep define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION | cut -d' '
-f3 | tr -d '\'
Is it portable?
FWIW, I'd use:
grep ^#define
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 1:56 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the
next 24 hours. Once the dev@ list receives enough positive feedback,
we will release the files to general availability, moving them to
801 - 900 of 1873 matches
Mail list logo
