Windows 64 bit is fine?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 3:52 PM, SteffenAL wrote:
> No go. All other modules fine, only mod_http2 error.
>
> Recap:
>
> On windows 32:
>
> Generating Code...
> h2_ws.h
> C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\http2\h2.h(173,17): error C2143: syntax
> error: missing ';' b
On 10/16/23 3:18 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 15:12 schrieb SteffenAL :
>>
>> checkout.
>>
>> Looks like h2_ws.h :
>>
>> Generating Code...
>> h2_ws.h
>> C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\http2\h2.h(173,17): error C2143: syntax
>> error: missing ';' before '*'
>> C:\V
I am sorry, but #include "apr_encode.h" is still unconditional in h2_ws.c in
2.4.x. Fixed in r1913027.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 3:31 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after some hickups with getting the new WebSockets support to
> compile on Joe's old computers, we try again!
On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 14:28 schrieb jor...@apache.org:
>>
>> Author: jorton
>> Date: Mon Oct 16 12:28:13 2023
>> New Revision: 1913019
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913019&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Further h2 compile fixes:
>>
>> *
On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> BTW is modules/http2 really CTR for 2.4.x? STATUS says only
> mod_proxy_http2 is.
>
> Anyway: I am +1 for r1913005 and r1913019 for 2.4.x, latter was
> sufficient to get 2.4 building on RHEL8 again (if only we had a CI to do
> this, oh...).
I am also
I will do.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 1:13 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> I added that patch to trunk and merged it into 2.4.x.
>
> I'll make another release candidate soonish. Someone wants to merge the back
> ports idling in STATUS?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 12:55 sc
First of all thanks for RM.
It looks to me that we have 2 accepted backports in the STATUS that have not
been merged.
This seems unfortunate.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 12:07 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> ht
On 9/21/23 3:15 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Thu Sep 21 13:15:35 2023
> New Revision: 1912459
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1912459&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy: Handle backend address renewal with address_ttl= parameter.
>
> Define a new proxy_address struc
On 9/8/23 9:43 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Fri Sep 8 07:43:17 2023
> New Revision: 1912181
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1912181&view=rev
> Log:
> back port proposal
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2
On 8/25/23 9:52 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Fri Aug 25 07:52:31 2023
> New Revision: 1911908
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911908&view=rev
> Log:
> Update and reset.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches
On 8/17/23 1:42 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> How are people feeling about another release?
>
> Since I have tons of bugfixes in 2.4.x and some pending features to port
> back, I offer to RM this.
>
> We have 5 items in 2.4.x/STATUS which lack votes. Would be nice if people
> could fi
On 8/22/23 1:48 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> I believe we can add that to the backport proposal without resetting the
> votes.
Add what to which backport proposal?
Regards
Rüdiger
Currently 2.4.x fails to compile for me with the following error:
In file included from h2_c1_io.c:24:
h2_c1_io.c: In function ‘pass_output’:
/usr/src/apache/httpd-2.4.x/include/http_log.h:495:14: warning: ‘rv’ may be
used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
ap_lo
On 7/17/23 5:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Mon Jul 17 15:52:33 2023
> New Revision: 1911068
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911068&view=rev
> Log:
> Add patch proposal.
>
> Added:
> httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/alias-preserve-path.diff
>
> Added: httpd
On 8/16/23 1:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> So a few questions:
>>>
>>> - Is it reasonable as a standalone additional HTTPProtocolOption to
>>> decide the behavior?
>>> - Thoughts on behavior change in 2.4.x?
>>> - 400 as a status code?
>>>
>>> https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9112.html#rfc.section.6
On 8/2/23 1:29 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi, at $bigco I am seeing more and more scanners reporting HTTP
> request smuggling but the byte stream is really just two pipelined
> requests. They are costly to debunk.
I guess I just miss the point, but how is the above related to the lower?
>
> S
On 7/5/23 2:31 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 4:08 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 2:35 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/29/23 5:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:57 PM wrote:
&g
On 7/10/23 10:11 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 03:52:46PM -, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: ylavic
>> Date: Fri Jul 7 15:52:45 2023
>> New Revision: 1910861
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910861&view=rev
>> Log:
>> ab: Fix accounting of started connection
On 7/7/23 1:00 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Jul 7 11:00:34 2023
> New Revision: 1910846
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910846&view=rev
> Log:
> util_filter: More useful logging for brigade setaside/reinstate/adopt.
>
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/tr
On 7/3/23 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 30.06.2023 um 17:22 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2023 um 16:45 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/30/23 4:15 PM, Stefan
On 6/30/23 4:15 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 30.06.2023 um 15:56 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 2:44 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/30/23 11:08 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: icing
On 6/30/23 11:08 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Fri Jun 30 09:08:23 2023
> New Revision: 1910704
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910704&view=rev
> Log:
> proxy: in proxy tunnels, use the smaller timeout value of
>client and origin as timeout for polling t
On 6/29/23 5:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:57 PM wrote:
>>
>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Tue Apr 25 11:57:22 2023
>> @@ -2790,7 +2790,11 @@ ap_proxy_determine_connection(apr_pool_t
>>
On 6/28/23 3:55 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:08 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/23 2:37 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: covener
>>> Date: Wed Jun 28 12:37:50 2023
>>> New Revision: 1910662
>
On 6/28/23 2:37 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Jun 28 12:37:50 2023
> New Revision: 1910662
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910662&view=rev
> Log:
> back to original patch in PR66672
>
> Since QSNONE will skip splitoutqueryargs, it's where we should fixu
On 6/28/23 12:38 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Jun 28 10:38:27 2023
> New Revision: 1910650
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910650&view=rev
> Log:
> act more like pre-r1908097 with rewrite
>
> - be more conservative with setting QSNONE
> - allow the que
On 6/9/23 6:28 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 6/9/23 14:58, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: rpluem
>> Date: Fri Jun 9 12:58:55 2023
>> New Revision: 1910327
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910327&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * Vote and comment [skip ci]
>>
>> Modified:
>> http
Any feedback on my comments below?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 5/5/23 7:37 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/23 7:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:52:18 2023
>> New Revision: 1909411
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache
On 5/5/23 12:28 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/23 7:35 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:35:08 2023
>> New Revision: 1909409
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909409&view=rev
>> Log:
On 6/7/23 1:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Giovanni;
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:02 AM wrote:
>>
>> Author: gbechis
>> Date: Tue Jun 6 22:02:37 2023
>> New Revision: 1910267
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910267&view=rev
>> Log:
>> mod_ext_filter: check exit status of filter p
On 6/1/23 3:30 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_request.c
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_request.c?rev=1910161&r1=1910160&r2=1910161&view=diff
>>> =
On 6/1/23 2:21 PM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Thu Jun 1 12:21:03 2023
> New Revision: 1910161
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910161&view=rev
> Log:
> *) core: add `final_resp_passed` flag to request_rec to allow
> ap_die() to judge if it can send out a r
On 5/18/23 1:55 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:40 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/18/23 3:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> bump? Just was reminded by a thread on reddit (config unclear but
>>> probably not non-cfgi
the fix, can we let spaces
> through mod_rewrite?
Any reason why we should not encode the spaces as proposed below?
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:18 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&
On 5/18/23 6:45 AM, Benjamin Godfrey wrote:
> Hi, I'm working on the problem of Apache2 ignoring requests to any command in
> the chroot environment. I have seen complaints
> about this posted on a couple of websites, and I have not seen any solution.
> I seem to have narrowed the problem d
On 5/11/23 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> This is a formal vote on whether we sh
On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
>> from Subversion to Git.
>> This means that our latest read/write repository will be
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 5/9/23 8:01 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:51 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/9/23 4:33 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at
On 5/9/23 4:33 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 12:55 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/9/23 12:16 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>>> Still getting feedback in the PR about break
On 5/9/23 12:16 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Still getting feedback in the PR about breakage. Any thoughts on options
> here, like allowing spaces or encoding rather than failing?
Allowing spaces is out of question for me as it creates an invalid request and
opens the door to response splitting.
On 5/8/23 9:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I might suggest another day or two because of the weekend and because it is
> so high-impact. Maybe an extra post to private@ in
> case some PMC members aren't tracking dev@ very closely.
>
>
I intend to close this vote in about 48 hours. It has been op
On 5/9/23 12:00 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> VHS vs BetaMax anyone? :)
Video 2000 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_2000) rules :-)
Regards
Rüdiger
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 4/25/23 7:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:52:18 2023
> New Revision: 1909411
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909411&view=rev
> Log:
> *) mod_autht_jwt: New module to handle RFC 7519 JWT tokens within
> bearer tokens, both as part of
On 4/25/23 7:35 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:35:08 2023
> New Revision: 1909409
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909409&view=rev
> Log:
> core: Add the token_checker hook, that allows authentication to take
> place using mechanisms other than u
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 5/5/23 2:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Down-thread, Giovanni asks about security patch handling. We can continue to
> use repos/private/pmc/httpd/ for that. That area will
> not go away. If people want to go "all git", then Infra can provide projects
> with a single, private repository that w
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via svn.apache.org. It
will be available via Git at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
and https://github
On 4/12/23 2:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>
> @ylavic appro
I am not a Windows guy, but I guess the best way to build trunk on Windows is
to use cmake which is integrated in later versions
of Visual studio.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 4/24/23 1:05 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build httpd on windoze...
>
> "The .dsp project files are
On 4/17/23 1:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:08 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 4/16/23 12:20 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
>>> On 14 Apr 2023, at 17:18, Ruediger Pluem >> <mailto:rpl...@apache.org>> wrote:
On 4/16/23 12:20 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2023, at 17:18, Ruediger Pluem <mailto:rpl...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>> Would that break configs like
>>
>>
>>
>> Alias /filesystemprefix/%{HTTP:X-example-header}
>>
>&
On 4/14/23 4:07 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Fri Apr 14 14:07:49 2023
> New Revision: 1909137
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909137&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_alias: When an alias is declared inside a Location, make sure
> the balance of the URL is preserved to
On 4/12/23 12:35 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> @ylavic approved this pull request.
>>>
>>> Three approvals to get ci started?
>>
>> Nope.. It seems that gh actions don't run for PRs what
On 4/11/23 11:36 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Tue Apr 11 21:36:55 2023
> New Revision: 1909073
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909073&view=rev
> Log:
> PR66563: escaping of url releated server vars
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_
On 4/10/23 11:37 PM, BUSH Steve wrote:
> I just downloaded the apache 2.4.57 source code and attempting to compile on
> Windows, mod_rewrite.c fails with this error:
>
>
> I fixed it for my local build by editing modules/mapper/mod_rewrite.mak and
> updating the CPP_PROJ= lines to include t
On 4/4/23 11:43 PM, gbec...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gbechis
> Date: Tue Apr 4 21:43:46 2023
> New Revision: 1908972
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908972&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix a possible NULL pointer dereference of ap_runtime_dir_relative()
>
> ap_runtime_dir_relative() will r
Rüdiger
>
> On Monday 03/04/2023 at 11:26, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> How do you build it? Via cmake or via the mak files?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rüdiger
>>
>> On 4/3/23 10:51 AM, SteffenAL wrote:
>>> Build no go:
>>>
>>>
>>>
How do you build it? Via cmake or via the mak files?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 4/3/23 10:51 AM, SteffenAL wrote:
> Build no go:
>
>
> ErrorC1083Cannot open include file: 'test_char.h': No such file or
> directorymod_rewriteC:\VS17\Win64\httpd-2.4\modules\mappers\mod_rewrite.c109
>
> Is it ok that I
On 4/2/23 6:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as 2.4.57:
> [X] +1
On 4/3/23 8:45 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/23 8:37 AM, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
>> On 3/30/23 19:28, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/30/23 7:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/30/23 7:0
On 3/31/23 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:15 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 3/31/23 9:56 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/31/23 2:11 AM, yla...@apache
On 3/31/23 9:56 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:28 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 3/31/23 2:11 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: ylavic
>>> Date: Fri Mar 31 00:11:02 2023
>>> New Revision: 1908827
>>>
>>
On 3/31/23 10:04 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:47:05AM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:22 AM wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: jorton
>>> Date: Fri Mar 31 07:21:37 2023
>>> New Revision: 1908835
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908835&view=rev
>>> L
On 3/30/23 11:29 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Primarily to pick up PR66547 and the rewrite improvements, but I also
> seen an h2 crash addressed.
>
Great. Can you please have a look at the two proposals from Yann and me in
STATUS that just lack one vote?
I would like to see them in this release
On 3/31/23 2:11 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Mar 31 00:11:02 2023
> New Revision: 1908827
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908827&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy: Check for space/ctrls in nocanon path/urls before forwarding.
Can this really happen? Wouldn't t
On 3/30/23 7:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/23 7:09 PM, gbec...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gbechis
>> Date: Thu Mar 30 17:09:09 2023
>> New Revision: 1908805
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908805&view=rev
>> Log:
>
On 3/30/23 7:09 PM, gbec...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gbechis
> Date: Thu Mar 30 17:09:09 2023
> New Revision: 1908805
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908805&view=rev
> Log:
> check for more possible SSL failures
> bz #66225
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_en
On 3/14/23 12:11 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Mar 14 11:11:24 2023
> New Revision: 1908380
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908380&view=rev
> Log:
> core: Add formats %{z} and %{strftime-format} to ErrorLogFormat. PR 62161.
>
> %{z} prints the timezone o
On 3/14/23 4:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:30 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 3/14/23 12:11 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: ylavic
>>> Date: Tue Mar 14 11:11:24 2023
>>> New Revision: 1908380
>>>
>>
On 3/14/23 3:37 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Mar 14 14:37:00 2023
> New Revision: 1908388
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908388&view=rev
> Log:
> core: Use the main ErrorLogFormat for ap_log_perror() and while loading
> vhosts.
>
> * server/core.c(crea
On 3/14/23 12:11 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Mar 14 11:11:24 2023
> New Revision: 1908380
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908380&view=rev
> Log:
> core: Add formats %{z} and %{strftime-format} to ErrorLogFormat. PR 62161.
>
> %{z} prints the timezone o
On 3/14/23 10:32 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:14 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 3/14/23 10:06 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 9:21 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/13/23 10:17
On 3/14/23 10:06 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 9:21 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/23 10:17 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: ylavic
>>> Date: Mon Mar 13 21:17:08 2023
>>> New Revision: 1908358
>>>
&
On 3/13/23 10:17 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Mon Mar 13 21:17:08 2023
> New Revision: 1908358
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908358&view=rev
> Log:
> BNEG replaced by BNE= in mod_rewrite.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/conf/extra.conf.in
>
On 3/13/23 4:04 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:59 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/23 3:23 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> Yann, can you check out the failure I committed and see if it's me or
>>> unintended? Ever
On 3/13/23 3:23 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Yann, can you check out the failure I committed and see if it's me or
> unintended? Everything else went pretty smooth and looks useful in a
> bind.
>
> # Check /modules/rewrite/escaping/local_bctls_nospace/foo/bar/%20baz/%0d
> for foo/bar/ baz%0d
> #
On 3/13/23 2:57 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 2:32 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:31 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe we could make [B=] and [BTCLS] not mutually exclusive (encode
>>> both controls and whatever in B=).
>>> I was thinking of a [BNEG
On 3/11/23 10:31 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Sat Mar 11 21:31:14 2023
> New Revision: 1908300
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908300&view=rev
> Log:
> test [P] flag
>
> Modified:
> httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/conf/extra.conf.in
> httpd/test/frame
On 3/8/23 10:44 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I currently get three consistent pytest failures:
Do A) and B) work if you do the requests via HTTP/1.1?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 3/2/23 3:30 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Thu Mar 2 14:30:20 2023
> New Revision: 1907972
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907972&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy: Don't decode r->uri and reencode in r->filename for
> mapping=encoded.
>
> Decoding was not done
On 3/7/23 11:04 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:15:59AM +0100, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 06.03.2023 um 17:53 schrieb Joe Orton :
>>>
>>> [resent to dev@]
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 01:40:39PM -, ic...@apache.org wrote:
Author: icing
Date: Sat
On 3/7/23 9:15 AM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 06.03.2023 um 17:53 schrieb Joe Orton :
>>
>> [resent to dev@]
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 01:40:39PM -, ic...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: icing
>>> Date: Sat Mar 4 13:40:38 2023
>>> New Revision: 1908060
>>>
>>> URL: http://s
On 3/5/23 10:31 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
> [X] +
On 3/6/23 6:46 PM, di...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dirkx
> Date: Mon Mar 6 17:46:04 2023
> New Revision: 1908132
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908132&view=rev
> Log:
> Add SSL_SHARED_CIPHER environment variable
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
> httpd/httpd/tru
On 3/6/23 12:35 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> I was cleaning up some of our private code - and came across the patch below
> - exposing the SHARED_CHIPHERs.
>
> We scratch this itch in a few places to help force (or prevent) the forcing
> of a protocol upgrade from application land.
>
>
On 3/6/23 10:24 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Mon Mar 6 09:24:44 2023
> New Revision: 1908116
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908116&view=rev
> Log:
> * modules/http2/mod_proxy_http2.c: Fix missing APLOGNO.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-mess
On 3/2/23 4:46 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: manu
> Date: Thu Mar 2 15:46:12 2023
> New Revision: 1907984
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907984&view=rev
> Log:
> Add RFC4331 quotas for mod_dav_fs
>
> Address forgotten svn add in previous commit
>
> Added:
> httpd/httpd
On 3/2/23 7:21 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/03/2023 à 16:10, yla...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: ylavic
>> Date: Thu Mar 2 15:10:30 2023
>> New Revision: 1907980
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907980&view=rev
>> Log:
>> mod_proxy_uwsgi: Stricter backend HTTP response p
On 2/15/23 2:48 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> Per my previous Travis is dead, long live GitHub actions.
>
> I propose to broaden the RTC exception in 2.4.x/STATUS to allow CI
> config changes and scripts to be merged from trunk:
>
> Index: STATUS
> ===
On 2/15/23 11:43 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> Support for Travis has now been dropped, so we are relying only on
> GitHub Actions for CI from today.
>
> There are some gaps in the GHA configuration compared to what we had
> running in Travis: notably, we're currently only testing on the latest
> U
On 2/13/23 5:48 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: manu
> Date: Mon Feb 13 16:48:35 2023
> New Revision: 1907608
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907608&view=rev
> Log:
> Add MS-WDV support
>
> MS-WDV specification:
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms
On 2/13/23 5:48 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: manu
> Date: Mon Feb 13 16:48:35 2023
> New Revision: 1907608
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1907608&view=rev
> Log:
> Add MS-WDV support
>
> MS-WDV specification:
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms
On 2/10/23 4:22 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:15:16PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> Do you suggests adding values to Options, or to create a DAVoptions
>>> directive?
>>
>> I think DAVMSextis fine, but with an Options lik
On 2/10/23 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:53:47AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
>> I like the third case with an all/on option. If it will need to be
>> per-directory, maybe an Options like syntax would make sense?
>
> Do you suggests adding values to Options, or to
On 2/10/23 3:53 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:17 AM Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am ready to commit MS-WDV support for mod_dav. There are many other
>> MS extensions, and I just wonder if we should prepare to configure MS
>> extensions one by one or as a wh
On 1/18/23 10:05 AM, Andreas S. Kerber wrote:
> Am Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 03:15:43AM -0500 schrieb Helmut K. C. Tessarek:
>>> 2. As you see the 500 errors only in the access log are they only for
>>> HTTP/2.0 or also for other protocol versions?
>
> I can confirm this too. I have a bunch of h2 s
On 1/18/23 7:01 AM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> Additional info:
>
> I reverted back to 2.4.54 and the errors are gone. It also seems that the
> responses are snappier. The perf observation is
> subjective of course.
>
> Without any proof I suspect that there is some sort of contention/loc
101 - 200 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo
