> From: "Vaughn, Louis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:16 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: I18N Server Side support for OS running foreign locale
>
> Greetings,
>
> First please note that I spent a good bit of time searching the FAQ's & User
> archives before se
From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 5:29 PM
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Shaun Smoot wrote:
>
> > Can some on please help me with a time issue i am having. This may seem a
> > bit of a config question however I can not find any info to help. So I
> > turn to t
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Peter Bieringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: Bug in Makefile regarding installing manuals
> Hi,
>
> manual pages
Peter,
Afraid I don't have an answer, haven't yet ported or tested the IPv6
Win32 code to experiment with.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bieringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturda
Sorry Peter,
Again, wrong guy, I'm forwarding for you to the httpd list.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bieringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject:
Some odds and ends that should be investigated, the bug reports make the
solutions fairly clear and generally simple (if their analysis is correct.);
mod_userdir/8238: A check for absolute paths is made before any quotes are
removed, so ap_os_is_path_absolute returns an incorrect response
Do
Here's the status of my tree.
I've changed my file_walk and dir_walk to create dummy cache records
upon success, that can be tested later.
If r->filename is null, it bypasses both. If it's not an absolute path,
or an empty string, it bypasses dir_walk, and file_walk tests the name.
Later, it m
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:36 PM
> Well, there is a module called mod_auth_any and basically that's what I'm
> talking about, but I'm offering another approach.
>
> Almost all auth modules currently in the core distribution has a lots in
> common
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:08 PM
> It was just an idea between two boring soap operas :)
I hope you aren't implying that there was an intervening,
intersting soap opera (an oxymoron, no doubt :?)
Seriously, don't dismiss the idea, let's begin dis
From: "Günter Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:47 PM
> May I add one bug to Bill's list:
> - mod_vhost_alias not accepting drive letters on Win32 and I assume
> also no volume names on NetWare.
Or OS2 for that matter :(
>I assume it's here:
> if (*map != '/')
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:12 PM
> Someone has brought up the point that an AuthUserFile database
> containing a line with only ':' on it will allow access if the
> supplied username and password are blank and 'Require valid-user'
> is t
This is in my tree, it is now unneccessary?
Index: src/os/netware/os.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/os/netware/os.h,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 os.h
--- src/os/netware/os.h 2001/08/21 20:22:09 1.19
+++ src
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:40 PM
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:02:45PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >...
> > We don't have owners of code. We are a team of people working on a single
> > project. Giving one person ownership implies that they have mo
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: autoindex instead of index.html
> While testing a potential patch for the mod_include seg faults, I was
> seeing an autoindex at the browser instead of the index.html file
> contained
I'll review, thanks for the detailed traceback!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: autoindex instead of index.html
> Greg Ames wrote:
> >
> > But apparently apr_stat isn't called du
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:41 AM
> stoddard01/09/26 07:41:11
>
> Modified:src/os/win32 os.c
> Log:
> Win32: Set errno to ENAMETOOLONG when os_stat() returns -1.
>
> This will fix problem where Apache on Windows can return a directory index
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:59 AM
> wrowe 01/09/26 07:59:29
>
> Modified:src/modules/standard mod_unique_id.c
> Log:
> Implement gettid() based qualifier for MULTITHREAD platforms.
Be warned that we still use the static variables that need
The actual merge occurs in ap_sub_req_method_uri(). Can you breakpoint and
determine what's passed? This sounds like a vhost's per-dir-config may not
be initialized.
I also (reviewing that code) didn't like what I saw...
udir = ap_make_dirstr_parent(rnew->pool, r->uri);
udir =
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:44 PM
> Greg Ames wrote:
> >
> > Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 25 September 2001 03:32 pm, Greg Ames wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, that should fail. Why isn't that an absolute path?
> >
> > That's the bug. We'r
Greg, this isn't an error, and the early "Success" was a catastrophic
failure for many cases.
If a user of 1.3/earlier 2.0 copied index.html to index.html.bak, and
added a new paragraph to index.html, then queried index.html ...
index.html.bak was returned, since the file was _smaller_.
Any ext
I will look at this in the morning, certainly makes sense without
digging in just yet. I will definately apply Cliff's suggestion,
if nothing else :)
Thanks for tracking this down, Justin!
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
It isn't a problem, 1.3 mime/negotation is subtely broken, so of course
this works in 1.3.
OK ... let's start from page one.
Two files in a directory:
index.html.en1590 bytes
index.html.fr1632 bytes
if the user's Accept-Language header is simply en, and they request
index.html, they wi
Should c->remaining become an apr_off_t?
rv = ap_get_brigade(f->next, b, mode, readbytes);
if (rv != APR_SUCCESS)
return rv;
if (ctx->state != BODY_NONE)
>> ctx->remaining -= *readbytes;
>> C:\clean\httpd-2.0\modules\http\http_protocol.c(581) : warning C4244: '-=' :
My bad, that's an http_ctx that Justin added in the .c source (no wonder
my grep of *.h didn't find anything ;)
I'll patch that new struct to apr_off_t in a bit. c->remaining was
already apr_off_t.
- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:44 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Greg, this isn't an error, and the early "Success" was a catastrophic
> > failure for many cases.
>
> Sir,
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:44 AM
> ... daedalus's config file contains
>
> AddHandler send-as-is asis
>
> That says that if /search.html is requested, and file
> /search.html.asis exists, it is a match and it to be served by
> the handler who und
Will do.
I've been kicking around ways to build _all_ the loadable modules from the make files,
adding these projects would have dropped my incentive to finish that project :)
However, I've had too much on my plate. I'll drop these in and get the modules
building on Win32, right after I finish
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:35 AM
>
> The sub_req for index.html.temp is destroyed because
> sub_req->content_type == NULL, which looks correct to me.
Try index.html.en.temp - which may have been what I was thinking of.
Assure that it becomes th
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:59 AM
> Greg Ames wrote:
> >
> > "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > > We still have no mechanism to 'quantify' the quality of one handler or
> &g
hrough mime type negotiation phase.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: .asis handler isn't driven
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 20
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:03 PM
> From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:59 AM
>
> > Actually, for the / situation, it looks like mod_dir will pick the
From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:37 PM
> I am trying your change at the moment by stepping through it with the
> debugger.; I am worried that it fails for the case where CGI is not only
> language authenticated but also on something else; say cha
Include conf/httpd-ssl.conf
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: SSL configuration file
> Quick related question : should I send the default http
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:44 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Better yet...
> >
> > DirectoryIndex index.html
> >
> > index.html.cgi
> > index.html.ssi
> >
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:03 PM
> This is looking more and more like config funkiness as opposed to a serious
> code defect. Unless I see something to change my mind, I am not inclined to
> attempt to fix this in the 1.3 code base.
Whatever.
When I was fixing mod_usertrack in 2.0, I was referring back to the
1.3 behavior and discovered two bits;
1. we waste a ton of time expanding dates that don't need expanding
2. there is still the 'millenial hack' that should be unneccessary now
Any opinions on committing this patch for 1.3.21's
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:04 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > It's bitten several folks. It's been written up on bugtraq as an outstanding
> > case.
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:02 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
> > then mod_negotia
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:06 PM
> > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > The directory CONTENTS cannot be construed as a config error.
> >
> > If we can agree on some scheme to h
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:20 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:15:36PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > In my opinion, there is way too much text in here. Why don't we start by
> > creating a good set of docs for mod_ssl (currently there are non
If you will consider the language from README-WIN32.TXT;
Apache on Win32 should be considered initial-release quality code.
It has not been subjected to the same stresses on its stability and
security that the Unix releases have enjoyed, so there is a greater
possibility of undiscovered v
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:38 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> > > We don't need to list all of the possible alternatives either.
> > > Just the most sane one. And, some of those values *are* the
> > > default
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:43 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
> > of sure that if we are choosing based off file size, that is wrong
I've yanked the following two items from 1.3's STATUS. Both are now
incorporated in 2.0.
* Proposed API Changes:
- r->content_language is for backwards compatibility... with modules
that may not link any longer without some minor editing. The new
field is r->content_languages. Heck
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:08 PM
> This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.
>
> The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
> renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does th
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace is same for
> > all...
>
> I bet it's related to the input filtering changes.
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:09 AM
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Günter Knauf wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > can you please explain if every module really needs an entry in BaseAddress.ref? I
>tested with many modules without an entry and
it
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:33 AM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:34:30PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 P
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:54 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > [There is a weakness. We need to evaluate the exception
> > list by component, right now we simply strcmp. The
> GET /s.t.html.u -> not found
>
> note that in the "not found" cases there (except for /m.o.r.p.n and
> /dhtml), the patched code does pass the file down as being
> potentially valid -- it's later code which decides that it doesn't
> know how to treat
From: "Günter Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:32 AM
> Hi Greg, Bill,
> thanks for the detailed information.
> Now I'm asking me why I did not ask you earlier because I have ~20 modules
> which then better be recompiled...
> I assume that this also applies to Cygwin
Doh --- sorry :) I'll pull that note.
Could all platforms crosscheck the mod_vhost_alias/mod_unique_id changes that
went in? The changes vhost_alias changes _should_ have no discernable effect
on any straight unix ('/' rooted) platform, and the unique_id changes should
only affect MULTITHREAD
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:15 AM
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:10:11AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Now ... the core input filter can't decide where to break input, it has to allow
> > connect
Is MPE actually a threaded server, or am I simply confused?
Are there any MULTITHREAD unix ports, or is this only Win32 and Netware?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:57 AM
> According to Rodent of Unusual Size:
>
> > Negociation is done using the header field values, NOT the
> > URI.
> [...]
> > If the URI is "index.en", an explicitly English variant must
> > match "index
Nope.
Maintaining a list of base addresses implies some intimate knowledge of the size
of the code segment, which we aren't privy to, and will change over a modules'
lifetime based on the type of compilation and whether it draws in static or
dynamic libraries.
It also presumes perl is installed
From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 PM
>
> This patch completely deprectates the Port directive. The ServerName
> directive is now overloaded, so that admins specify the port and name on
> the same directive. It also makes Listen a required directive
Last chance, going once... going twice - need two +1's before I'm willing
to commit this before 1.3.21 rolls. Sure looks BDSS to me.
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 0
Well Gunther, here's the tally;
mod_access.c (*)
mod_actions.c (*)
mod_alias.c (*)
mod_asis.c (*)
mod_auth.c (*)
mod_auth_anon.c (+)
mod_auth_db.c (- requires Berkley DB, use mod_auth_dbm)
mod_auth_dbm.c (+)
mod_auth_digest.c (+)
mod_autoindex.c (*)
mod_cern_meta.c (+)
mod_cgi.c (*)
mod_digest.c
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:26 AM
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > This patch completely deprectates the Port directive.
> > The ServerName directive is now overloaded, so that
> > admins specify the port and name on the same directive.
> > I
Welcome to the doc-split bogosity.
Did you do a clean checkout with -P? After you do so, remove the
htdocs directory, edit your cvs/entries and remove D/htdocs,
then cvs co -Pd htdocs httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs within your apache1.3
directory.
You may now need to cvs tag -F to overcome a partial
ocs - so they will perpetually clash as Bill noticed.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 October 2001 14:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tagging 1.3.21 now
>
>
> Welcome to the doc-split bogosi
From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:04 AM
> On Thursday 04 October 2001 08:50 am, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> > Also, from your example:
> > > Server
At 01:46 PM 4/16/2002, Pier wrote:
>Done...
Very cool; Thank You!!!
Just one note... the line "Send all security vulnerability reports via
email to ." didn't
appear to include the email address. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Again, thank you :)
Bill
At 03:49 AM 4/16/2002, you wrote:
>jerenkrantz02/04/16 01:49:03
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>buildconfig.guess config.sub
>xml/expat/conftools .cvsignore
>srclib/pcre config.guess config.sub
> Added: xml/expat/conftools config
Here's a simple patch that allows windows users who wish to -avoid-
the Event Log to use a '-E file' argument to start Apache, and begin
logging errors to the named file immediately.
It won't catch parsing errors on the command line [duh - how did they
bork that] or in the config args registered
I was reading this error from the umpteenth news poster about 2.0.35 Win2000
failure...
I have the same problem in installing Apache 2.0.35 on WIndows XP:
[Tue Apr 16 20:39:08 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2628
[Tue Apr 16 20:39:08 2002] [notice] Child 2628: Child process is
runnin
At 04:05 PM 4/17/2002, Greg Stein wrote:
>Why is this change required?
Sorry... pulled in 30 directions at once. Here's the short answer.
This bugfix is required. If you study the entire code path of CGI creation
for Win32... you will discover that -most- exec's are by explicit full path
name
At 03:41 PM 4/17/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>I am not at all sure I like ap_rlog_error() adding an error-notes (to
>r->notes) under the
>covers. For those that are not familer with this, if you call
>ap_rlog_error() for a
>failed request, the first call will copy your log message to the output
At 01:01 PM 4/17/2002, you wrote:
>Any chance of getting this patch implemented in a future 1.3.x release?
As the author of that patch for 2.0 ... I have to suggest no. Many other
interrelated changes have gone into 2.0's negotiation and other entangled
modules. Changing that back in 1.3 is no
At 05:28 PM 4/17/2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 03:21:51PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > Then copy the ,v file, then do a cvs rm of the original file. Finally,
> > > remove the tags from the new file.
> >
> > +1
>
>Better, thou
At 04:26 PM 4/17/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>At 04:05 PM 4/17/2002, Greg Stein wrote:
>>Why is this change required?
>
>So we had to add the apr_progtype_e * so that it could be updated to reflect
>the new choice of interpreter.
Doug and I were just chatting about th
At 04:33 AM 4/18/2002, Sander Striker wrote:
>There have been several bug fixes since 2.0.35,
>the community should benefit from that IMO.
No doubt :)
>What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
I just let a nightly binary build fly on ~wrowe/ that I've posted in response
to certain bugfixes no
At 08:08 PM 4/17/2002, David Young wrote:
>From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Any chance of getting this patch implemented in a future 1.3.x release?
> >
> > As the author of that patch for 2.0 ... I have to suggest no.
>
>How abo
At 07:58 AM 4/18/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>At 08:08 PM 4/17/2002, David Young wrote:
>>
>>How about adding it to contrib then?
>
>+1
>
>Renamed for clarity to force_language_priority.patch. Changed header
>to reflect a cvs diff.
>
>Copied to http
At 07:51 AM 4/17/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>I have my doubts about this but I don't have a better suggestion... If you
>have tested
>this on Win2k/NT, lets give it a shot...
Well... early reports indicate some success. Go figure. I'll continue to
watch for
feedback from testers.
> > I was
Is this bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8242
resolved with the other proxy fixes?
At 07:37 AM 4/19/2002, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've commited a fix to proxy which allows it to handle the
>unexpected-100-continue case that caused it to break when viewing sites
>like Hotmail.
At 01:43 PM 4/19/2002, Jos Backus wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > At 2:37 PM +0200 4/19/02, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > >
> > >Is it possible to create a 1.3.26 release which includes all the proxy
> > >fixes to date?
> > >
> >
> > I'm +1 for a 1.3.26...
>
Configuration: mod_proxy - Win32
Release
Compiling...
proxy_util.c
D:\clean\apache-1.3\src\modules\proxy\proxy_util.c(1571) : error C2065:
'ETIMEDOUT' : undeclared identifier
D:\clean\apache-1.3\src\modules\proxy\proxy_http.c(585) : warning C4700:
local variable 'len' used without having been initialized
Other than that, we build clean once again on Win32 (other than FD_SET
mismatches,
a known issue with no obvious, trivial workaround.)
Bill
Anyone care to try reproducing this bug on non-Win32, to reassure us
that it's a general bug across platforms?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8357
Thanks.
At 08:55 AM 4/24/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >
> > > We have the exact same issue with mod_cache
> > > (mod_mem_cache/mod_disk_cache). What do you think about hiding the load
> > > of the protocol modules behind a config directive?
> >
> > I don't h
At 02:23 PM 4/24/2002, Guilherme Dávalos wrote:
hi
folks,
I installed an apache http server on my machine [...]
Anybody knows what's happening?
Yup. You are emailing a developer's list, where this sort of
question
is out of place [in spite of repeating that config question are not
appropriate
Can we agree to follow convention and change the mod_mem_cache
and mod_disk_cache names to mod_cache_mem and mod_cache_disk?
This follows precedent set by mod_dav (mod_dav_fs) and mod_proxy
(mod_proxy_connect, _ftp and _http.)
Seeing as neither module is documented, and they remain experimental,
Oh worthy RM... would you consider a humble request to roll in the following
disconnected build targets into release .36? We don't build them by default,
at this point, but there have been requests for "how to build?" both of these
modules. As it stands after this patch, they simply need to copy
Since a number of folks have complained about the major bump, I've reconsidered
the impact on those testing 3rd party add-ons, and it would be good to
avoid this
bump due to internal changes for ssl, proxy and cgi.
But the APR changes are a little more troublesome. On win32 we can live with
a m
T-1200
If I don't see any agreement that this is the way to go, I'll be happy to
revert
to the original mmn bump.
Please comment. This should be a group decision.
Bill
At 07:59 AM 4/29/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>Since a number of folks have complained about the maj
Outch - my fault. Fixed
At 09:31 AM 5/1/2002, Jerry wrote:
> copy modules\experimental\Release\mod_ext_filter.so "\Apache2\modules"
><.y
>The system cannot find the file specified.
>NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'copy' : return code '0x1'
>Stop.
>Error executing NMAKE.
>
>Apache.exe - 1 error(s),
At 06:15 PM 5/1/2002, Jerry Baker wrote:
>I assume that pulling the APACHE_2_0_36 tag gets me the same things
>as the aforementioned tarballs? If so, built and ran on Windows XP ok.
>
>PS - There is some trouble with a couple of the awk actions on
>Windows XP at least. The following lines from mak
At 05:24 PM 5/3/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 3 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> > Ok, but where should this information go then? Apache has definitely
> > benefitted by having this information available. Some sort of
> > X-SERVER-INFO: header then?
>
>What I meant was I don't think the MPM shoul
At 06:08 PM 5/3/2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
>Cliff Woolley wrote:
>>On Fri, 3 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>>Possibly. I guess I draw the line by saying that it's okay to announce
>>version numbers, but configuration parameters are out. I don't have so
>>much of a problem with third-party mo
At 10:06 PM 5/3/2002, you wrote:
> > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > At 06:08 PM 5/3/2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > >
> > >On this note what do people think in making the 'default' install only
> show the
> > >major ver
At 01:40 PM 5/6/2002, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there any special voodoo to be performed to create the apache release
>zip files?
The nastiest. Need to build all, then export make files (so that all
dependent files
exist when creating dependencies) ... and pack up .mak, .dep, and .rc (awk
version
Seems httpd-2.0.36/test/* is present in the distribution tarballs.
Is this an oversight in the roll-release scripts, or did our good RM
roll the tarball by hand? I wouldn't pull the tarball over this, it's
simply something worth checking out before .37.
-win32 source and binary packages are up a
Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
At 09:57 AM 5/10/20
At 10:50 AM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
> > /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
> > fails to get from 'here' to
http://www.apacheweek.com/features/apachepda/
was an april fools joke. What isn't a joke is that Apache is based on APR,
the Apache Portability Runtime. That library isolates 90% of the pain of
porting Apache to another platform (currently many Unicies, Netware, OS2
and Windows 9x and NT famili
Ahhh. Win95 and forward do support the /y flag. Since WinNT does not,
I'll revert the change that presumed our modern command.com/cmd.exe
based xcopy'ies all work.
Expect a fix in .37 - thanks for the report!
Bill
At 12:11 PM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>Hello Sir,
>
>I sent this to [EMAIL PROTECTE
At 01:18 PM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>At 01:55 PM 05/10/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>Ahhh. Win95 and forward do support the /y flag. Since WinNT does not,
>>I'll revert the change that presumed our modern command.com/cmd.exe based
>>xcopy'ies all work.
&g
At 05:07 PM 5/10/2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>Symbol renames in APR are going to cause a problem for the web server.
>Apache 2.0.36 is using the same major MMN as 2.0.35, but it isn't
>compatible, because apr_explode_time was removed (as a single example,
>there are more). We need to have some way t
201 - 300 of 6469 matches
Mail list logo
