On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/8/2012 12:04 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
on the other side: I've asked me already often if we shouldnt increase the
maxchar/line; I
believe that would in many cases greatly increase readability ...
and honestly:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:09, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 15:34, Joachim Zobel jzo...@heute-morgen.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:04 -0400, Akins, Brian wrote:
For filters, etc, not sure we really need buckets in Lua. Maybe just
represent them as a table of buffers or something simple like that.
This misses my
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:57, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:08 AM EDT, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com
wrote:
How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production?
Am I the only one on a real site?
I guess the others, if any,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:08, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
functionality
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 08:05, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:36 AM EDT, HyperHacker hyperhac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to
make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web
scripting
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 03:49, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 03 Sep 2010, at 5:31 AM, dave b wrote:
Sure ok :)
You have no complains from me really here. Just this could be an issue
on some platform with some mods potentially :)
In order to understand why it isn't an issue for
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 07:12, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 03 Sep 2010, at 2:37 PM, HyperHacker wrote:
...assuming he attacks a single httpd thread, as opposed to say a
distributed attack or attack on an unrelated process.
How would a distributed attack be different?
Obviously
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:24, dave b db.pub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
first the attacker has to find a way to reduce system memory to an
almost oom condition
Say, by attacking several httpd threads and/or unrelated processes to
get them to eat up memory.
--
Sent from my toaster.
If you know
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:34, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 6/8/10 8:07 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
That's a shame. I wonder if another embedded language would do better?
E.g. mod_perl, mod_python? They've both been around for a while. I
wonder why neither has
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 16:25, Sergey Chernyshev
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds scary! How do large companies enable gzip then? How many hoops
do they jump through? sounds like those hoops are in thousands!
And I don't understand how one company's setup would be different from
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:23, exp...@hope.cz wrote:
Let’s suppose this configuration
|Server1| - |Server2| - |Client|
A client sends a request that starts a script on Server2.The script (
running on server2)
will download a webpage from Server1.
Is it possible to record
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:52, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 20:12, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2010-05-11 at 12:55, HyperHacker hyperhac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
(defaults to handle). I
I haven't used it, but if mod_reqtimeout makes it entirely redundant,
my vote would be to keep it in trunk only. People interested in how
the attack/defence work can look at it, and there might be those who
for some reason don't want mod_reqtimeout.
--
Sent from my toaster.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 14:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 3/21/2010 3:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Include conf/empty/*
Include conf/*/whoops.conf
The last one (based on an existing conf/empty directive) fails, alerting the
admin
to the fact that they made a
A while back I had the idea that Lua would be a great scripting
language for web servers. I checked Google, and several pages
mentioned a recently developed Apache httpd module that does just
that. However, even months later, all a search finds is a couple blogs
and sites talking about the next
18 matches
Mail list logo
