The -deps tarball was hidden (one had to look around for it) so
I just added a note that sometimes we provide it as a convenience.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this
On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
I hope she is doing better now.
I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
Any conflicts??
You might want to take a look at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1241953
Since
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
Any conflicts??
On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm proposing a TR of 2.4.3 for this Friday (the 10th)... I'll
be RMing.
On 8/14/2012 4:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
Sorry to hear, hope she is recovering :(
I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
+1 - I'll address anything wrong for mak/dep files. Jeff's brilliant
catch of that regression in core.c to the
On 8/14/2012 10:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's also been a bit over 6 mos since we released 2.2.22, and there are
obviously some who can't yet upgrade waiting for binary modules. So I'm
proposing to TR 2.2.23 at the same point this Friday. It will close
the one security issue that
I'm proposing a TR of 2.4.3 for this Friday (the 10th)... I'll
be RMing.
