Re: Mass Vhosting SuExec (was Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location)

2003-01-03 Thread Thom May
* Colm MacCárthaigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:43:18PM +, Thom May wrote: * Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : The log is generated from the suexec binary, not httpd, right? Then we can't use a directive to control it and it needs to be hardcoded

Re: Mass Vhosting SuExec (was Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location)

2003-01-02 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:23:07AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: suexec will never work correctly with vhost_alias, or mod_rewrite :) How would you tell it what username/group to use ? The approach used where I developed mod_vhost_alias was to get them from the ownership of the script that

Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2003-01-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
Reid wrote: Maybe we should have another directive for the suexec log? But I agree it shouldn't be hardcoded. david - Original Message - From: Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 11:39 AM Subject: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log

Re: Mass Vhosting SuExec (was Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location)

2003-01-01 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:43:18PM +, Thom May wrote: * Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : The log is generated from the suexec binary, not httpd, right? Then we can't use a directive to control it and it needs to be hardcoded for safety. The other issue for suexec is mass

[PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2002-12-31 Thread Thom May
This is to fix PR 15713 suexec-logfile has hardcoded default instead of being placed in --logfiledir I'm not sure it's right, though, since I'm not sure of the status of suexec on win32/other places where ap_config_layout.h isn't available. -Thom Index: support/suexec.h

Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2002-12-31 Thread David Reid
Maybe we should have another directive for the suexec log? But I agree it shouldn't be hardcoded. david - Original Message - From: Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 11:39 AM Subject: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2002-12-31 Thread Thom May
--with-suexec-logfile; but we shouldn't have suexec break into many pieces just 'cos they don't... -Thom - Original Message - From: Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 11:39 AM Subject: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2002-12-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 05:39 AM 12/31/2002, Thom May wrote: This is to fix PR 15713 suexec-logfile has hardcoded default instead of being placed in --logfiledir I'm not sure it's right, though, since I'm not sure of the status of suexec on win32/other places where ap_config_layout.h isn't available. No problem on

Re: [PATCH] remove hardcoding of suexec log location

2002-12-31 Thread Brad Nicholes
NetWare doesn't use suexec. To switch users on NetWare, they must be using our mod_nds (1.3.x) or mod_edir (2.0) module. Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday,