Re: 2.6/3.0 yet again...

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 This sounds like a good way forward. > Am 09.02.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this >> was just a

2.6/3.0 yet again...

2018-02-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this > was just a strawman? > That is a false statement. If enough people wanted 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, it would have. All I want