If it could help your PR effort, maybe you could have some kind of
online testimonial or survey page of companies or big sites that
have moved to Apache 2.2, stating how much time it took them to
migrate to it from the previous server version, how much effort it took
to migrate their propietary
On 02.10.2007, at 20:52, Paul Querna wrote:
So, the first step is to cut out any illusion that new features are
going into 1.3, with a statement like this:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be
fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
I honestly
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd something
to chew on.
Not to mention that it would be good
On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 08:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, we could do:
o Apache 1.3 and 2.0 deprecated
As part of the support community, I'd like to have this defined
pretty clearly.
I presume it can't mean no more bug fixes or security
On 10/2/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 08:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, we could do:
o Apache 1.3 and 2.0 deprecated
As part of the support community, I'd like to have this defined pretty
clearly.
I presume it can't mean no more bug fixes or security
On 10/2/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd
On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 10/2/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 10/2/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near
On Oct 2, 2007 11:52 AM, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the first step is to cut out any illusion that new features are
going into 1.3, with a statement like this:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
On 10/02/2007 08:52 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 10/2/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm
On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
So, the first step is to cut out any illusion that new features are
going into 1.3, with a statement like this:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be
fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
I honestly
this is something really worth pondering;
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/server_graph.html?type=httpdomaindir=month=200709servbase=YToyOntpOjA7czoxMzoiQXBhY2hlLzIuMC41OSI7aToxO3M6MTM6IkFwYWNoZS8xLjMuMzciO30=serv1=QXBhY2hlLzIuMi40
Give that some thought :)
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd something
to chew on.
Not to mention that it would be good for folks to start exploring
what needs to be fixed in the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
this is something really worth pondering;
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/server_graph.html?type=httpdomaindir=month=200709servbase=YToyOntpOjA7czoxMzoiQXBhY2hlLzIuMC41OSI7aToxO3M6MTM6IkFwYWNoZS8xLjMuMzciO30=serv1=QXBhY2hlLzIuMi40
Give that some thought :)
Paul Querna wrote:
I'm not sure what we are supposed to think about?
Lots of people still use 1.3 for their own reasons, its not going to
hold me back on things I would like to do in 2.4 or 3.0.
Good point; maybe this is part of the issue, what we *already* do today
in 2.2 etc, vs. what
On 10/1/2007 at 4:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], William
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd something
to
16 matches
Mail list logo
