Nick Kew wrote:
Currently, the 'httpready' Accept Filter is always applied on FreeBSD.
This breaks protocols like NNTP where the server must send data first.
OK, I can see that the idea in general makes sense, and that's
an instance of why.
OTOH, how useful is apache really for nontrivial
-protocol branch. I
would love some code review and criticism.
Currently, the 'httpready' Accept Filter is always applied on FreeBSD.
This breaks protocols like NNTP where the server must send data first.
Short: Existing Configurations should behave nearly the same.
Long:
Extended
Paul Querna wrote:
I have completed what I intend to do with the listen-protocol branch. I
would love some code review and criticism.
I'd love some time ...
Currently, the 'httpready' Accept Filter is always applied on FreeBSD.
This breaks protocols like NNTP where the server must send data
I have completed what I intend to do with the listen-protocol branch. I
would love some code review and criticism.
Currently, the 'httpready' Accept Filter is always applied on FreeBSD.
This breaks protocols like NNTP where the server must send data first.
Short: Existing Configurations should
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 06:26 PM 5/5/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
Comments, ideas, alternatives, flames, and code review are
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:26:41PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
2. Add a Protocol command to force the protocol inside a vhost.
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:26:41PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
2. Add a Protocol command to force the protocol
Paul Querna wrote:
I think mixing Listen and Protocol has the potential of
confusing things more than solving problems (ala Listen and
Port used to)... What is the exact problem this is trying to fix?
--
===
Jim
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I think mixing Listen and Protocol has the potential of
confusing things more than solving problems (ala Listen and
Port used to)... What is the exact problem this is trying to fix?
The Problem:
We do not know what protocol will be used to handle a
Paul Querna wrote:
The Problem:
We do not know what protocol will be used to handle a connection until
runtime. We currently cannot determine this at startup.
This results in:
Primary: Accept Filters and TCP_DEFFER_ACCEPT are currently not used
correctly. The 'httpready' accept
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
2. Add a Protocol command to force the protocol inside a vhost. (done)
3. Allow mod_ssl to be active without setting 'SSLEngine on'.
At 06:26 PM 5/5/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
Comments, ideas, alternatives, flames, and code review are welcome.
Only a question thus
12 matches
Mail list logo
