On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:57 +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 12:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 09:56
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:57 +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:57 +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 12:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/21/2007 02:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The logic should be:
1. If a per-worker value is set, use that.
2. If not, then if a ProxyTimeout value is set, use that.
3. Otherwise, use Timeout
+1 on fixing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 12:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Digging somewhat deeper to actually do this I
On 05/21/2007 02:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The logic should be:
1. If a per-worker value is set, use that.
2. If not, then if a ProxyTimeout value is set, use that.
3. Otherwise, use Timeout
+1 on fixing that :)
Digging somewhat deeper to actually do this I found the
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:07 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/21/2007 02:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The logic should be:
1. If a per-worker value is set, use that.
2. If not, then if a ProxyTimeout value is set, use that.
Dear customer,
Thank you for your message. Due to the extraordinarily large number of
e-mails that we are currently receiving, it might take us up to several
days to reply to your request. We thank you for your patience and understanding,
and will get back to you as soon as possible.
With kind
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Juni 2007 13:16
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:07 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote
On May 19, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/19/2007 04:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 5/18/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently ProxyTimeout does not work as documented as the default
value is not
300 secs, but the Timeout setting of the server. The question
On 5/21/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 19, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/19/2007 04:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 5/18/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently ProxyTimeout does not work as documented as the default
value is not
300 secs
Brian Rectanus wrote:
Comments on the idea of this?
I was just going to point out that it's definitely useful being able to
specify separate connection and actual request timeouts. From a quick
look at your diff, you already have this in mind. :)
An example: with a reverse proxy, you
On 05/21/2007 11:29 PM, Stuart Children wrote:
It would be nice to have the connection timeout as a proper directive -
rather than only as a parameter to ProxyPass - so that people enabling
mod_proxy via other mechanisms can set it. Also so that you can set a
This issue is addressed on
On 5/18/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently ProxyTimeout does not work as documented as the default value is not
300 secs, but the Timeout setting of the server. The question to me is now:
What should be fixed?
- Documentation (such that it matches the code)
- Code
On 05/19/2007 04:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 5/18/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently ProxyTimeout does not work as documented as the default
value is not
300 secs, but the Timeout setting of the server. The question to me is
now:
What should be fixed
15 matches
Mail list logo