Re: RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi everyone, a couple of modules have additional external dependencies: mod_deflate: zlib mod_lua: lua mod_serf: serf mod_socache_dc: distcache At the moment, the compiled modules do not contain any RPATH/RUNPATH info

Re: RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

Hi Joe, On 05.07.2011 09:46, Joe Orton wrote: On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi everyone, a couple of modules have additional external dependencies: mod_deflate: zlib mod_lua: lua mod_serf: serf mod_socache_dc: distcache At the moment, the compiled modules

Re: RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD flags. Putting the -R ... into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy, because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given directory. The real problematic cases are only mod_lua and in rare circumstances (you want to

Re: RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD flags. Putting the -R ... into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy, because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given directory. The real

Re: RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

On 7/5/2011 2:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote: IMO it is much better to leave this stuff in the control of people who build the software, who can already set env vars or LDFLAGS as they require. (It would also be much better if everybody used libtool, since as you say, the .la files make this

RUNPATH for module dependencies on Unix/Linux

Hi everyone, a couple of modules have additional external dependencies: mod_deflate: zlib mod_lua: lua mod_serf: serf mod_socache_dc: distcache At the moment, the compiled modules do not contain any RPATH/RUNPATH info except when the libraries themselves are installed as libtool libraries, i.e.