Re: [VOTE] Apache Hudi graduation to top level project

> > appointed > > > to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hudi Project: > > > > > > * Anbu Cheeralan > > > > > > * Balaji Varadarajan > > > > > > * Bhavani Sudha Saktheeswaran >

Re: [DISCUSS] Readiness for graduation to TLP

+1 On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:39 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to start a discussion on our readiness to pursue graduation > to > > TLP and potentially follow up with a VOTE with a formal

Apache project maturity model

Hi, The maturity model is an (optional) framework for evaluating the project. I would recommend to take a look and check if there are focus areas for the path towards graduation: https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html Thanks, Thomas

Re: Reporting 0.5.0-incubating release to reporter.apache.org

Sorry for the late reply. The reporter is applicable to top level projects. But please create a DOAP file for Hudi, where you can also list the release: https://projects.apache.org/create.html Thomas On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:19 PM

Re: EMR + HUDI

Congratulations everyone, this is great news! On Fri, Nov 15, 2019, 7:08 PM vino yang wrote: > Big news! > > Thanks, Udit! Great job and also thanks for all the whole community! > > Best, > Vino > > leesf 于2019年11月16日周六 上午7:55写道： > > > Great news! > > > > Thanks Udit and everyone who make it

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 released!

Great to see this first release completed! Thanks Balaji and everyone who contributed. -- sent from mobile On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 8:56 AM Nishith wrote: > Great job Balaji! Thank you for driving this. > > - Nishith > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 25, 2019, at 4:29 AM, Vinoth Chandar

Re: [DISCUSS] Rename HIP process to RFC

Just in case that wasn't considered: Not every document needs to be on cwiki, it is perfectly fine to write up ideas that are not a formal "HIP" in gdocs or similar. Thomas On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:40 PM Nishith wrote: > +1 > > Encourages folks to read and write designs/ideas. > > Sent from

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #6

+1 (binding) I was surprised about the large diff compared to the previous release though. Looking at https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/commits/release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6 it appears it includes a rebase to master? I think the difference between RCs should be limited to the issues raised

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #5

Nishith Agarwal (Binding) >- Vinoth Chandar (Binding) >- Prasanna Rajaperumal (Binding) >- Udit Mehrotra > > There was one -0 vote from Thomas Weise. He has pointed out the missing > "incubating" keyword in NOTICE file but also noted that this inconsistency > is

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #5

sider move forward with this RC (that's why -0) On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:55 AM Thomas Weise wrote: > -0 (binding) > > NOTICE needs to include "(incubating)" > > Minor: VOTE refers to "The official Apache source release and binary > convenience releases" but

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2019

Looks good, signed off. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:34 AM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > @mentors, I have updated the wiki with draft notes. Kindly review. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: > Date: Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 5:44 PM > Subject: Podling Report Reminder - October 2019 > To: >

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #2

working document that I am making changes to capture release > process. I will be publishing them to a wiki once the first release > candidate is approved. > Balaji.V > > > > > On Monday, September 30, 2019, 08:44:12 AM PDT, Thomas Weise < > t...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #2

The source release contains at least one binary: hudi-0.5.0-incubating-rc2 $ find . -name *.jar ./hudi-cli/lib/dnl/utils/textutils/0.3.3/textutils-0.3.3.jar There could be more, this was just the first check run. Have you already scripted building the release candidate from clean source and the

source connectors

Hey, Seeing the discussions about adding new connectors to Hudi, makes me wonder if it would be possible to bridge existing connectors and their upstream projects with a sink that produces the input expected by Hudi instead. Reason I'm bringing this up is that it takes significant effort and

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #2

Please check your rat configuration. It excludes too many files. I would recommend to make it very specific and have such issues highlighted early in the CI. It is also possible to automate license header generation, besides just checking it. Here is one example:

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #1

e/hudi/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thomas Weise wrote: > Please note that after this release is approved by the PPMC, another vote > will be needed on general@incubator. > > I would recommend to review comments and issues of other incubator > releases votes in the archive a

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.0-incubating, release candidate #1

Please note that after this release is approved by the PPMC, another vote will be needed on general@incubator. I would recommend to review comments and issues of other incubator releases votes in the archive as some tend to repeat for first releases of a podling. On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 7:39 PM

Re: ApacheCon NA 19 slides

Thanks for sharing. The presentation provides a nice intro into Hudi that will help making new folks more curious. It explains the journey and lessons learned along the path, which is equally valuable and no doubt will resonate with the many folks that had to solve similar problems. Unfortunately

Re: [For Mentors] Readiness for IP Clearance

he xml page :) > Thanks,Balaji.VOn Friday, August 30, 2019, 05:29:52 PM PDT, Thomas > Weise wrote: > > The signed CCLA was recorded on 2019/05/09 > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:24 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > > > Good point. Balaji was following up on this? may b

Re: [For Mentors] Readiness for IP Clearance

The signed CCLA was recorded on 2019/05/09 On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:24 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > Good point. Balaji was following up on this? may be all we need is another > LEGAL/INFRA ticket? > I see the name search status is reflected now. > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:13

Re: [For Mentors] Readiness for IP Clearance

ion > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/49a42ca7dbbd8d50c62d9c936b4733a862eff3de54fdd11b2bfbf532@ > > But, I think there is a snag. They had to resubmit it signed. So I dont > have an email showing the final acknowledgement. > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:51 PM Thomas Weise w

Re: [For Mentors] Readiness for IP Clearance

In the future it would be helpful to keep the conversation in a single place. In this case, it diverted to slack and the list would be more appropriate. Do you have the reference for the SGA recording? I don't think that another IP clearance is required, since it was already done as part of

Re: [Mentors - Help Needed] Setting up Nightly builds for Apache Hudi (incubating)

Balaiji, I added you to the Jenkins admin group. Please proceed with caution as this gives access to Jenkins as a whole, not just for the Hudi project. This should be all you need, but let me know if you have run into issues. The snapshots folder should be created automatically once you start

Re: Reg: Few questions on Hudi Status in Whimsy

It seems that the name search should be reflected automatically. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-288 On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:20 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > I updated the project status page. > > I don't know where we need to record the completion of the podling name &g

Re: Reg: Few questions on Hudi Status in Whimsy

I updated the project status page. I don't know where we need to record the completion of the podling name search so that it reflects in Whimsy. I'm going to search or ask. Thomas On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:18 PM Suneel Marthi wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out - one of us mentors needs to

Re: Committership guidelines

Hi Vinoth, Take a look at this as well: https://beam.apache.org/contribute/become-a-committer/ It is not just the criteria, but more so the path to get there. And what we can do to encourage and recognize contributions. Thomas On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:30 AM Suneel Marthi wrote: > Please

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2019

Report looks good, thanks for putting it together. I just add my sign-off. On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:53 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > Thanks! Shall I mark your name in “signed-off by” section myself or I ll > leave it you ? > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:53 PM Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > lgtm -

Re: [DISCUSS] Steps to making the first Apache release

Hi, Renaming packages is a step that I would recommend to occur before the first ASF release. There is a lot more work: * license headers in all files * check dependencies: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html * ensure no binaries are in source releases * etc etc You could also discuss

Fwd: Call for presentations - ApacheCon North America

Consider submitting a speaker proposal before May 13th! -- Forwarded message - From: Zoran Regvart Date: Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 7:52 AM Subject: Call for presentations - ApacheCon North America To: Hi Apache developers, (apologies if you're receiving this e-mail multiple times on

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2019

Thanks Suneel, I signed off. I think going forward we can stage the report on the wiki directly, skipping the extra copy step. Also we will switch to 3 month reporting interval after this report! Thomas On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:04 PM Suneel Marthi wrote: > submitted - other mentors please

GitHub notifications

It appears that as part of the repo transfer settings also changed to route these notifications to dev@ whereas before they would go to commits@ Unless this was intentional I would suggest to file an INFRA ticket to return to previous settings. Subscribers on this list may not expect or

Re: JIRA setup

still creating > > GH issues atm. > > Want to add better docs for signing up on ASF Infra and getting them > moved > > over. > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:53 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > >> You are right, folks need to be added to the roles. &

Re: JIRA setup

s able to. > Thought everyone would have the same issue. > > Nishith, add you just now. > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:41 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > JIRA should already be setup so that PPMC members have the required > > permissions. > > > > Any specific issue

Re: JIRA setup

JIRA should already be setup so that PPMC members have the required permissions. Any specific issue you encounter? On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:39 PM nishith agarwal wrote: > My JIRA ID : *nishith29* > > -Nishith > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:36 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > > > I just started on

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

nishith agarwal wrote: > Thomas, > Do you have any idea why my name doesn't show up on the PPMC list ? > > -Nishith > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:04 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > Great! I made a few minor tweaks and signed off. > > > > Please also take a

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

off > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 3:15 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > > > Ack! > > > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:50 AM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > >> Vinoth at al.: The report is due March 6th. > >> > >> Please edit the draft on: https://wiki.apac

Re: Migrating issues to jira

t; >> > > >> > @thomas, not a must. But there are a lot of valid issues there. We > > will > > >> > anyway move most of them over manually if automation is not > possible. > > >> > > > >> > Per earlier conversation, I think

Re: Site documentation

hub.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/6 > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:11 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > > > Got it. PR coming soon. > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:40 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > >> No attachments on the list :( > >> > >> Som

Re: Design documentation tools

pache.org ? > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:13 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > The confluence wiki space should be created in any case. I believe this > can > > be done by mentors through the infra self serve portal, but don't have it > > in front of me at the moment. > &g

Re: Design documentation tools

t; > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:46 PM Suneel Marthi < > > suneel.mar...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the Flink FLIPs r initially done in a working google doc > > and > > >

Re: Site documentation

add "incubating" .. > > Thanks > Vinoth > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:45 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > Nice! > > > > As one of the next steps, we probably want to add the appropriate footer > > like this: > > > > [image: image.png] > &g

Re: Site documentation

AM Vinoth Chandar > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Infra was fixed an issue and now I have merge access. > > > >> > > > > >> > Others, can you please finish setting up gitbox and verify you see > > > >&g

Re: Site documentation

n't actually merge it yet) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/3 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:22 PM Vinoth Chandar > wrote: > > > > > done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17848 > > > > > > On Wed, Feb

Re: Site documentation

part of the podling. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:22 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > >> Go ahead and file a JIRA, make sure to include sufficient information on > >> issue and expected behavior though. > >> > >> In

Re: Site documentation

omeone please file and infra ticket to fix that. > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:17 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > Check what you see here: > > > > https://github.com/orgs/apache/teams?query=@vinothchandar > > > > I suspect you would need be member of: >

Re: Site documentation

ce I > get > > > it working, will respond with steps and later add it to docs.. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:47 PM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > > > > Vinoth, > > > > > > > > When your github account is properly link

Re: Site documentation

> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:54 AM Thomas Weise wrote: > > > Yes, there is some delay, that is synced periodically. So give it a bit > of > > time and then check again. > > > > BTW any plans to generate the content also :) > > > > On Tue, Feb 12,

Re: Site documentation

> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:01 PM Vinoth Chandar < > > > > > > mail.vinoth.chan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bumpingn this thread again. >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - February 2019

That question is on the podling report: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019 On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 10:17 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > Hello, > > Our mentors have been very helpful. No open issues. > > Please let me know if there is a wiki, I can help update. > > Thanks > Vinoth > >

Re: Site documentation

A pull request is the common way to propose changes in other projects, so that's good. One of the things you will want to work on going forward are contributor guidelines that explain this, among other things. Other suggestions (that can all be taken up as follow-up, perhaps worth creating a

Re: Interactive support channel

My personal opinion is that Slack can be useful for a quick ping or pointer, but on the other hand threads can quickly become unwieldy. Larger/deeper discussions flow better as email and mailing list archives make for better discoverability. Slack can also be quite a distraction. While it looks

Re: Site documentation

Good to see mailing list activity. Note that #2 and #3 are not exclusive. The asf-site branch is currently set to serve the site, it does not need to contain the source. I would also put the site sources into the main branch and then put the generated site into the asf-site branch, so that