Provide a way for not creating items from nested ResultMaps when the items
contain only null values
---
Key: IBATIS-375
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-337?page=all ]
Jeff Butler closed IBATIS-337.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jeff Butler
In SVN. Will be in the next refresh of the site.
Add documentation item to left nav in Get help section to
We discussed this some weeks ago. IIRC, Clinton wanted to do a new release
rather than voting for GA on 2.2.
Jeff Butler
On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2 has been available for
some time and contains several bug fixes over
You might need to select a different mirror. I know the files have been
propogated to some of the mirrors, but not all.
You could also use the backup mirrors at the end of the list.
Jeff Butler
On 12/1/06, Tom Duffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Jeff Butler
iBATIS for Java version 2.3.0 is now available.
This release includes several bug fixes and enhancements. Additionally, this
release offers new support for local caching of prepared statements. Caching
prepared statements can lead to significant performance improvements in many
environments.
Nice job Jeff.
This also marks the first time someone else has done the full build and
deploy cycle of iBATIS. This is a milestone that shows iBATIS is truly a
team effort (i.e. bus factor 1 ;-)
Great job to the whole team on another successful release.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 12/1/06, Jeff
To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago was:
We can vote for GA anytime, even after another release makes it to GA. The
beta, alpha, GA status is always flexible. We could vote for GA on 2.2.
right now actually.
So a little closer to what Brandon is suggesting. However, I'm more
My vote is to leave it the way it is. My conservative, pragmatic and
adventurous sides are all satisfied by having a single GA release as well as
the latest Beta release available for download. 2.2 is available in the
past releases if people want it.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 12/1/06, Jeff Butler
I'm fine with pushing 2.3. But, I had a conversation on the list with
someone who feared upgrading to 2.2 because it wasn't GA. This was,
apparently, a company policy. They need a feature that is available in
2.2but will not upgrade because it is not GA. If we do not make
2.2 GA then their
That's a great point. I've had similar discussions.
How about this: Let's do the vote for 2.2. GA right now. Assuming it
passes (I don't see why not considering how long it's been out), we update
2.1.7 to 2.2 on the website by Monday.
Then, next Friday (7 days) we start the vote for 2.3 GA
10 matches
Mail list logo
