We discussed this some weeks ago. IIRC, Clinton wanted to do a new release rather than voting for GA on 2.2.
Jeff Butler On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2 has been available for some time and contains several bug fixes over 2.1.7. I would also say that 2.2.0 could be made GA. The other thought is that there is no guarantee that 2.3 will be GA quality after we get it out there for 2 weeks, however unlikely that may be. Thanks for getting this all together! B On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and > checksummed. Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist > directories, so I'm stuck right now. I've sent a note to infra@ and as soon > as they get the permission problems resolved, then I'll be able to publish > the release. > > This will be the first iBATIS/Java release that uses the Apache > mirroring structure - I'm going to implement the new Apache release policy > according to the notice the committers received a couple of weeks ago. > > My release plan looks like this: > > 1. Post the 2.3 and 2.1.7 builds to the mirrors. 2.3 will superceed 2.2, > so no need to post it > 2. Label 2.3 as beta, 2.1.7 is still the GA release > 3. Call for a vote for 2.3 GA two weeks after 2.3 is posted > > I'll keep you posted - hopefully I'll get it done tomorrow. > > Jeff Butler > >
