[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-501.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: 2.3.2
Assignee: Clinton Begin
Added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-502.
Resolution: Invalid
You're likely not properly ending your database transactions in a fault
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12590446#action_12590446
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-502:
--
Sorry, I completely screwed up that example
Keep in mind that the whiteboard is just a guideline and not a hard bound
spec. I love to see the innovation that the .NET team comes up with. We
don't want to stifle the opportunities that .NET makes possible that Java
does not allow for, and we also want to learn from Gilles and the others on
Sorry, I forgot to mention this sooner... It's a minor recommendation for
your own sanity.
I suggest avoiding the reverse title case used by iBATIS... It's a decision
I wish I hadn't made. I would suggest simply using Ibator or even better:
ibator. In hindsight, I wish I had used all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12586378#action_12586378
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-500:
--
That's a really weird error... all three
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-466.
Resolution: Won't Fix
As the comments imply, this is not something we can fix... all of the rows
This is a long overdue maintenance release. Fixes about 20 issues and
includes two significant improvements. The first is the elimination of
the Throttle. Originally included to artificially constrain threads,
requests, and transactions to improve performance on certain
infrastructure. It's not as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-491.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Clinton Begin
resultMap support java 5 enum to jdbcType VARCHAR
Hi all,
I've made all of the changes I think we need to roll the release. It will
include a number of bug fixes, and two significant improvements:
* The removal of the Throttle entirely. It created too many problems,
some ours, some yours, but problems either way. Without it, it will be far
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-490.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Clinton Begin (was: Jeff Butler)
When using implicit resultmap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-441.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.1
Assignee: Clinton Begin
Multiple result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-497.
Resolution: Fixed
Bug when add two same length and hashCode SQLs to a batch executor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-435.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Clinton Begin
Bug Using iBATIS 2.3.0 And Spring Framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-487.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Clinton Begin
lazy loading support java.util.Set interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-476.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.1)
Assignee: Clinton Begin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-479.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.1
Typo on com.ibatis.sqlmap.engine.conifg package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-489.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.1
CacheModel.NULL_OBJECT should be Serializable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-485.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Use a PingQuery to ensure connections are valid, or configure your server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-392.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Would break too many existing maps. Try a different SQL Parser.
iBatis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-309.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Was a driver issue
Cannot insert into Database Blob using IBATIS DAO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-413.
Resolution: Invalid
Works as expected for the JavaBeans property standard
Problem for error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580757#action_12580757
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-249:
--
Sorry Abdur, my mistake. I was thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Begin closed IBATIS-496.
Resolution: Fixed
Throttle is removed in 2.3.1. Although you may still find that you have
By I I mean whoever the current build manager is, I think it was last with
Jeff or Larry. :-)
Clinton
From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January-14-08 12:11 PM
To: 'dev@ibatis.apache.org'
Subject: Preparing for iBATIS 2.3.1 release...
Hi all,
I'd like to release
FYI: I haven't forgotten about thisjust ridiculously busy.
I wonder if we should just try to get you commit access?
Clinton
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Brosnan (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October-17-07 1:08 PM
To: dev@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented:
this can be a
nightmare!!!
Please, explain better your idea.
Woody
- Original Message -
From: Clinton Begin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ibatis.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:41 PM
Subject: Deploying Source Code
What does anyone/everyone think
- an annotations can
do that, too.
My gut reaction is that it's not a good idea, but I can't really
quantify why. :-)
Larry
On 10/26/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean deploying your .java files to production alongside your .class
files
and having it available on the classpath
deployed in
this manner may be a non-starter for many. For that reason I'm not sure *I*
would use it. It's almost as bad as a second compile.
Brandon Goodin
On 10/26/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've caught me...and you're the perfect person to have done so. I am
indeed thinking
to improve reflection, have you found a
good parser? The Eclipse parser is excellent, but hard to break out as a
standalone thing. I've been learning antlr in my spare time (5
minutes/week) but it is slow going.
Jeff Butler
On 10/26/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Definitely
Hi all,
Just a note to let you know that there is a Facebook group created for iBATIS.
It should not replace the mailing list for:
A) User support
B) Developer discussions
C) Bug reports
I suggest looking at it as a way of meeting other people who use
iBATIS and share common interests. I'm
.
On 7/8/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've put together a simple survey to help us set the direction for
future versions of iBATIS.
Please fill it out to ensure that iBATIS remains or becomes the
product you want.
It should only take 10 minutes to fill
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523443
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-142:
--
It's only been 2 years man, give us some time!
LOL. It should
Sounds interesting. I look forward to seeing the first demo!
Clinton
On 7/30/07, Mario Ds Briggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to make contributions to the iBatis Data Mapper for Java, so
that it could execute SQL statements using SQLJ also (in addition to JDBC,
as is done
, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've put together a simple survey to help us set the direction for
future versions of iBATIS.
Please fill it out to ensure that iBATIS remains or becomes the
product you want.
It should only take 10 minutes to fill out. The results
Hi everyone,
I've put together a simple survey to help us set the direction for
future versions of iBATIS.
Please fill it out to ensure that iBATIS remains or becomes the
product you want.
It should only take 10 minutes to fill out. The results are not
displayed, but I will publish a summary
Nothing major that I can think of.
On 6/11/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's that time again :)
Aside from the .NET DataMapper/DataAccess releases, do we have
anything of consequence to report?
Our last report was in March. Since the reports do become part of the
Foundation's
This is absolutely fantastic! Thank you, and congratulations.
I will upload these tonight and put up a homepage announcement/reminder of
the various languages that we have documentation for.
Best regards,
Clinton Begin
On 6/8/07, Nobuyuki Inaba (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Japanese
LOL, dude, I've been doing iBATIS Javascript demos at my last few
conferences.
I used a bridge approach. A generic servlet that acts as a gateway to
iBATIS. So you write SQL Map files and config as you normally would. Then
set up the gateway servlet. Done. No Java code.
You can then call
Clinton
On my machine, total build time including tests, reports and docs2
minutes 17 seconds (P4 3GHz/2GB).
Wonder why it's hanging?
Clinton
On 6/5/07, Build Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUILD result
BUILD for IBATIS (#53)
-config)
at this moment the thread are in a wait state and the server hung when reach
the 50 threads
Any Idea??
César
*On Wed, 2 May 2007 08:04:48 -0600, Clinton Begin wrote*
It sounds more like transactions aren't being ended properly. Make sure
you have matching startTransaction/endtransaction
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495387
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-128:
--
rant
I seriously can't believe how bad Java 5 is. That's the most
If it's that serious of an issue, you really should create a new issue.
Don't depend on us seeing a comment in a cosed issue.
Thanks for your contribution to fix this.
Clinton
On 5/13/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see my comments on:
PS: The code you're looking for will likely be in ClassInfo.java
On 5/13/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's that serious of an issue, you really should create a new issue.
Don't depend on us seeing a comment in a cosed issue.
Thanks for your contribution to fix this.
Clinton
It sounds more like transactions aren't being ended properly. Make sure you
have matching startTransaction/endtransaction pairs and make sure the
endTransaction is in a finally{} block.
Though it's likely not the problem, I'd like to get rid of Throttle in an
upcoming version...even if only to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489398
]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-408:
--
If I'm reading this right, this is the intended behavior
Hi everyone.
I've been wanting to eliminate those pesky maxSessions, maxTransaction and
maxRequest settings for a long time. Mostly because they're abused, misused
and misunderstood -- which is my fault. I have never explained them well.
Part of the reason is that there's no good explanation
Not to nag, but are we ever going to move the Confluence space to
cwiki.apache.org?
What would be the benefit to us and our users? I'm happy with Confluence
and the service from Atlassian. The last time we hosted our wiki with ASF
infra, we lost almost all of our links and I think even some
PROTECTED] wrote:
Also a type of skate, a member of the shark family similar to a
stingray.
http://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/nz/kinderpagina/zeebeestje/vleet.jsp
Larry
On 3/4/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind you, Batis is also a particularly ugly moth...
http
? Suggestions?
- Joakim
Clinton Begin wrote:
Here's one of my favourite ones:
http://www.oiseaux.net/oiseaux/passeriformes/images/pririt.molitor.jode.1g.jpg
Clinton
On 3/4/07, *Clinton Begin* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or we could run a mascot contest
:
I liked it too.
So I ran with it ...
http://joakim.erdfelt.com/ibatis-logo-experiment-bird/
Comments? Suggestions?
- Joakim
Clinton Begin wrote:
Here's one of my favourite ones:
http://www.oiseaux.net/oiseaux/passeriformes/images/pririt.molitor.jode.1g.jpg
Clinton
On 3/4/07, *Clinton
Hi all,
I just visited the ActiveMQ site (http://activemq.apache.org/) for the first
time. I was blown away by the site design. Okay okayit's simple. But
I seriously didn't recognize it as an Apache project or an OSS project at
allat first glance I thought it was commercial
monster, or oswd.org (if we're feeling cheap).
Larry
On 3/4/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I just visited the ActiveMQ site (http://activemq.apache.org/) for the
first
time. I was blown away by the site design. Okay okayit's
simple. But
I seriously didn't recognize
Here's one of my favourite ones:
http://www.oiseaux.net/oiseaux/passeriformes/images/pririt.molitor.jode.1g.jpg
Clinton
On 3/4/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or we could run a mascot contest. Free signed copies of iIA for the
winner to sell on ebay. ;-)
I was actually thinking
Mind you, Batis is also a particularly ugly moth...
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/j/Peach%20Blossom.jpg
Clinton
On 3/4/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or we could run a mascot contest. Free signed copies of iIA for the
winner to sell on ebay. ;-)
I was actually thinking
for listening at least. I suppose it is equal one way or
another. Perhaps I will learn something from this :-)
Clinton Begin wrote:
I am not aware of any other project at Apache that
includes a build number as part of their version number.
So let's teach them something together
are for development
distributions only. The build number will be updated for every snapshot
distribution. Once you're ready to attempt an official release, remove
-SNAPSHOT and then you have the next X.Y.Z version.
Paul
Clinton Begin wrote:
The build number is very important...it's the only automated
? If we do not have an
anchor in our source code repository to compare it to what good does it do
us?
Brandon
On 2/17/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
I disagree entirely.
Open any product on your PC today, Java IDE, Visual
Studio...anything. It will have a build
for
tracing back to what? If we do not have an anchor in our source
code repository to compare it to what good does it do us?
Brandon
On 2/17/07, *Clinton Begin* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
I disagree entirely.
Open any product
Hi all,
It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build
to warrant an official vote for Maven support.
+2 = Replace our Ant build entirely with a Maven build.
+1 = Support Maven by including a Maven build alongside our Ant build.
0 = Don't care or I don't know enough
, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build
to warrant an official vote for Maven support.
+2 = Replace our Ant build entirely with a Maven build.
+1 = Support Maven by including a Maven build alongside our Ant build.
0
If that's the case, would it make sense to use Ant for build and Maven
for deploy?
One thing I'll miss with Maven is the tool integration. I imagine I
could get a Maven plugin for IDEA and Eclipse, but Ant is ubiquitous
and works with a lot of other tools.
At least I know Continuum works with
install' from the command line of the project root. See how it
goes. That command will build the ibatis jar and run the unit tests.
Brandon
On 2/14/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't require a shell script now. The .bat and .sh files are
optional. You're perfectly welcome
Really? I think our build is great. We just cloned it for a project
we're working on.
I'm a -1 for Maven for primary build. Ant works fine and I'm pissed
that we need to do all of this to get a frigging pom file and a majic
jar full of Maven meta-bs? Jeeez. If someone else is willing to do
+1 for Slava...oh wait, you all know my opinion already. Do I only get one?
On 2/13/07, Slava Imeshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preference for a build to be self-contained and not to require
to go out to run.
Using Maven will prevent those having no Internet connection
from building
I think there is a bit of hostility here.
I don't sense any hostility...just strong opinions.
If you don't have an internet connection then you are in a sad sad sad state
Except for those who like to work with or on our framework while on an
airplane...or a bus or a trainlaptops are
change
some of the property names. (we did both when we cloned the build for
the new project)
Clinton
On 2/13/07, Larry Meadors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/13/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? I think our build is great. We just cloned it for a project
we're working on.
Ouch
to this list publicly and send Brandon a cake. :-)
Clinton
On 2/13/07, Larry Meadors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HATE COMMENTS?!? Goodin, I'll kick your fat butt! :-D
On 2/13/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is a bit of hostility here.
I don't sense any hostility...just
It only affects people who build iBATIS from source,
So it will only make the developers' lives a living hell.
KIDDING (does that count as provocation?)
With the Struts releases, we also include all the JARs needed to build
the product, which people can install locally.
That would be
Ewwwso why do we have to check in our IDE project files? Is that
a Maven requirement? Any alternative? Is there a Maven ant:ant?
Clinton
On 2/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bgoodin
Date: Tue Feb 13 11:55:34 2007
New Revision: 507187
URL:
OOOH sorry. My bad. :-)
On 2/13/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an ignore not a checkin.
On 2/13/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ewwwso why do we have to check in our IDE project files? Is that
a Maven requirement? Any alternative? Is there a Maven
to the ignore
list...not that it's a problem to do so.
Clinton
On 2/13/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That cake is sounding really good.
On 2/13/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OOOH sorry. My bad. :-)
On 2/13/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an ignore
injection (why? I dunno!). ;-)
Clinton
On 2/11/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't that what constructors are for?
On 2/11/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Absolutely not. :-)
Direct field mapping for the purposes of immutable classes or non-bean
types would
is something I need to turn on or
off? I hope so. I want to enforce my usage to go through methods.
Paul
Clinton Begin wrote:
Okay...
I've made the change. It now uses fields only if a get or set method
doesn't exist. Of course, the decision is independent for get and
set, so if a set doesn't exist
these problems anymore
unless there is a way for iBatis to tell me I forgot my methods. I
really really don't want direct-field access to bite my designs. It
might just be too easy for bugs to get by unless the tool is smarter.
Paul
Clinton Begin wrote:
So far, there's no switch to turn
, as you said, and listen to the
feedback. Thanks Clinton!
Clinton Begin wrote:
I think we need a stronger argument for a switch than I might shoot
myself in the foot. :-)
It's pretty simple to force methods to be called (write them) and to
avoid fields from being loaded in odd cases
ditch them.
Clinton
On 2/9/07, Poitras Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your point is interesting, but wouldn't the () notation break maps
transparency?
-Original Message-
From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 09 February 2007 14:00
To: dev@ibatis.apache.org
Hi all,
I found a few hours tonight to implement direct-to-field mappings. I
don't have any energy left to explain it fully, but it's simple to
use, so here's the summary.
To implement this, I changed the ClassInfo to accept a new pattern of
property access. You can now wrap a field names in
http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/?p=100
section. The
whiteboard can be found on the wiki, or by clicking this direct TinyURL
link: http://tinyurl.com/2tbs46
Best regards,
Clinton Begin
you can use the sql tag to eliminate the duplicate identical
content, if the content is long or you have more than 2 conditions.
otherwise duplicating it isn't the end of the world.
On 1/23/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question should be posted to the user list.
It is not
into these sub
pages:
1. Configuration
2. Validation
3. Dynamic SQL
4. Execution/Result Processing
5. Others???
I think the one page will get very long.
Good start!
Jeff Butler
On 1/9/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
iBATIS 3.0 discussions have begun. A working Whiteboard
Hi all,
iBATIS 3.0 discussions have begun. A working Whiteboard is available to get
us started.
Brandon bugged me all day Monday until I agreed to do a complete brain dump
for 3.0, so that's basically what's on the Whiteboard so far. :-)
I would appreciate the work, and as a team member I'd be honored that you
would think to put this under the iBATIS umbrella.
However, I think it's such a diversion from the central purpose of iBATIS
that it would threaten to blur what iBATIS is.
I would rather see it as a fork. Forks aren't
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-142?page=comments#action_12459718 ]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-142:
--
Niels has an excellent solution. I never thought of that (oh the shame!).
${SELECT_KEY} or something like
+1
On 12/4/06, Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following this conversation:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40ibatis.apache.org/msg02094.html
I'm calling a vote to promote 2.2 to GA status.
Known problems with 2.2:
- Doesn't work with JDBC/ODBC Bridge Driver
Nice job Jeff.
This also marks the first time someone else has done the full build and
deploy cycle of iBATIS. This is a milestone that shows iBATIS is truly a
team effort (i.e. bus factor 1 ;-)
Great job to the whole team on another successful release.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 12/1/06, Jeff
To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago was:
We can vote for GA anytime, even after another release makes it to GA. The
beta, alpha, GA status is always flexible. We could vote for GA on 2.2.
right now actually.
So a little closer to what Brandon is suggesting. However, I'm more
.
Your thoughts - should I post the 2.2 build to the mirrors? That wouldn't
take much effort now that I know how to sign releases (it was a strange trip
into command line hacker heaven).
Jeff Butler
On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago
were for esoteric
issues. I think 2.3 is pretty solid.
Your thoughts - should I post the 2.2 build to the mirrors? That
wouldn't take much effort now that I know how to sign releases (it was a
strange trip into command line hacker heaven).
Jeff Butler
On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin
Awesome stuff Jeff. Thanks for all your hard work.
Clinton
On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and
checksummed. Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist
directories, so I'm stuck right
a little.
Clinton Begin (JIRA) wrote:
Prepared statement caching...Duplicate prepared statement found. This is
likely a bug.
--
Key: IBATIS-369
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira
waiting at least another week or two.
I'm -1 until some of these other issues are resolved one way or another.
Jeff Butler
On 11/20/06, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to release iBATIS 2.3 sometime this week. The changes listed
for the release are as follows:
o
Congratulations on being the first to need an issue or a new feature!
rbatis has been slow on uptake, but is definitely not dead. I've created a
new JIRA project for rbatis, so you can file requests there.
Also feel free to add anything rbatis related to the wiki if you like.
Hi all,Alex has written a blog entry and some proof-of-concept code around configuring iBATIS with Annotations. In his example he used the JCP Ease-of-Development syntax that's been dropped for JDK 6.0/JDBC 4.0.
Alex's example isn't ready for primetime yet, but have a look at what he's done, and
Hi all,Wow, so many amazing contributions these days! Sandeep Jain has written documentation, or what is practically a book, on iBATIS. It's available for free in electronic format.
http://simplerj2ee.com/Have a look and let us all know what you think. Sandeep has entertained the idea of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-349?page=comments#action_12447345 ]
Clinton Begin commented on IBATIS-349:
--
Can you upload the whole file? Not just the patch. Believe it or not, it's
much easier to deal
Hi everyone,I would like to release iBATIS 2.2.1 by the end of the weekend if possible. It's a pretty significant release, probably more than just a X.X.1 releasewe could call it 2.3 if you think that would be more appropriate.
The changes so far are:o DEPRECATED All PaginatedList related
This is the official vote to deprecate both the iBATIS for Java DAO Framework and the iBATIS.NET DataAccess Framework
.
The deprecated frameworks will be removed from the primary download,
archived in the source control system (moved), and the documentation
archived.
The software will be made
101 - 200 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
