Re: [iBATIS3] parameterMap Removed (please)?

2009-06-07 Thread Kai Grabfelder
I would say we should keep them and make it clear in the documentation and the dtd that in most cases inline parameters maps are the better choice... Kai --- Original Nachricht --- Absender: Jeff Butler Datum: 03.06.2009 15:18 You can do this with inline parameter maps now in iBATIS2:

Re: [iBATIS3] parameterMap Removed (please)?

2009-06-03 Thread Rob Sonke
We're using them with Oracle procedures and functions, to specify the in and out modes and their jdbc types. How would you support that? Rob Thomas Duffey wrote: In case it helps you decide I just searched through almost 300 SQL Map XML files for production apps here and not a single one uses

Re: [iBATIS3] parameterMap Removed (please)?

2009-06-03 Thread Jeff Butler
You can do this with inline parameter maps now in iBATIS2: #someParam,jdbcType=VARCHAR,mode=IN# The advanced inline parameter syntax has every option available in a declared parameter map. Jeff Butler On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Rob Sonke r...@tigrou.nl wrote: We're using them with

Re: [iBATIS3] parameterMap Removed (please)?

2009-06-02 Thread Clinton Begin
I think so. At the very least, we could just remove it from the DTD... I'm having a hard time letting go of one of those just in case moments. :-) Interestingly, the code is kind of a mess in the area of parameter maps, as it's different if you specify a parameter map vs. an inline map, due to