Re: SQL query timeout: in progress or abandoned

Hello Ivan, I have updated the PR as per our discussion. Please review and share your feedback. Regards, Saikat On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:20 PM Saikat Maitra wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > I have taken care of review comments and also have shared a question for > the application of default Query

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

Hello Emmanouil, Can you please share more info about the implementation? We have similar implementation for data streamers with Kafka and RocketMQ https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/kafka-streamer https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/rocketmq-streamer Please review and share if you

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

Hi all, By mentioning Pub/Sub I mean Google Cloud's Pub/Sub [1] Yes it is indeed cloud specific. It is the messaging service provided by GCP. I have made the integration with it, but I haven't published it yet (I am waiting for the discussion/ticket and proceed with the contribution). Kind

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

Hello Emmanouil, Are you referring to any specific implementation tailored for a cloud? If I'm not mistaken you were mentioning AWS/GCE. Is there any Github source code? Here is a list of existing integrations with streaming and pub/sub frameworks:

Re: Ignite Community Growth Activities and Twitter

Denis, thank you, > > Would you also keep our events page up-to-date? Sure, I will do this gladly. Sally, nice to meet you! пт, 11 окт. 2019 г. в 00:12, Denis Magda : > Kseniya, welcome to the community and thanks for offering the help with > these activities. Most of us are focused on the

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12284) When service class not found on any server nodes, service not deployed without any error

Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-12284: Summary: When service class not found on any server nodes, service not deployed without any error Key: IGNITE-12284 URL:

Re: Adding experimental support for Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory

Hello Mulugeta, Igniters. Thanks for your interest and efforts in integrating the persistent memory to Ignite. Here are my thoughts on the PR: First of all I was questioning whether we want to use the integration with the pmem library via JNI. Java 14 will have native support for NVME via native

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Hi Denis, In my humble opinion, the security (the sandbox feature is about security, right?) either covers all APIs/subsystems or not. Security should work always and everywhere otherwise it is not security :) > From my point, we should divide the sandbox and features that use it. > Also, I

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

>From my point, we should divide the sandbox and features that use it. The sandbox is fully implemented and has needed tests. Also, I added in the main features of Ignite (cache and compute) the sandbox calls. I don't see any problem to have the sandbox in the master branch and implement

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Hi Denis, Yep, I understand the scope of the ticket, but... I think it is not a good idea to merge partly implemented feature(s) into the master branch. Especially, at this moment. We are at the stage of preparing a new release and I doubt that all improvements, tests (unit tests, integration

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Hello, Slava! The scope of the issue is limited by the following features: - StreamReceiver for DataStreamer; - EntryProcessor; - ComputeJob; - filter and transformer for ScanQuery. But, sure, we should execute any user-defined code in the sandbox on a remote node. Feel free to

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Hello Denis, Anton, Could you please clarify the following aspect? Do we need the same changes/capabilities related to Continuous Queries, Disco listeners, CacheStore Factories etc? Thanks, S. пт, 11 окт. 2019 г. в 12:24, Anton Vinogradov : > Folks, > > As a prereviewer, I'd like to say that

Re: Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Folks, As a prereviewer, I'd like to say that the solution looks good to me, but fresh eyes would be good. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:40 AM Denis Garus wrote: > Hello, Igniters! > > I've raised the PR [1] with the sandbox for AI [2]. > Could somebody review it? > > If you have questions and

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12283) Access restriction to IgniteKernal

Denis Garus created IGNITE-12283: Summary: Access restriction to IgniteKernal Key: IGNITE-12283 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12283 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12282) Access restriction to the internal package of Ignite

Denis Garus created IGNITE-12282: Summary: Access restriction to the internal package of Ignite Key: IGNITE-12282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12282 Project: Ignite

Review needed for IGNITE-11410 Sandbox for user-defined code

Hello, Igniters! I've raised the PR [1] with the sandbox for AI [2]. Could somebody review it? If you have questions and prefer the Slack, I've created the channel [3]. 1. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6707 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11410 3.