Huge +1
I guess jigsaw, "var" and VarHandle features can really improve the
codebase.
чт, 10 дек. 2020 г. в 23:41, Vladimir Steshin :
> My + for java 11
>
> On 08.12.2020 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> > +1 for using java 11.
> >
> >> 8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл
> написал(а):
> >>
My + for java 11
On 08.12.2020 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
+1 for using java 11.
8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл написал(а):
+1
08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" :
Hello!
Andrey's arguments are solid.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
+1, Java 11
I think we should move forward, so java11 seems like a proper choice for 3.
ср, 9 дек. 2020 г. в 10:17, Ivan Bessonov :
> This is an awesome idea.
>
> Honestly, I can't come up with strong technical arguments for Java 11 as a
> source level, I had no chance to work with it long enough, but it
This is an awesome idea.
Honestly, I can't come up with strong technical arguments for Java 11 as a
source level, I had no chance to work with it long enough, but it feels
like a
proper time to move to a "modern" technology. Subjectively I can say that
Java 11 has a lot of good optimization and
+1 for sure. AFAIK, the only thing holding us back from using Java 11 is the
dominance of Java 8, but I'm sure that by the time Ignite 3 is GA, there will
be much fewer Java 8 users if any significant number at all. By the by,
Ignite's sources need minimal effort to be able to be compiled with
+1 for using java 11.
> 8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл написал(а):
>
> +1
>
> 08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" :
>> Hello!
>>
>> Andrey's arguments are solid.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
>>
>>> +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at
+1
08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" :
> Hello!
>
> Andrey's arguments are solid.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
>
>> +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I totally
Hello!
Andrey's arguments are solid.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev
> wrote:
>
> > I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward
> >
>
+1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev
wrote:
> I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward
>
> вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura :
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > We already had some discussion about
I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward
вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura :
> Igniters,
>
> We already had some discussion about using modern Java versions for
> Ignite 3.0 development [1] but we still don't have consensus.
> As I see from this discussion the
Igniters,
We already had some discussion about using modern Java versions for
Ignite 3.0 development [1] but we still don't have consensus.
As I see from this discussion the strongest argument for Java 11 is
the fact that Java 11 is the latest LTS release which will have
premier support until
11 matches
Mail list logo
