Re: Change Ignite download.cgi page to satisfy requirements

2020-04-14 Thread Denis Magda
Maxim, thanks a lot for picking up this task! Glad to see you contributing to the website. - Denis On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:34 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Folks, > > > The Apache Ignite download page has been updated. > Thanks, everyone for the help. > >

Re: Change Ignite download.cgi page to satisfy requirements

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Folks, The Apache Ignite download page has been updated. Thanks, everyone for the help. https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 00:22, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > > I’ve added this files to the ignite svn. > > > 14 апр. 2020 г., в 01:57, Maxim Muzafarov написал(а): > > > >

Re: Change Ignite download.cgi page to satisfy requirements

2020-04-14 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
I’ve added this files to the ignite svn. > 14 апр. 2020 г., в 01:57, Maxim Muzafarov написал(а): > > Folks, > > > As another suggestion, we can place such files (pgp, sha512) here > https://downloads.apache.org/ignite/gce/ (`gce` directory must be > created). I don't have access rights there.

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12898) Server node with CacheStore fails to re-join the cluster: IgniteCheckedException: Cannot enable read-through (loader or store is not provided) for cache

2020-04-14 Thread Alexey Kukushkin (Jira)
Alexey Kukushkin created IGNITE-12898: - Summary: Server node with CacheStore fails to re-join the cluster: IgniteCheckedException: Cannot enable read-through (loader or store is not provided) for cache Key: IGNITE-12898

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Petr, I think it's doable. It has custom `install-jdk` script, so even the latest JDKs can be used. [1] https://github.com/sormuras/bach#install-jdksh On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:31, Petr Ivanov wrote: > > We do not need JDK10 — it is out of support already. > Instead, how about adding JDK14? >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Petr Ivanov
We do not need JDK10 — it is out of support already. Instead, how about adding JDK14? > On 14 Apr 2020, at 17:30, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Folks, > > I forgot to mention one more important thing of this tool. We can > configure build and checks simultaneously for several JDK versions. > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Folks, I forgot to mention one more important thing of this tool. We can configure build and checks simultaneously for several JDK versions. jdk: - oraclejdk8 - openjdk10 - openjdk11 On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 17:17, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Folks, > > +1 Travis-ci > > I see no

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12897) Add .NET api to enabling SQL indexing for existing cache.

2020-04-14 Thread Ivan Daschinskiy (Jira)
Ivan Daschinskiy created IGNITE-12897: - Summary: Add .NET api to enabling SQL indexing for existing cache. Key: IGNITE-12897 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12897 Project: Ignite

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Folks, +1 Travis-ci I see no disadvantages of having multiple CI tools due to: - it's free for open-source and can be disabled at any time without any consequences; - it will free TeamCity from running builds on each PR and TC can focus on tests execution; - we can perform more sophisticated

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12896) excludeNeighbors=true breaks zone-awareness

2020-04-14 Thread Zaar Hai (Jira)
Zaar Hai created IGNITE-12896: - Summary: excludeNeighbors=true breaks zone-awareness Key: IGNITE-12896 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12896 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12895) AlreadyClosedException: this IndexReader is closed in Cluster Query

2020-04-14 Thread Jira
André Schäfer created IGNITE-12895: -- Summary: AlreadyClosedException: this IndexReader is closed in Cluster Query Key: IGNITE-12895 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12895 Project:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
> On another hand, it seems weird to have both TeamCity and Travis And don’t forget MTCGA bot! > 14 апр. 2020 г., в 10:23, Pavel Tupitsyn написал(а): > > We should have PR checks for sure. > > On one hand, I agree with Denis: > - Travis is very easy to set up in GitHub > - Config file

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
We should have PR checks for sure. On one hand, I agree with Denis: - Travis is very easy to set up in GitHub - Config file (travis.yml) is stored in git, which is great On another hand, it seems weird to have both TeamCity and Travis. Thoughts? On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:16 AM Denis Garus

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Denis Garus
Hello! I have seen projects with Travis-ci they look cool. I think Travis-ci is a good solution. вт, 14 апр. 2020 г. в 10:00, Andrey Mashenkov : > Maxim, > > Good idea. I'd add a license check as well. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:14 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > It's

Re: [DISCUSSION] Pull-request checks on GitHub

2020-04-14 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Maxim, Good idea. I'd add a license check as well. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:14 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Igniters, > > It's really `must-have` feature for me to enable Apache Ignite > pull-request status checks on GitHub. Currently we don't have any of > them. The most obvious check for