Re: Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-12 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hi! I propose to add a new MBean linked to DMS that contains the property IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD. That enables configuration through JMX. WDYT? On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 16:52, Eduard Rakhmankulov wrote: > Hi Stanislav, > > I think this is an excellent idea to use di

Re: Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-06 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
, Eduard Rakhmankulov wrote: > Hello, Igniters! > > I suggest changing IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from system > properties to IgniteConfiguration. > This configuration is effectively cluster-wide (because only the > coordinator's configuration matters when the heuristic

Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-06 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello, Igniters! I suggest changing IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from system properties to IgniteConfiguration. This configuration is effectively cluster-wide (because only the coordinator's configuration matters when the heuristic with this property applies). It is easier to validate that

Re: Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-17 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
> IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD should also be deprecated. > > Thanks, > Stan > > > On 13 May 2021, at 14:43, Eduard Rakhmankulov > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Further investigation has showed, that there is a boolean system property > >

Re: Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-11 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
h the internals to re-read the > property > > from DMS every time of course). > > > > WDYT? > > > > Stan > > > > > On 6 May 2021, at 16:35, Eduard Rakhmankulov > > wrote: > > > > > > Some addition. > > > >

Re: Change IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD from System property to Configuraton

2021-05-13 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Rakhmankulov wrote: > Hi! > > I propose to add a new MBean linked to DMS that contains the property > IGNITE_PDS_WAL_REBALANCE_THRESHOLD. > That enables configuration through JMX. > > WDYT? > > > On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 16:52, Eduard Rakhmankulov > wrote:

welcome message

2021-04-15 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello Ignite Community! My name is Eduard. I want to contribute to Apache Ignite, my JIRA username *erixon*. Thanks! -- Best regards, Eduard.

Welcome letter

2021-04-15 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello Ignite Community! My name is Eduard. I want to contribute to Apache Ignite, my JIRA username *erixon*. Thanks! -- Best regards, Eduard.

Re: Welcome letter

2021-04-16 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Thank you so much! On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, 18:15 Denis Magda, wrote: > Hi Eduard, > > Welcome to the community! I see that someone has already added you to the > contributors' list in JIRA. Good luck, pick your ticket! > > - > Denis > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021

IGNITE-15678

2021-10-12 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello, Ivan! You've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15678 recently, but after that C++ suites on TC suffer constant timeout [1][2]. Could you investigate what can be done to optimize test execution time? 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Custom service proxy context

2021-10-08 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Dictionary) in this case. > > пт, 8 окт. 2021 г. в 14:21, Eduard Rakhmankulov : > > > > Hi, Pavel > > > > Is it possible to provide type-safe API for ServiceProxyContext ? > > I think constructions like int arg1 = ctx.attribute("arg1"); are error > > p

Re: [DISCUSS] Custom service proxy context

2021-10-08 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hi, Pavel Is it possible to provide type-safe API for ServiceProxyContext ? I think constructions like int arg1 = ctx.attribute("arg1"); are error prone. Can we make something like this : //Signature with two generic params which allow the compiler to check if the service will be called with

Re: Running TCBot across a PR

2021-10-04 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hi Raymond! Please try to `re-run possible blockers`, TCBot UI has that button on the right top on your PR's page. Usually one retry is enough, else need to investigate why tests are failing (the ones TCBot has defined as possible blockers). Check whether those tests are failing in master, in

Re: [DISCUSSION] @Nullable/@NotNull annotation usage in Ignite 3

2021-12-17 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
+1 for option No. 2. On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 12:10, Maksim Timonin wrote: > Hi! > > There is a pretty popular project NullAway [1] that checks code of a > project in compile-time for possible NPE. AFAIK, it works only with the > "@Nullable" annotation. I think we can try to add this check to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add SystemRegionMetricsEnabled property on DataStorageConfiguration.

2021-11-25 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Folks, I have created a new ticket [1] for moving system-region-related-properties to its own class. I will be pleased with your feedback on this topic. 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15998 On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 19:58, Eduard Rakhmankulov wrote: > Hi, Andrey! > >

[DISCUSSION] Add SystemRegionMetricsEnabled property on DataStorageConfiguration.

2021-11-02 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello, Igniters! At the moment metrics on system region are disabled on node start. User-defined regions can be tuned to have enabled metrics via region configuration (org.apache.ignite.configuration.DataRegionConfiguration#setMetricsEnabled) To enable metrics on system region users should use

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add SystemRegionMetricsEnabled property on DataStorageConfiguration.

2021-11-02 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
egionConfiguration > field could be introduced which could be DataRegionConfiguration type > or special SystemDataRegionConfiguration type in case if we want to > limit access to the system data region parameters. > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:42 PM Eduard Rakhmankulov

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add additional 3rd party libraries to Ignite 3 Code style and practices

2022-05-18 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hi, Igniters! I am really glad about the 140 symbol column limit. But aside from possible vulnerabilities mentioned above I have other concerns, which may affect some future users. Micronaut is a rather popular framework. Are we planning some OSGI support (or custom classloader magic) so users