Re: Squeasel and Mustache - "important" or "just an innocent embedded dependency"

Feels very much in the "innocent" camp to me. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Yeah, I don't think Cloudera owns the copyright to either (Mustache was > written by me, and is hosted on my private Github). Even if they did, I > don't think there's any

Re: Squeasel and Mustache - "important" or "just an innocent embedded dependency"

Yeah, I don't think Cloudera owns the copyright to either (Mustache was written by me, and is hosted on my private Github). Even if they did, I don't think there's any compelling reason to grant the copyright to the ASF. Both components would be replaceable if it was ever required. On 6 October

Re: Squeasel and Mustache - "important" or "just an innocent embedded dependency"

I don't know much about mustache, but as far as Squeasel goes, Cloudera doesn't own the copyright and thus can't contribute it. It's a fork of another project (Mongoose) which switched licensing to an incompatible one once we were already using it. Due to the license switch, we made a copy of the

Squeasel and Mustache - "important" or "just an innocent embedded dependency"

The Impala community, with our mentors, should decide if we should request from CLoudera na additional software grant for our thirdparty components. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d0c3482cccb3d8bc0a121c14bd269c98fb078213e79432ad164d4e62@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Mustache and