I suspect we can consider this a positive vote, as a result does it make sense
to move on to the general@incubator vote?
On 2018/01/04 17:49:43, Gunnar Tapper wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> > I think
+1
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's
> not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a
> consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have
I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but
that's not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or
not) is a consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot
have more active oversight than active contributors.
Unfortunately contributions were
Hi,
I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project I
don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I have some
doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the
On 2017-11-07 21:56, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Just want to point out. Podlings retire, they don't go to the attic. The
> > same concepts apply though.
>
> The code is still moved to the attic right? I never been involved in an
> incubating project
Hi All,
I understand that i am just a newbie for this project, and you guys might
have spent tons of time on it already. That's the part the make me upset
that we are going to leave a project to be retired/attic just cause. I
guess there must be quite a lot of devs like me still want to
+1
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Barbara Malta Gomes <
barbaramaltago...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On 11/07/2017 08:25 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, we have had several days to