[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-377) how to excute 'show devices' and 'show timeseries' in python?

qinhaiqiang created IOTDB-377: - Summary: how to excute 'show devices' and 'show timeseries' in python? Key: IOTDB-377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-377 Project: Apache IoTDB

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

Hi , I have noticed this issue. The incorrect evaluation is a bug in the function of deleting storage group, and deleting timeseries doesn’t have this issue. While deleting sg, it just subtracts the num of sg in IoTDBConfigDynamicAdapter, but not subtracts the sum of timeseries in

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

1. Is there any side-effect if you remove it? 2. How to solve the incorrect evaluation when you delete some time series is still not mentioned. --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao 于2019年12月19日周四 下午2:16写道： > It

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-376) Metric module is not enabled when calling executeQueryStatement()

Xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-376: - Summary: Metric module is not enabled when calling executeQueryStatement() Key: IOTDB-376 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-376 Project: Apache

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

It is in the restart process, the check could be omitted.

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

Hi, > After restart IoTDB, it recalculates the timeseries one-by-one and prints a lot of debug logs. I suggest accepting the register without checking parameters because it is already checked before. What is the meaning of "I suggest accepting the register without checking parameters because it

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

Hi, This is a crucial problem that most of our users may face, and it will leave them a bad impression of IoTDB. We need to quickly fix this problem, whether by relaxing the check, giving more hints, or disabling the parameter by default. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Jialin Qiao (Jira) 于2019年12月19日周四

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-375) Bug in parameter adapter

Jialin Qiao created IOTDB-375: - Summary: Bug in parameter adapter Key: IOTDB-375 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-375 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions:

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-374) Query performance problem when using Python client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiangdong Huang closed IOTDB-374. - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.9.0) Resolution: Not A Bug > Query performance problem when

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-374) Query performance problem when using Python client

Xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-374: - Summary: Query performance problem when using Python client Key: IOTDB-374 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-374 Project: Apache IoTDB

Re: [jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-319) java deadlock (not sure how to reproduce)

OK, so it should be affected in 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT and fixed in 0.9.0. --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao 于2019年12月18日周三 下午7:56写道： > Hi, > > Yes, already fixed in 0.9.0-RCx > > Jialin Qiao > > Xiangdong Huang

Re: [jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-319) java deadlock (not sure how to reproduce)

Hi, Yes, already fixed in 0.9.0-RCx Jialin Qiao Xiangdong Huang 于2019年12月18日周三 下午7:37写道： > Hi, > > Is this issue affected in 0.9.0 and fixed in 0.9.0? > > Best, > --- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Jialin

Re: [jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-319) java deadlock (not sure how to reproduce)

Hi, Is this issue affected in 0.9.0 and fixed in 0.9.0? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao (Jira) 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:35写道： > > [ >

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'IoTDB Website [null] [88]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'IoTDB Website [null] [88]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB%20Website/88/;>IoTDB Website [null] [88]"

Re: [REMINDER] JIRA should be closed after the PR is merged :)

That's great Jialin! I received a lot of Jira-report emails. It's looks pretty nice for current JIRAs status. :) Best, Jincheng Jialin Qiao 于2019年12月18日周三 下午4:10写道： > Hi, > > I have gone through the open issues and closed those already fixed, and you > should have received the Jira-report

Re: Please do me a favor :)

Great, thanks for your kindly help :) Jialin! Best, Jincheng @sunjincheng121 Jialin Qiao 于2019年12月18日周三 下午4:05写道： > Hi, > > Thanks for reminding, I have finalized the release of 0.9.0, 0.8.1 and > 0.8.2. > IOTDB-268 is a new feature and IOTDB-344 is an

Re: [REMINDER] JIRA should be closed after the PR is merged :)

Hi, I have gone through the open issues and closed those already fixed, and you should have received the Jira-report email bombing already :D Thanks, Jialin Qiao jincheng sun 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:09写道： > Hi Committers & PPMC, > > I found that some of JIRAs have not be close even the PR already

Re: Please do me a favor :)

Hi, Thanks for reminding, I have finalized the release of 0.9.0, 0.8.1 and 0.8.2. IOTDB-268 is a new feature and IOTDB-344 is an environmental problem, which is not a bug inside IoTDB. They are not solved, so I removed the fixed version in these two issues and tag the affected version of

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

I see, thanks for your explanation for IOTDB-300[1] and double check the IOTDB-268[2] Jialin! :) Best, Jincheng @sunjincheng121 [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-300 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-268 Jialin Qiao