Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-03 Thread Lei Rui
@jincheng sun Thanks for your kind sharing. Regards, Lei Rui On 1/3/2020 16:01,jincheng sun wrote: I see. Thanks for your feedback! Lei Rui & Justin! As I know, Both Apache Beam[1] and Apache Flink[2] carry website updated PRs when bring up the release votes. This approach benefits Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-03 Thread jincheng sun
I see. Thanks for your feedback! Lei Rui & Justin! As I know, Both Apache Beam[1] and Apache Flink[2] carry website updated PRs when bring up the release votes. This approach benefits Apache Beam and Apache Flink as the update changes of Beam and Flink are a little more complicated compare with

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-02 Thread Lei Rui
Hi, No need +1. I don't think it's a good practice, because if the released file doesn't exist, how can people review a PR like [1] where there are download links in it waiting to be checked, e.g.,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I mean that prepare the PR when bring up the VOTE, then people can review > the PR ASAP. we can merge it when vote has passed and 24 hours later after > the release . You could but I don’t see any great need, webpages are easily fixed if there is an issue. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-02 Thread jincheng sun
> No. You should only update the website after the IPMC vote has passes, the file put into the Apache mirrors and you waited 24 hours or so for the release to propagate. I mean that prepare the PR when bring up the VOTE, then people can review the PR ASAP. we can merge it when vote has passed

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-02 Thread Lei Rui
Thank Justin for the quick reply. Regards, Lei Rui On 1/3/2020 11:43,Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Do you think that when bring up a release VOTE, we need to add the PR of update the website in VOTE thread? The changes of the PR would be similar with No. You should only update the website after

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Good find.  I like the idea of a ticket to keep improving these types of things. On 1/1/2020 10:01 PM, Xiangdong Huang wrote: > Hi, > > using `find **/src -type f -exec grep -i "copyright" {} \; -print | sort > -u`, many apache header format issues can be found.. > > e.g., > 1. showTTLPlan.java >

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

2020-01-01 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi, using `find **/src -type f -exec grep -i "copyright" {} \; -print | sort -u`, many apache header format issues can be found.. e.g., 1. showTTLPlan.java 2. all files for QueryMetricUI function... 3. All scala files are using /** so the blank space is two chars while it is one char in all java