Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi, Correction: >The vote PASSES with 18 +1 votes It should be 17 votes. (7 votes from committers). Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangdong Huang 于2020年6月24日周三 上午9:23写道： > Hi, > > > The vote closes now as

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi, The vote closes now as more than 72hr have passed. The vote PASSES with 18 +1 votes: - 6 (+1 non-binding) votes from the PPMC, Jialin Qiao, Tian Jiang (JT), Tianan Li (李天安), Rong Kang (康荣), Jinrui Zhang （张金瑞）, Lei Rui （Ray） - 3 (+1 binding) vote from the IPMC, Justin Mclean,

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi, There’s an option the sign a release with multiple keys but few projects do that, and it’s usually just the release manager. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file:

Hi Xiangwei, I vote for [1] since it’s more clear and in alignment. Best, --- Zesong Sun School of Software, Tsinghua University 孙泽嵩 清华大学 软件学院 > 2020年6月23日 23:31，Xiangdong Huang 写道： > > Hi, > > Also vote for the first format. > > By the way, can we add more

Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file:

Hi, Also vote for the first format. By the way, can we add more info, e.g., - the ratio of reading from (metadata and data) cache - how many chunks that just the headers are read. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi Chris, > I personally would be a little hesitant to do it remotely ;-) Well, I agree to doing that face to face in a physical meeting, but it is a little hard in the current COVID-19 situation... (so we can postpone that.) But I wonder even all committers having signed PGP keys, how to use

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi Xiangdong, well usually a key-signging is usually a physical meeting where you go with your passport to be 100% sure you're talking to the right person and signing the right person's key. I personally would be a little hesitant to do it remotely ;-)

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi all, Thank all of you to attend the vote (maybe this is the first time that we receive more than 15 votes). It is due to all of our mentors (and IPMCs) keep to appealing for more PPMCs joining it. It is also due to all active contributors in the community. By the way, I notice that Chris

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

+1 (binding) IPMC Chris Would be great if the web-of trust could be extended to IoTDB RMs ... please have some of you attend one of the Apache key-signing parties as soon as there are ones again [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email [OK]

回复： [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

+1 from contributor The source release: incubating in name [ok] apache headers [ok] signatures and hashes [ok] DISCLAIMER [ok] LICENSE and NOTICE [ok] could compile from source: ./mvnw.sh clean install [ok] The binary distribution: signatures and hashes [ok] start in mac, jdk8 [ok] statements

Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file:

Hi, guys Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here. > Hi, guys I'd like to get a little advice from you. The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log file: [1] - Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205

[VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file:

Hi, xiangwei I prefer the first one. vote for [1]. Best, --- Yuan Tian

Re: I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-736 Query performance tracing

Hi, guys I'd like to get a little advice from you. The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log file: [1] - Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root Query Id: 2 - Number of series

Re:Re: I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-627 delete time range

Hi Jialin, Thanks for the reminder! I will make sure to use Long.MIN_TIME as the lower bound in my code. 在 2020-06-23 15:52:58，"Jialin Qiao" 写道： >Hi, > >Thanks! One thing we need to pay attention, we support time < 0. >So It's better to record a [Long.MIN_TIME, T] for time <= T > >Bests,

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

+1 from PPMC. There are two small problems in README though. (1) The scripts in server/target/iotdb-server-0.10.0/sbin or cli/target/iotdb-cli-0.10.0/sbin are not executable by default. Therefore, before running the command "nohup sbin/start-server.sh >/dev/null 2>&1 &" as guided in README,

Re: I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-627 delete time range

Hi, Thanks! One thing we need to pay attention, we support time < 0. So It's better to record a [Long.MIN_TIME, T] for time <= T Bests, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Wei Shao" > 发送时间: 2020-06-23 15:31:45 (星期二) > 收件人:

I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-627

Hi all, I submitted a PR[1] to support range delete for a timeseries. JIRA issue is [2]. Now the "delete from ..." SQL support specifying a range in the where expression. The where expression may contain Lt/LE, Gt/GE, EQ, AND with two Lt/LE, Gt/GE, EQs. The deletion range is represented by

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi Jinrui, > + 1 from committer. You are also, a PPMC... Anyway, thanks for the vote. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 张金瑞 于2020年6月23日周二 下午2:41写道： > + 1 from committer. > > > I have checked these items on MacOS

Re:[VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

+ 1 from committer. I have checked these items on MacOS Sierra 10.12.5: The Chinese version README_ZH.md The Apache LICENSE in files. The basic build and package commands mvn clean package -DskipTests The commands to start/stop server and client. sbin/start-server.sh sbin/start-cli.sh -h

Re: I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-736 Query performance tracing

Hi，Jialin Thank you for your explanation. Jialin Qiao 于2020年6月23日周二 下午2:07写道： > Hi, > > >4. the number of chunks, and average size of each chunk. > > Thanks, just an explanation, the average size of chunk is the average > number of data points in each chunk. > For now, the query

Re: I've submitted a PR for issue IOTDB-736 Query performance tracing

Hi, >4. the number of chunks, and average size of each chunk. Thanks, just an explanation, the average size of chunk is the average number of data points in each chunk. For now, the query performance highly depends on the number of chunks need to read. So measuring the chunk size is