Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating TsFile as an independent Apache project?

Hi, If enough people on the initial PMC know the ASF process well, there would be no need to go through the Incubator but go straight to TLP. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Give The “Contributor of The Month” Award a Try

You could just recognise contributors by voting them in as committers On Fri, 5 Feb 2021, 12:34 Willem Jiang, wrote: > I think it could be more important to recognize the contribution > instead of just making a list with numbers. > We may say personal thanks to those who provide great help to >

Re: Happy new year!

HI, Happy new year everyone - although it’s a bit early for some people :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: Propose to use some robots provided in Github's Marketplace to help us improve the efficiency of project maintenance

Hi, Also be aware that due to a recent security issue the following now applies applies to GitHub actions: "Actions in this workflow must be: created by GitHub, verified in the GitHub Marketplace, within a repository owned by apache or match the following: adoptopenjdk/*, apache/*,

Re: Propose to use some robots provided in Github's Marketplace to help us improve the efficiency of project maintenance

HI, How will these bots get access to the repos? Infra tightly controls what has access and it be be best to run it past Infra to see if they see any issues first with these bots. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discussion] Suggestion of initiating the “Community Mentors” Project

Hi, > I think all committer/PMC and enthusiastic contributors could be a mentor > without vote. Yes any committer or PMC member should be helping onboard new people. If you have a large number of people to onboard, improving the documentation on how they can contribute and where they can get

Re: [Discussion] Suggestion of initiating the “Community Mentors” Project

Hi, I be curious to know why this needs to be formalised like this. People can help out as needed / when required, having a role like this may actually stop others (who are not recognised as mentors) from helping. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.11.1 RC1 release

Hi, > Please ignore the previous -1 vote. That is a mistake… It’s fine to change you vote (unlikely elections). Vote early and vote often! Thanks, Justin

Re: [MEETING] Apache IoTDB 2nd Weekly Meeting

Hi, > We successfully held the first online meeting two weeks ago. > According to the conclusion of the meeting, we will have the second online > meeting > this Sunday (2020-11-22 21:00:00 in Beijing Time). I don’t see what was discussed being brought back to the mailing list. Was this one?

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] A new repository for Go client

Hi, you can create new repos here: https://selfserve.apache.org Justin

Re: Hello, everyone. I am Jesse Zhou

Hi Jesse, Nice to meet you. All contributions are valuable and you don’t need to know how to code to become a contributor in this project. Non-code contributions are more than welcome. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Start the graduation process

Hi, +1 (binding) Congratulations on making it this far, and there's lots to like about how the project has adopted to following the Apache way, in making release and recognising merit. I particularly like how the project has managed 3rd party downloads, as a lot of projects don’t do it this

Re: [Discuss] [Vote] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, > Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be > a defacto +1 on the IPMC level? There is also an alternative voting method, which with the IPMC permission basically skips the IPMC runs once a release is in good shape. It has as far as I know has only been used

Re: [Discuss] [Vote] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, > Should the IPMC consider a vote by a mentor who is an IPMC member to be > a defacto +1 on the IPMC level? So if 3 mentors voted on the release > vote, why even bring it to the IPMC? Is there a veto with PPMC releases? There are no vetos on releases but an important issue might be found

Re: [Discuss] [Vote] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, > and there must be more positive than negative votes. In short PPMC != PMC, but if 72 hours have passed then I’d put this release candidate

Re: share a command to check the license compatibility problem

Hi, That's a good idea and thanks for sharing how you found it. Just a word of caution something like this is not going to pick up all Category X licenses and may be confused by things that are dual licensed. Automation and checks like this can be very helpful (I use a lot of similar ones

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.10.1 (incubating) RC1 release

Hi, > -1 from contributor > > Check third party dependencies [Not OK] > hive-connector’s dependencies(hive-serde -> orc-core ) use GPL 2.0 license, > which incompatible with apache 2.0 license > (Remove the orc-core dependency in hive-serde and use orc-core 1.6 is ok ) Excellent work on

Re: [Weekly Report] IoTDB Weekly News (2020-07-04~2020-07-12)

Hi, > [Big Event] > # We held the first online discussion yesterday, looking forward to more > attendances next time. It would be good if the detail and what was discussed was shared with this list. Having meetings like disadvantages those who can not attend sure to time zone or other

ApacheCon @Home 2020 call for papers closes in 2 days!

Hi, Only a couple of days to go before to call for papers closes for ApacheCon @Home 2020 on Monday. The Incubator will be running a track at this online conference, so if you're thinking of submitting something, please don't delay. We'll accept talks on the Apache incubator itself, and

Re: CFP for IoTDB on ApacheCon 2020 @Home

Hi, Both of those sound interesting, call for presentation ends on Monday, so don’t forget to get them in :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] discuss about graduation of Apache IoTDB (incubating)

Hi, I think the project have made very good progress, but it might be a little bit early to graduate. I’ve have a look over things in a little more detail over the next couple of days and see if that changes my mind. Thanks, Justin

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi, With some keys it may be a little easier than others as if they are from an apache address there is a higher implicit degree of trust. For example I’ve met Julian in person in the past and would sign his key online (hint hint). Justin

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4 release

Hi, There’s an option the sign a release with multiple keys but few projects do that, and it’s usually just the release manager. Justin

Re: [Discuss]A demo site running iotdb

Hi, > We have applied a VM already. iotdb-vm.apache.org. Excellent plan and sorry I missed that. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss]A demo site running iotdb

Hi, > This is just a test on my personal server. If there is no problem, the > project will be launched on the official server No problem at all. Just thought I might mention that the name may mean something else to people outside of China. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss]A demo site running iotdb

Hi, > http://tryiotdb.666love.cn/ You may want to consider another domain name. I understand 666 is considered lucky but it has other meanings outside of China. [1] The project can ask for a VM from Infra and host it there and perhaps use tryiotdb.iotdb.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.3 (Incubating) RC1 release

Hi, Only 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1’s than -1) to make a release. It is good if more people look at it as they may catch something the others missed. Most votes on release only get 3-5 votes so that’s fine. Re the PPMC this can be adjusted on graduation, it’s usually done by asking

Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"

HI, > The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we > still need a vote? Well it depends on what you changed and where else you put it [1][2][3][4] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition 2.

Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"

Hi, > Julian reported that there were some issues in our docker image with tag > "0.9.1" [1] (though I did not reproduce any issues). > And, he provided a fixed version [2]. I tried the fixed version and it > works also well. Therefore, I uploaded it to docker hub tag with > "0.9.1-jre8" [3]. If

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.2 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - all ASF files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.9.2 (incubating) RC1 release

Hi, It’s good to have a a key nn the web of trust but it not required, having a key from an apache.org address and a download from a location that only apache people can upload to is generally enough :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.9.2 (incubating) RC1 release

Hi, I would put this in the that OK to fix in the next release type of issue, but it is up to you. Thanks, Justin

Re: About the security issues that mqtt-server is turned on by default

Hi Off by default seem the safe option to me. Thanks, Justin

Re: DEPENDENCIES file in source release package

HI, > If the file is generated by Maven, then it may have no apache-header, and > then we need to modify the apache-rat-checker plugin. If it not source it doesn’t need to have a header. A list of dependancies generated by a program would not be covered by copyright. Thanks, Justin

Re: DEPENDENCIES file in source release package

Hi, DEPENDANCIES isn’t needed in an ASF release but it nice information to know, so you may want to include it. Either way not an issue IMO. Thanks, Justin

Re: Shepherd Comments

HI, You might want to remove that off the link to the foundation: > rel="noopener noreferrer” Justin

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-533) tag 'latest' for IoTDB image in docker hub

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051671#comment-17051671 ] Justin Mclean commented on IOTDB-533: - The latest tag need to point to teh latest release version

Re: [QUESTION] The roster page shows "not listed as an incubator committer" message

Hi, > BTW: There is no mention in the new committer process document [1] of > adding the committer of the incubator project to the incubator Committee. It should happen automatically I think, I’ve never had to do this before. it may depend on what was put in the ICLA? Thanks, Justin

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, > Hi Justin, How about wait them one more day? We can give them a little more time than that, but it needs o be done. Thanks, Justin

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, OK some time has passed and the furrowing accounts still needs to be corrected/people subscribe to the private mailing list: Gaofei Cao Jinrui Zhang Kun Liu Rong Kang Stefanie Zhao Also a new PPMC member Jim Wang needs to sign up to the private list. If this is not corrected then I think

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, Rong Kang still needs to subscribe. Theses people still need to update their accounts to include these emails addresses: • cg...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn • jinrui.zh...@microsoft.com • xyzha...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn I have removed these subscription

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

H > But you are not on the PPMC list now. > As you are an initial committer, I will add you to the list directly. (Is > that ok? @Justin) That’s fine. Thanks, Justin

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, There is a ICLA on file fro Chen Wang (but I’m not sure if it’s the same person). There no ICLA on file for Jianmin Wang or Dai Hui, well under those names anyway. Thanks. Justin

Re: PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, > Case one: > Gaofei Cao -> cg...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn > Jinrui Zhang -> jinrui.zh...@microsoft.com > Stefanie Zhao -> > xyzha...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn These people need to edit

PPMC subscription to private mailing list

Hi, It a requirement for the PPMC to be signed up to the private mailing list. So far these PPMC members are currently not subscribed*: Gaofei Cao Jinrui Zhang Julian Feinauer Kun Liu Rong Kang Shuo Zhang Stefanie Zhao We also have a large

Re: [DISCUSS] Add the components definition in JIRA template

Hi, > When our community grows stronger, each\ module may have some specific person > in charge. No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area. Thanks, Justin

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Enable github issue

Hi, > Jialin opened a vote for enabling github issue and 3 days passed [1]. The vote did not of passed, the vote text said: "The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if at least three +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes.” (Ehich is a little unusual as that how you vote on

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, > I mean that prepare the PR when bring up the VOTE, then people can review > the PR ASAP. we can merge it when vote has passed and 24 hours later after > the release . You could but I don’t see any great need, webpages are easily fixed if there is an issue. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, > Do you think that when bring up a release VOTE, we need to add the PR of > update the website in VOTE thread? The changes of the PR would be similar > with No. You should only update the website after the IPMC vote has passes, the file put into the Apache mirrors and you waited 24 hours

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashed correct - disclaimer exists - license and notice all good - all source files have asf headers - no unexpected binary files - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

Hi, I think he may of been joking, but it often hard to tell in email. It currently 2020 now, what you release soon will be copyright 2020 no matter what you put down as the year, but it’s nice if the year matches. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Enrich information of project committers in IOTDB website

Hi, > - Who is permitted to vote, and which kind of vote is binding? Well technically no votes are actually binding if you are a podling, only PMC votes are binding sat Apache projects so you could take that to mean Incubator PMC votes. That being said most podlings treat PPMC votes as binding

Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Hi, Congratulations! And also good to see that other Apache project mentioned. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Enrich information of project committers in website

Hi, You can call a vote if you want but I don’t think any is needed, lazy consensus i.e. as long as no one speaks up against it it is fine to go ahead. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Enrich information of project committers in website

Hi, > But I don't know why this information was originally added, maybe > @Xiangdong know more about this. :) It can be for a number of reasons, some projects which were started by one company may want to show how diverse they have become and highlight that. In some cases some popular projects

Re: [DISCUSS] Enrich information of project committers in website

HI, > - Organization - The organization(school, company) People contribute as individuals not who they work for so it may be best to leave that information out, even if some projects put it in. Thanks, Justin

Re: Maintain user roles of IoTDB Jira

Hi, > I found that the committer information(Number of person) is not > synchronized between [1] and [2] pages. :) It up to the :PMC to do that. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Discuss] about collecting info to know who are using IoTDB

HI, > I thought it is common... e.g., Hadoop and Spark also have the similar pages > [1] and [2]. It’s common in a certain group of projects. Spark and Hadoop are not the best examples for podlings to copy from for a number of reasons. Just because they do something doesn’t mean you should.

Re: [Discuss] about collecting info to know who are using IoTDB

Hi, > I notice that ShardingSpehere incubating project has a page for collecting > who are using IoTDB[1]. They use github issue to collect the data [2]. I not sure this is that useful, people contribute to ASF projects as individuals not companies. While it nice to know your project is being

Re: [jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-150) Try some other web fonts

Hi, Just curious why this was closed as “Wont Do” with no explanation. Thanks, Justin

Re: Docker image uploaded under the account of apache

Hi, > I understand that request but that isn't a graduation issue if someone > doesn't listen to them. But they do need to contact them and look out for issues like this, I didn’t say that there needs to be no branding issues at graduation=, just that the podling is aware of any major ones and

Re: Docker image uploaded under the account of apache

Hi, > None of that turns them into policemen of brand infringements. Perhaps reread [1] it's quite clear on the subject. Also see [2] which asks them to be exactly that. From [2]: "PMCs are expected to manage this process. If a third party does not respond favorably to the PMC's requests, or

Re: Docker image uploaded under the account of apache

Hi, > For example, in my previous Repo [1], I wrote a short description " Apache > IoTDB (incubating) docker images", is that ok for a personal maintained > Repo? That's OK but could be better e.g. You could link to the official IoTDB site, note that it’s an incubating project, and include

Re: Docker image uploaded under the account of apache

Hi, > I disagree this is a graduation issue. If the project didn't set them up > and they are doing branding correctly, the issue should be handed off to > brand to followup. See [1]. I can can point to a recent podling graduation attempt that were unsuccessful because of this. That being

Re: Docker image uploaded under the account of apache

Hi, https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/iotdb looks good to me. We may have some branding/trademark issues with: https://hub.docker.com/r/xingtanzjr/iotdb https://hub.docker.com/r/fudanyuan/iotdb

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.2 RC2 release

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - signatures and hashes file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Can compile from source In the license file you have "following class is modified from Maven Wrapper” twice. I still don’t

Re: Pypi distribution for IoTDB Python Client API

Hi, Looks good to me. Thanks, Justin

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > So I wouldn't explicitly mention any of these branding issues. Yep agree, it more issues of people misusing the Apache projects name. Thanks, Justin

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > How about the following: > > Required Name Search is done. > On Google Search: > 1. There is a dataset called "iotdb" (Internet of Things Database, from > http://www.green-ic.org/). The last update date is 2017-08-16. > 2. There was a project called IoTDB, whose website is iotdb.org.

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > Looks fine up to now. I know a name search has been done, A quick google search shows a number of minor issues, might be a couple you want to deal with. Thanks, Justin

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > I will move the report to confluence tomorrow after @JialinQiao finishing > releasing 0.9.0. > > If Jialin can not finish the release tomorrow, I think I have to remove > related content… The report can be updated before the board meets or you can just put it in the next report, in

Re: Question about a mix of Unix and windows new lines and extra blank spaces in ASF headers.

Hi, > For others, they look different because they are from different file > formats, e.g., java file with /***/, bat file with @REM, antlr g file with > //, script file with #. Look closer…. (+ some characters may of been translated in the email) Thanks, Justin

Re: Question about a mix of Unix and windows new lines and extra blank spaces in ASF headers.

Hi, >> I did notice a mix of unix and windows new lines, you might want to fix > that. This is also a very minor slight inconsistency with the ASF headers > (extra spaces in some). Compare these lines: regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file * regarding copyright

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > I gives a high score for enhancing morale :D. :-) As long as you keep making progress all is good. > We can remove it in the formal report. Indeed we need to try our best to > make it come true. I’ve not issue if it leftest in, it is a report from where the podling things is is along

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, > Some questions like "How does the podling rate their own maturity" is > quite subjective, so I use "from the reporter's view" or "the reporter > thinks". Please comment your idea, and I will modify the draft. I would just answer for the whole PMC and if anyone disagrees they can raise it

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - December 2019

Hi, Good report. Given the number of contributions does the PMC think there’s anyone who could be offered committership? You missed a question about branding, this has been added recently. Please check the template in confluence [1] rather than copying the previous report. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: Pay attention to mentors' comments

Hi, Also note a new question has is being asks, so done;t just copy and paste teh previous report or you might miss it :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: Pay attention to mentors' comments

Hi, Where is this report being worked on? It's best to work on the report in the open so others can contribute. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC3 release

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - no unexpected binary files in course release, although there is this [1] is this needed? - all ASF files have ASF source headers - can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, > But thanks for pointing that out ... I should fix at least the typos ... and > update to the latest Maven-Wrapper version ;-) Why not use their latest? It’s already listed in LICENSE so all you would need to do is replace the file with the latest. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, > Given that I wrote every line of that code, I'm allowed to stick whatever > header I want on it. Are you 100% sure about that for this version of the file? if it was copied from here [1] and it’s the latest then there are 4 contributors to that file over 20 odd commits. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC2 release

e Apache header ... after all, I put it > there. So I think the Apache header doesn't have to be replaced. > > Chris > > > > Am 18.11.19, 21:21 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : > > HI, > > I’m -1 on this as the maven wrapper [1] is still not being handled > cor

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC2 release

HI, I’m -1 on this as the maven wrapper [1] is still not being handled correctly, please read my previous comments. This is a 3rd party file and should not have an ASF header, you can't alter the header of a 3rd party file without permission. Thanks for fixing the other issues. Thanks, Justin

Re: Come back to the community

HI, Signing of a RM keys is not a requirement to make a release, you can make a release without this step. It’s is nice to have this, but is not needed. Thanks, Justin

Re: [disccuss] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 incubating RC1 release

Hi, >> - NOTICE is incorrect "Copyright 2019 and onwards” is not valid to say > > I checked [1], it should be " Copyright 2001-2019 The Apache Software > Foundation” Probably you just want "Copyright 2019” I think, as they are the only years that IoTDB have made a release. >> - NOTICE is

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.9.0 (incubating) RC1 release

Hi, -`1 (binding) due to maven wrapper issue, LICENSE and NOTICE issues, header issues and compiled code in the release. Some of these have been brought up before and occurred before, what can be done to stop them happening again? As I also suggested before it’s best to use the work in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.9.0

HI, > I can help with you at afternoon. Willem Jiang has signed my key last month.\ Again this is not a requirement to make a release and not having done it should not hold anything up. Thanks, Justin

Re: Self check whether the client is compatible with the server

Hi, > Yes some of them are using released version (like 0.8), > but sometimes they found a new feature is introduced in 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT and > they'd like to use that (e.g., register timeseries automatically), > they may try the snapshot version. The answer to that is to make releases more

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.9.0

Hi, > Could someone please help sign my gpg key? The signing step is here: > https://gist.github.com/F21/b0e8c62c49dfab267ff1d0c6af39ab84 This needs to be done in person face to face and requires verifying your ID by some means (usually a government issues ID card). It is not a requirement

Re: Self check whether the client is compatible with the server

Hi, I'm curious to know why are they using snapshot versions rather than released versions? Do you know why, in general users shouldn’t be using snapshot versions. Thanks, Justin

Re: Does anyone know how to monitor the access traffic of our website

gt; while, as now iotdb is in a emerging stage and it may help us to > > improvement the website better. > > > > Best, > > --- > > Xiangdong Huang > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > >

Re: Does anyone know how to monitor the access traffic of our website

Hi, See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-470 Note: "Yes, please avoid using Google Analytics or any other third-party analytics solution that ships our users' data elsewhere. If you need insight, please work with the infrastructure team - we can provide you aggregated views of

Re: Does anyone know how to monitor the access traffic of our website

Hi, There been some discussion on other ASF lists on privacy and the use of services like google analytics. While nothing official has been decided the discussion has tended to suggest to not use these sort of services. Thanks, Justin On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, 10:05 Julian Feinauer, wrote: > Hey, >

Re: [discuss] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC3 release

Hi, > I vote +1 with the same process and results as RC2. it would be best to do that in the vote thread not the discuss thread :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC3 release

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has duplication of text for Maven Wrapper. I am still a little confused where [1] comes from, it seems to come from a 3rd party repo but the header has been changed why is that? - NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, I’m still not sure why you are preparing the maven artefacts before the vote is finished. I guess it good to check that everyone is OK but they can be prepared after as maven is not an official release area. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC2 release

HI, I also note that the file [1] is missing a header, where did this come from? Depending on where it originally come from that might have an impact on LICENCE. Looking inside the jar it seems to imply takari.io but that file does have an header and has done for some time and the code has

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC2 release

HI, > For the jar in the source release, we could address it by adding below > line into .gitignore file. > #skip the maven-wrapper.jar > .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.jar How would that fix it? The release needs to be be made on on the RM machine not from guthub and GitHub doesn’t currently have

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as there is a compiled binary in the source release [2] If you had used the the work in progress disclaimer that would of been allowed. I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes fine - disclaimer exists - LICENSE is fine ( although it would be good

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (incubating) RC2 release

Hi, Repeating what Chris has stated. Why are binary releases being discussed in the vote thread over source releases? Apache projects release source code not binaries. Thanks, Justin

  1   2   >