[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515276
]
Ed Burnette commented on JCR-388:
-
Thanks!
add support for RFC 3253 to the simple server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513897
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
i will attach my patch, where i (hopefully) integrated all comments (see jira).
during
some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513950
]
Ed Burnette commented on JCR-388:
-
I did a smoke test on it and it seems to work for me.
add support for RFC 3253 to
Angela Schreiber wrote:
but that's a different story isn't it? i was talking about the
compliance class (and the method set).
Probably. I just wanted to make sure that no time is spent on something
that is broken in the spec...
RFC 3253 defines a separate behaviour for version-controlled
hi
Clarifying: the difference between a collection and a non-collection
with respect to WebDAV versioning is that the version-controlled state
of a collection *additionally* includes the binding-set (for the
members), but not the members itself.
jup... and that's currently missing.
Hm,
Angela Schreiber wrote:
...
leading to the question: will it cause problems if the dav-client
can 'see' dav VersionHistoryResources and VersionResources that
don't have a corresponding versionable dav resource? or would that
be an negligible inconsistency?
...
That shouldn't be a problem,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513179
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
thanks for the contrib. i will take a look at it as soon as possible.
kind regards
angela
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513183
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
rob, how did you create the patch? i don't manage to apply it using
tortoiseSVN...
add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513222
]
Ed Burnette commented on JCR-388:
-
(Rob and I work together) I believe he created it with Eclipse Team Create
Patch,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513233
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
hm... i don't use eclipse... can you simply create it from svn?
thanks angela
add support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513234
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCR-388:
-
The patch has some extra path components that must be ignored, this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513241
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
? bertrand? what do you want to state here
i already stated in the issue in which format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513245
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on JCR-388:
-
I'm just saying that the patch is indeed in SVN format, the only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513248
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
rob, thanks for the new patch. i commit the changes or provide feedback in case
of a problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500040
]
angela commented on JCR-388:
i reviewed the second patch jeremi uploaded and had a couple of comments. as
far as i know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500164
]
jeremi Joslin commented on JCR-388:
---
no sorry i haven't updated the patch.
add support for RFC 3253 to the simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499948
]
Ed Burnette commented on JCR-388:
-
What's the status of this patch?
add support for RFC 3253 to the simple server
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=comments#action_12416742 ]
angela commented on JCR-388:
regarding your questions:
a) the factory should take care of building the proper resource instances.
thus: version, versionhistory specific object
hi jérémi
since i would like to take advantage of your patch to think about a better
structure and how we can package things ('simple' is probably not an
appropiate package name), i would suggest that to have this solved before we
commit the extensions.
hope that's fine.
Sure. what kind of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-388?page=comments#action_12374168 ]
angela commented on JCR-388:
while reviewing the patch i looked for reason the missing size in the
version-report as well.
i'd say this caused by again the missing handler for
20 matches
Mail list logo
