: Roy T. Fielding
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0
The following files under 1.0 branch refer to incubator in one way or another.
Some of them may be benign.
./contrib/bdb-persistence/project.properties
./contrib/bdb-persistence/project.xml
./contrib/bdb-persistence/README.txt
./contrib
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-372?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-372:
Fix Version: 1.0.1
(was: 1.0)
This is an ongoing work item, but the most significant docs are fixed for 1.0.
Consistently refer to Apache
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-298?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-298:
Component: contrib PMs
missing blob.remove in Berkeley DB persistance manager
--
Key: JCR-298
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-350?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-350:
Component: webdav
WebDAV: add support for RFC 3744
Key: JCR-350
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-368?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-368:
Component: core
Add support for simple test cases
-
Key: JCR-368
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-76?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-76:
---
Component: contrib PMs
Environment:
PersistenceManager sanity check
---
Key: JCR-76
URL: http
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-148?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-148:
Component: contrib PMs
ORM-PMs store data disregarding the workspace
-
Key: JCR-148
URL: http
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-352?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-352:
Component: indexing
(was: query)
Upgrade to Lucene 1.9.1
---
Key: JCR-352
URL: http
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
I just committed a few changes to the Jackrabbit web site. Brief
summary:
1) I replaced the latest javadocs with the javadocs of the 1.0
release. I also disabled the javadoc report from project.xml to keep
the javadocs static. See the recent
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-356?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding reopened JCR-356:
-
The ASF board just changed the license header text (added a sentence).
RESOLVED, that the NOTICE file shall begin with the following
text
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-356?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-356:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.0)
Version: (was: 0.9)
Replace license headers with new policy text
On May 28, 2006, at 4:29 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
does anybody know who is responsible for this mailing? the html is
broken an none of the links work.
The mailing is text-only -- maybe gmail is choking on it.
Roy
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-356?page=all ]
Roy T. Fielding closed JCR-356:
---
Resolution: Fixed
No need to update the old branch.
Replace license headers with new policy text
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-367?page=comments#action_12418726 ]
Roy T. Fielding commented on JCR-367:
-
It is not safe to use code from a JDK, even when that code comes from Apache
originally. Please replace it with the code from Xerces
As part of the website upgrade, someone decided to change the ASF logo.
As you might imagine, making arbitrary changes to the Apache logos are
just as forbidden here as they would be for any other company.
I have reverted the change to project.xml that caused the new logo
to be shown.
On Sep 6, 2006, at 4:14 AM, David Nuescheler wrote:
Personally, I believe that for example a restore facility has to be
buried deep down in the core and therefore the code has to comply
with the high quality requirements that we have for code in the core
and for the seasoned Jackrabbit
On Sep 19, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Edgar Poce wrote:
a few days ago a user uploaded to the wiki a zip file which contains
a jackrabbit installer for jboss. Personally, for lots of reasons, I
think it's a bad idea to distribute binaries through the wiki and I
think the asf has well defined procedures
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-592?page=comments#action_12445587 ]
Roy T. Fielding commented on JCR-592:
-
The Day Spec License is the broadest possible license allowed under the JSPA
(use of this template is enforced by Sun
Why do we need the dojo library in our subversion?
Roy
On Nov 12, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On 11/13/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/12/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we need the dojo library in our subversion?
It's not something we need, it's not a hard task to add dojo manually
to a webapp
Are we going to move the site generation from core to the parent?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] egrep jackrabbit-site jackrabbit-core/*
jackrabbit-core/project.properties:# Site Deploy (into ../jackrabbit-
site for checkout on jackrabbit.apache.org)
jackrabbit-core/project.xml:
On Jan 16, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
I have posted an updated candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.2
release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.2/
See the included RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details on release
contents and latest changes. The JCR-707 fix is the
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Raphael Wegmueller wrote:
the usage of the 3rd version digit as a sort of rc counter sounds
rather confusing to me, too...
how about always suffixing release candidates that are voted on with
-rcN, and after acceptance releasing the same
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Raphael Wegmueller wrote:
so what would happen if you had to release a real patch to
jackrabbit 1.2.1?
would it be versioned 1.2.1.1 then? or 1.2.2?
This is an open source project. Patches are source code diff files
and don't have versions. They just apply to
On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
3. Day files a software grant
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) for the
contributed code.
It is sufficient for Day to send an addendum to the existing grant.
In other words, ask David to send email to Jim Jagielski (and cc
+1
Roy
On Mar 25, 2007, at 1:14 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Removed the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files from the
source tree. These files are located in the project base
directory and automatically included in the jar artifacts
by extra Maven
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On 4/13/07, Marcel Reutegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, I see. there seems to be a fundamental mismatch between the
spi and the ngp
design. The spi clearly decouples the transient changes from the
server whereas
the ngp rather integrates
+1
Roy
On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Randy Gordon wrote:
I started writing a JackRabbit Eclipse plugin, and decided to
include the JSR-170 javadocs.
As I read the license for the JSR-170 specification on http://
www.day.com/maven/jsr170/licenses/day-spec-license.htm.
it seems pretty clear you
On Jun 23, 2007, at 4:17 AM, Randy Gordon wrote:
Mr Fielding,
I apologize for sending this directly to the list, but since I saw
your reply only on reading GMANE on the web and not in my emailed
jackrabbit dev digests, I don't know where else to send it.
My reply to your comments is:
As
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Arje Cahn wrote:
I'm not sure whether this has been discussed on the list already, but
what happens to Jackrabbit when the Apache JCP policy proposal gets
voted in and the ASF will no longer accept a JSR-283 TCK? (or is that
not the case..?)
Day published the JSR
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java version 1.5.0_07
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
If my reasoning is correct, I would treat the issue as a test case bug
to be fixed in a future release, and not a blocker to 1.3.1.
I don't consider it a blocker. I think it may have existed on 1.3.0
as well, since I remember trying to test
I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we
know if
JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license, or has Sun
encumbered
it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
We don't know. We won't implement
On Sep 6, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Arje Cahn wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with those digest emails? Or does this
only happen to me... All Jira messages are suddenly credited to Ard
Schrijvers. I guess he didn't change *all* of the Jira issues
below, did he???!
ezmlm caches the author text
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532265
]
Roy T. Fielding commented on JCR-1161:
--
BTW, the test case is also bogus because it is using a round-trip through
On Apr 20, 2008, at 6:03 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
I have a growing concern about our latest releases. Most of the
time we
barely get the required minimum of 3 +1 votes to release the stuff.
Take
as an example some recent release vote results:
* Jackrabbit 1.3.4 - 3 votes
*
On Apr 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
The important release artifact to check is the source archive, the
binary artifacts are mostly a convenience to users.
The binaries are irrelevant.
OK, I understand, but I don't agree. Most users download the binaries;
very few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roy T. Fielding closed JCR-1628.
Resolution: Invalid
No, the JSR 170 specification is not licensed to the ASF except
under the terms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roy T. Fielding updated JCR-1628:
-
Attachment: (was: jsr-170-html.zip)
Put HTML version of JCR spec on website (for search
On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 25 Feb 2009, at 12:49, Angela Schreiber wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 25 Feb 2009, at 12:16, Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Florent Guillaume
f...@nuxeo.com wrote:
What do you guys think of
It looks like someone at nabble changed their configuration,
since the subscription changed just before that spam. I removed
the junk from our archive and added them to the deny list.
If anyone remembers how nabble's config works, please tell
it to deny posting to our list.
Roy
On Feb 24, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
My personal favorite so far is Jonsai (as in Java + Bonsai) that
Michael D. suggested in a lunch conversation last week.
Any other ideas? I suggest we collect ideas over the next few days,
check how well the measure against the above
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:07 AM, David Nuescheler wrote:
[ ] Blackrabbit
[x] Oak
The oak is a common symbol of strength and endurance ... - wikipedia
Yeah, it's also one of the more commonly used codenames. Java itself was
called Oak before its release. But that's okay as long as we don't
Why MongoDB? It is under an incompatible license, so we'd never be able to
distribute this pm.
Roy
On Mar 10, 2012, at 9:56 AM, ste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan
Date: Sat Mar 10 17:56:34 2012
New Revision: 1299243
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299243view=rev
Log:
it that
MongoDB itself is under a different license.
Roy
On Mar 10, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
The drivers are apache2 if that matters any.
On 03/10/2012 02:38 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Why MongoDB? It is under an incompatible license, so we'd never be able to
distribute this pm
Hi,
It's been a long time since I made any significant contributions to these
projects and
I find myself unable to keep up with the email load. So, I am finally removing
myself
from the lists. I'll still be around, if needed, but please remove me from the
official
PMC memberships.
Cheers, and
rs
> PMC members and vice versa. Before I move forward, could you let me know
> whether you also resign from being a committer? There is no pressure in doing
> so, but I would like to notify the PMC in case we deviate from a long
> standing habit.
>
> Michael
>
>>
49 matches
Mail list logo
