Usually it is just simpler to use the -I flag to add the gem clone's
lib/ext/whatever dirs. If you can build the gem you can install normally.
Between those two options there are ways to get a virtual gem directly on
the clone, but I usually stick to the simpler options above.
- Charlie (mobile)
Generally if you have both instance methods and class methods, you'd
make the class methods static and add meta = true to the JRubyMethod
annotation.
If you define only class methods, meta = true is not necessary if you
defineAnnotatedMethods using the singleton class
As some of you may know, Codehaus is being shut down. As a result,
we'll need to migrate the JRuby lists to another service.
Given that the old lists are going to be nuked from orbit, I think
we're justified in transplanting the entire mailing list to a new
service without making people
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ricky Ng dum...@gmail.com wrote:
How is the Discourse email interface? I recall one of the counter
arguments against Ruby's list moving to Discourse was that the inline
replies didn't translate well to email.
This is definitely a key point. Google Groups is
Unfortunately, jruby.org is down. It appears someone wiped the
instance, and we're working to get it rebuilt.
In light of this, we've decided today's the day we make the Github
repository (https://github.com/jruby/jruby) the canonical repo. Please
update your remotes to push directly to Github.
Hey, what would folks think about installing the BountySource plugin
on github? As I understand it, it does the following:
* Updates new issues to have a banner at the bottom saying bounties are accepted
* Labels such issues when someone has put a bounty on them
* Updates issues and bounties when
When JRuby is accepted as a GSoC organization, you will be able to see us
there with a template. In general, we just want to see a clear path through
the summer, with periodic milestones, schedule, midterm and end goals, and
overall implementation plan.
IR for Dalvik would be a great project. We
It's largely up to you which of the two projects sounds more
interesting, but Chris (already replied) or Subbu (probably will reply
soon) are your contacts for Truffle and IR, respectively. I would say
that from a compiler perspective, IR probably has more work and
subprojects for you to help
A lot more code is working now that I've just opted to back off
specializing anything beyond what the IR does itself. This means that
passing a block to nested closures is done by reifying it into a Proc,
sticking it in the DynamicScope, and unboxing it on the other side...among
other things.
Ok, so I got frame push/pop working and wanted to move on to binding.
I was under the impression that push/pop binding was basically for
pushing/popping a DynamicScope, but it seems like it's more than that.
For the following code: def foo; a = 1; eval 'p a'; end
We get these linearized
, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I've been working on the IR JIT recently, getting more method argument
forms working and reducing the manual specialization I do
I've been working on the IR JIT recently, getting more method argument
forms working and reducing the manual specialization I do in the
compiler. More code is working because of that, but it increases the
need for us to get to a baseline from which we can start specializing
and improving the IR.
This looks like our win32 implementation of resolv.rb logic, which
uses FFI to call down to actual win32 functions, is not loading
properly.
Please file an issue for this.
- Charlie
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Félix Bellanger
felix.bellan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
So I'm trying to run a
Many questions!
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jon Zeppieri zeppi...@gmail.com wrote:
- Are NotCompilableExceptions caught somewhere, allowing the
interpreter to carry on? (I did a simple grep for this, but didn't
find it.) Or was that code path not taken, at all?
NotCompileableException is
krypt should become a default gem for both 1.8 and 1.9 modes. I just
haven't done it yet. Ideally all gems that are vendored by us should
be listed as default gems. If it's possible, getting them as maven
dependencies would be even better.
christian: I'm not sure if there's a better way for us to
Thanks for the update and links, Alberto! I tweeted it on my personal
account and will retweet on the JRuby account. Looks like great work
going on!
- Charlie
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Alberto Arrigoni arrig...@ingm.org wrote:
Hello everybody!
I wish to inform you about a Sciruby
Here's an updated list of benchmarks I would find useful to compare
JRuby embedded perf.
It would also be *really* nice to get perf on these benchmarks under
Ruby 2.0.0 as a baseline, so there's something to compare with.
Benchmarks for JRuby on ARM
in rubybench/time/
bench_fib_recursive.rb
Today I landed a very large set of commits that port a subset of MRI's
IO+encoding logic. The goal is to get all IO-related
encoding/transcoding behavior working, plus logic that depends on IO
encoding/transcoding.
All tests are passing, after a couple weeks work. Not everything from
MRI has been
I've been reviewing encoding-related issues in prep for 1.7.5.
Encoding is one of the things we wanted to have done for 1.7.5, so
we could safely fork 9k without any major merged happening.
Many issues have been fixed since 1.7.4, so the list has gotten rather
small. Here's what I found that I
Additional issue: JIT failure for some people
(https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues/802#issuecomment-21462656)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I've been reviewing encoding-related issues in prep for 1.7.5.
Encoding is one of the things we
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Robert Lougher rob.loug...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick FYI. JamVM is definitely not dead! I'm still actively
developing/maintaining it (I'm the sole developer, and have been for over 10
years - Pekka Enberg forked JamVM at one point but abandoned it and moved
File an issue for this please. I think we could make Java arrays
trivially serializable by giving them named classes rather than
anonymous classes.
A possible workaround might be this:
$ jirb
irb(main):001:0 bytes = 'foo'.to_java_bytes
= byte[102, 111, 111]@c5a311d
irb(main):002:0 bytes.class
=
Ok, so I think we should defer on the object allocation ones for now
and focus on a few that are coarse-grained and general purpose.
Thoughts below.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Chamila Wijayarathna
cdwijayarat...@gmail.com wrote:
· 1. Object-create -: fired when an object is about
Update...
org.jruby release management has been moved to Sonatype! I confirmed
yesterday that snapshots are working (tested with yydebug) and today
we should have central repo mirroring enabled.
yydebug has been moved to jruby/jay-yydebug to make the release
process smoother, and I have released
that happens I'll have it in maven within a day.
So as far as unpushed artifacts, that mostly leaves stuff under
org.jruby. If I can get push rights for new artifacts there, we can
take care of the last few items.
- Charlie
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote
I am very interested in speeding up the build for a single change. Right
now, edit any source file and mvn takes almost 50s on my system. With the
incremental compile that dropped to 29s.
A good portion is also the double shading. Perhaps we can do both in
parallel or defer one to a dist profile.
Benoit has worked with us in two GSoC (2012 and 2013) and has been
working this year on native versions of pathname and date (as were
introduced for MRI in 1.9.3). He'll be continuing that GSoC work,
helping with 1.9 and 2.0 compatibility, and in general helping to
maintain JRuby going forward.
Master appears to be broken due to the move of joda-time out of normal
dependencies. I'm going to move it back so we have a working build
again.
- Charlie
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Christian Meier
meier.krist...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I had the same thought to get joda-timezone out of the
, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Master appears to be broken due to the move of joda-time out of normal
dependencies. I'm going to move it back so we have a working build
again.
- Charlie
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Christian Meier
meier.krist...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:13 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
add
includeRubygemsInTestResourcesfalse/includeRubygemsInTestResources
in config.
Ok.
btw would like to revert your adding back the joda-time deps since came
where travis did not fail on joda-time anymore. and it will break
Travis is now running green :-) Victory!
- Charlie
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:13 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
add
(utilities for preparing releases, updating stdlib, etc
At some point I'll review these threads to make sure we have not
missed anything else.
- Charlie
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Updates... we're nearly there, I think :-)
We have continue
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
currently you can do
$ mvn -Dtzdata.version=2013c -Ptzdata
but the 2013c artifact does exists and must exists before.
one why to make it more convenient is to hardcode the 2013c in to
core/pom.xml for -Ptzdata case that means
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
* The clean phase for the test module wipes out all gems installed
in jruby.home (lib/ruby/gems/shared). We should probably only be
wiping out
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I think we should set up a project and start pushing artifacts to
central that contain the tzdata. Then we only have to create the
artifacts for different tzdata versions once, and use the -D flag
after
Updates... we're nearly there, I think :-)
We have continue reorganizing the repository into maven modules, which
makes it possible to isolate subsystems more easily. This work is
being done on the branch stripped_project.
The branch has the following:
* build_lib is gone (yay!). Resulting src
Update! And good news!
The following items are now working properly:
* CI green (usually, as before) and running the same sets of tests as before
* Simplified bootstrapping (more on that below)
I have commited BUILDING.md which describes how to get up and going. I
have preferred to recommend
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Wayne Meissner wmeiss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2013 16:31, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
* cext handling?
Kill it! Kill it with fire!
As much as I don't like breaking backward compatibility in a minor
point release, cext is pretty
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:35 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
it is based on the pom.xml from two days ago - so the test part is not
working as on master.
the main difference is the the java sources and tests went into the
jruby-core directory (jruby-core/src/main/java, jruby-core/test).
, but still
work for test goal (i.e. hardcoding skipTests is NOT a solution)?
It's a serious impediment to have to run tests every time we package
up a new jar locally.
- Charlie
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Done:
* From old jar building: install spi
Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
Done:
* From old jar building: install spi services stuff under meta-inf
* From old test runs: compile test files. I'm hoping these can be run
as part of the maven build and we won't actually need to add them to
the rake test runs (i.e. these can be our
the two changesets.
- Charlie
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:34 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
* building openssl and readline into their own jars (in stdlib), as in
ant build. They're done this way so we can
Grr...github is down for maintenance. I will look at this when they're back up.
- Charlie
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Ahh I think we we working on this at the same time.
My approach was to move openssl and readline into their own maven
fixed the require lines.
- Charlie
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Grr...github is down for maintenance. I will look at this when they're back
up.
- Charlie
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote
For now you can pull later jnr-posix and 'mvn install' to get he snapshot.
Shouldn't the snapshot build be available in Sonatype?
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 9:16 AM, Hirotsugu Asari asari.r...@gmail.com wrote:
For me
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project jruby: Could
Later = latest
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 10:13 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
For now you can pull later jnr-posix and 'mvn install' to get he snapshot.
Shouldn't the snapshot build be available in Sonatype?
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 9:16 AM
Looks like the artifact is there...are you sure you're on master head?
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 10:16 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
Later = latest
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 10:13 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
For now you can
Yeah head should have the snapshot repo in pom now.
- Charlie (mobile)
On Jun 29, 2013 10:31 AM, Wayne Meissner wmeiss...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2013 00:13, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
For now you can pull later jnr-posix and 'mvn install' to get he
snapshot
Tom and I have agreed to add christian as a JRuby committer, for help
with maven in the past and help with the current reorganization.
Welcome to the team (officially)!
- Charlie
-
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:03 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
maybe a mixture of of both is possible too:
.
├── jruby-complete
│ └── pom.xml
├── jruby-core
│ └── pom.xml
├── jruby-dev
│ └── pom.xml
├── jruby-stdlib
│ └── pom.xml
├── ext/openssl
│ ├── pom.xml
│ └──
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Douglas Campos q...@qmx.me wrote:
I think the less we deviate from the defaults the less we'll have
cursing and angry Tom hatin' maven ;)
Yeah I'm all for defaults as much as possible to keep the maven files simple.
- Charlie
The maven build is now installed and we're iterating on fixing and
improving it, so I thought I'd start a new thread.
Recent updates:
* sonatype snapshot repo added to pom, and appears to be working for
jnr-posix 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT
* openssl and readline (built as separate jars) moved to their own
Tom: Maybe you can do some verification that mvn package ; ant dist
produces the right artifacts?
I think our best path forward would be to switch over to mvn as soon
as possible and slowly start dropping ant stuff as we confirm it's
working. But getting it in place and using it day today sooner
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote:
Charlie and I just talked about this and Charlie will merge this work onto
master and we will debug and fix from there.
This is done! I made one additional change to use the shade plugin to
produce lib/jruby.jar directly
Oh and it looks like our next goal might be getting snapshot repo set
up, since travis can't find jnr-posix 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT to build. It will
be red until we can get a snapshot repo set up.
- Charlie
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Ok, updates
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:00 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
one more question: the InvokerGenerator acts on the class files and there
are no new sources to compile after the invokation of the InvokerGenerator.
is that right ?
That is correct.
there are some naming issues:
Nearly there! I ran into an issue right away though:
ext-jruby-local ~/projects/jruby $ ruby -v
invalid version selected in build (@jruby.default.ruby.version@), using 1.8
jruby 1.7.5.dev (ruby-1.8.7p370) 2013-06-27 @jruby.revision@ on Java
HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.7.0_11-b21
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:39 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
Seems like Constants.java isn't getting populated right.
hmm - I will have a look at that right away tomorrow especially since I get
$ bin/jruby -v
jruby 1.7.5.dev (1.9.3p392) 2013-06-27 0573635 on OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
37: putstatic #12 // Field RUBY2_0_REVISION:I
40: ldc #13 // String @jruby.revision@
42: putstatic #14 // Field
REVISION:Ljava
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I have a patch that should fix it, but that behavior confuses me.
I've pushed pom-ng plus my fix to github/jruby/jruby pom-ng branch
(modifed only Constants.java).
I'm going to run some rounds of tests to see how
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I'm going to run some rounds of tests to see how it looks.
Good news! MRI and RubySpec both look good in 1.9 mode. I have not run
all other tests, but these are my 99% cases. Passing them means we're
looking pretty
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
* *INVOKER.class files that act as method handles (these will probably
go away once we're Java 7+ only)
Android?
Yeah, good point. We
Great progress, kristian...I'm poking at it a bit right now!
I agree with the XML getting rather ugly, especially when we have a
lot of custom build steps. The only problems I see with using
ruby-maven are obviously bootstrapping-related (have to install it,
including jruby, to use it to build
Ahh well *generating* the pom.xml from the ruby-maven sounds like a
great solution! That would certainly be less work to maintain over
time, and those of us maintaining it will have ruby-maven available
anyway.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to rework AnnotationBinder
and the invoker
Ok folks...the branching off of 1.7 is coming very soon, and I think
one of the biggest ticket items we need to do before then is reorg the
codebase like we want to see it in the future. Failing to do this
before branching will massively complicated merging changes back.
I have a few proposals.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Marcotte dmarco...@gmail.com wrote:
Any thoughts on migrating to Gradle rather than Maven? This should give
better tools for capturing the complexity of the existing ant build while
still having all the benefits you're after from Maven.
Gradle is a
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:37 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
* Mavenizing.
hey - I am more than happy to help with that task if help is needed ;)
We welcome any help :-) I think we really want to do this in master
*before* branching, since it will mean structural changes that
complicate
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Yoko Harada yoko...@gmail.com wrote:
When JRuby will be mavenized, is it possible to divide into sub modules?
and, for some users, make it customizable?
For example, Ruboto cuts down unnecessary packages from JRuby and make it
small to fit in the devices.
As
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
* Remove C ext support to an external repository and gem
I have pushed a no_cext branch that removes all direct references to C
ext stuff from src, build/test, dist, and so on. Everything looks
clean (and it feels
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
A quick list, scanning build_lib...
Already being published to Maven for releases (but not snapshots):
bytelist
invokebinder
jcodings
jffi
jnr-constants
jnr-enxio
jnr-ffi
jnr-netdb
jnr-posix
jnr-unixsocket
jnr-x86asm
.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
For example, pure Java Nokogiri will have some good effects from this?
Can you elaborate? Are you referring to the problem of bundling
Nokogiri with a complete style jar, as on Ruboto?
Sure.
You mentioned about
As you know, we've been moving toward using Github Issues more and
more. One of the gaps in their feature set is inability to set
alternative resolutions for bugs... they're either Open or Closed,
so you can't tell if they were closed because they're fixed,
duplicate, invalid, or what.
Tom and I
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Thomas E Enebo tom.en...@gmail.com wrote:
JRuby 1.7.4 is our fourth update release since JRuby 1.7.0. The primary
goal of 1.7 point releases is to fill out any missing compatibility issues
with Ruby 1.9.4. The community participation lately has been great. Keep
Welcome Alex to the team. He has been tossing us pull requests for a good
while now, cleaning up edge case specs and helping us round out Ruby 1.9.3
behavior.
Thank you Alex!
- Charlie
I am updating the 1.9.3 tests and as you'd expect, there's some new
failures. These may be good targets for anyone that wants to
contribute.
The gist of all failure output is here: https://gist.github.com/headius/5043817
I'm going to be adding excludes for all these for now (under
I have incorporated Martin Bosslet's krypt library into JRuby master
and used his OpenSSL PKCS5 shim to provide PKCS5:
https://github.com/jruby/jruby/commit/cc9acbaf2
Those of you interested in either krypt or pkcs5 might want to play
with master and let us know if we're on the right track :-)
failures...
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by the old openssl gem. If you run rake
test:mri19 in the JRuby repo it will run the 1.9 version of the
OpenSSL tests with known failures excluded.
- Charlie
On Wed, Jan
working great at
least for my uses. There are still remaining things to be done, but they are
enhancements.
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ok, I'm pulling in the BC updates based on Matt Hauck's branch. I'll
pull to a bc147 branch
.
- Charlie
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
Ok cool, don't bother with the PR then...I'm in the middle of this and
will push to master soon.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Matt Hauck mattha...@gmail.com wrote:
Great. I was just about to issue
!
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ok, all BC 1.47 changes have been pushed to master! I had some
failures, but they didn't seem to correspond to OpenSSL (except for
two in rake test:mri19 I'm looking at now).
We're not green on any CI so I
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
You can see these failures running `rake test:mri19` or by running
them directly (though you need to run with minitest excludes to mask
expected failures).
Using -n works too.
system ~/projects/jruby $ jruby
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Matt Hauck mattha...@gmail.com wrote:
The first one fails probably because when it changes the version, it expects
that the outputted der would have been different, and thus does not match
the signature anymore.
That sounds good to me :-) Perhaps you can figure
for PKCS10 though. I argue we should make the
code that calls version= not break, but i think it will be a losing battle
going forward trying to support it.
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Matt Hauck mattha
I filed https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues/509 and excluded the
failing tests for now.
- Charlie
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
This seems pretty reasonable to me. I don't like losing the MRI tests,
so there may be some tweaking we could do
Hauck mattha...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I had actually modified the tests to exclude the parts of the test
the try changing the version.
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
This seems pretty reasonable to me. I don't like losing the MRI
Excellent, Lars! I'll take a look at it and probably roll it into
master if it runs green. It will be *very* nice to be current on
Bouncy Castle.
- Charlie
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Lars Westergren
lars.westerg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm far from an expert on security, so if anyone is, a
.
How do you run the openssl tests only from the jruby repo?
--
Matt Hauck
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Excellent, Lars! I'll take a look at it and probably roll it into
master if it runs green. It will be *very* nice to be current on
Bouncy Castle
I've been working on an overhaul of our test suites and targets. This
email serves to update JRuby devs on the lay of the land.
All .rb-based test suites have been moved out of the ant build into
rake. The ant targets you're familiar with will still end up invoking
them, but I'd like to encourage
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter (JIRA) j...@codehaus.org
wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter commented on JRUBY-6951
Unable to encrypt data and then decrypt it in MRI Ruby
It looks like it's an iv issue. After reading
http://stackoverflow.com
I had to force push github/master a bit ago; it appeared to have
gotten out of sync with the jruby.org repository. I did make sure to
merge github/master into jruby.org/master first, but if you have made
commits recently please confirm that have not been lost.
Thank you!
- Charlie
In the interest of making it easier for us to add specs to RubySpec,
I've made the following changes:
* The spec/mspec and spec/ruby git submodules are no more. After
updating JRuby master, you may have to scrub your .git/config to get
rid of the submodule entries. Here's an SO post that
No argument here...for better or worse, JRockit is no more.
- Charlie
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Hirotsugu Asari asari.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen a few cases where JRockIt hangs during the jruby-test-matrix CI
job. Rather than manually terminating it every time, I opted to
Reporter:
Charles Oliver Nutter
This message is a
The post17 branch has been merged to master and deleted. I chose to
rebase to master first, so all post17 commits are piled on top of
master as recent commits.
Thanks for your patience!
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
We're going to finally
We're going to finally release JRuby 1.7.0 either today or Monday,
barring any serious last-minute issues.
Committers: Please push to post17 branch until the release is out.
Everything on this branch will merge to master after the release and
become part of 1.7.1.
That is all.
- Charlie
Great news! Thank you!
- Charlie (mobile)
On Oct 19, 2012 1:49 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just to let you know, we're running JRuby 1.7 under production since RC1
(it is now on RC2). No problems so far.
Em 19-10-2012 14:55, Charles Oliver Nutter escreveu:
We're
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:54 AM, kristian m.krist...@web.de wrote:
JRUBY uses
org.bouncycastle:bcmail-jdk15on:jar:1.46
org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on:jar:1.46
for testing you can just prepend them to your bootclassloader - something like
jruby
Yeah sorry for the troubles here. Hopefully for JRuby 1.7.1 we can get
our SSL stuff updated to current BC..
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Carl Bourne carl.bou...@me.com wrote:
Well to sort of answer my own question here, this works in JRuby 1.7 RC2 but
not in 1.6.8.
There should also be an initialize__method you can call for the same
effect. Any methods we don't directly map (usually due to naming
conflict) we will add a __method alias for.
- Charlie
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Lars Westergren
lars.westerg...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you hit this
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Carl Bourne carl.bou...@me.com wrote:
So when I tried:
kp.java_send :initialize, 2048
I got the following error:-
TypeError: can't convert Fixnum into Array
java_send takes the following params:
* name of the target Java method
* an array of Java types for
1 - 100 of 1394 matches
Mail list logo
