Hi JRuby development team!
Great to meet you all in RailsConf! Thanks for a great presentation+talk!
After returning home, I immediately tested the new RC2 and found that it would
not work with the latest version of ActiveScaffold (1.01). I have made a
comment on "http://jira.codehaus.org/brows
Warning: This is my personal opinion so be prepared to possibly disagree :-)
As a consultant I do work ranging from Microsoft .NET, Java to Ruby/Rails so I
get lots of impressions of what is good/bad in all worlds.
One of the (few :-)) great things of the Microsoft platform is how integrated
an
Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
Hi Morten,
You know I don't wholeheartedly agree with this approach. On the other
hand, it would make sense to package a downloadable JRuby on
Rails-package, which a customized war.rb for Derby use, and things like
that.
Hi Ola,
Yea, I remember that you don'
Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:I think we should follow
Linux's model here, not Microsoft's. For JRuby,
that means keeping the core lean and compact, not adding in every new
feature that comes along. This has caused some other language impls like
Groovy to now require tens of m
Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:I don't think this is valid at all. It's
looking at it in a very
un-Open-Source way to say that the extras should be supported by JRuby.
I think it should be the other way around.
Once again, official is really not the question when talking Open Source
Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: M C wrote:
> Anyway, this is just my opinion of what would benefit JRuby and its
> users. I am not going to run screaming for the hills if I can't persuade
> you guys :-) ... And no, I don't think making my own
I noticed that Rails 2.0RC2 was released today and I would volunteer to report
on how it works with JRuby. However as JRuby 1.1 is still a work in process I
really need a semi-stable beta or something similar to test Rails 2.0 on JRuby
(without spending all my time running into unstable build is
Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:So many options, so little
documentation!
Yes, if you AOT compile, you avoid the JIT cost of one Java class being
generated per method. However the methods generated into that class
still need to be bound into DynamicMethod objects somehow, so w
First of all congrats to the development team for releasing jruby 1.1! Impressive work!!I took a brief look at it yesterday and from a user perspective I have a a few initial suggestions for 1.1.x in addition to the areas of Java Integration and performance that you mention (which I think you are r
ev@jruby.codehaus.org
> Dato: søndag 6. april 2008 23.50
> At 8:47 AM + 4/6/08, M C wrote:
> >4) Please re-consider the naming of rake, spec, gem and
> ri tasks in the bin directory. I would like to co-exist with
> a normal ruby installation so the first thing I normally do
>
--- Den man 7/4/08 skrev Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FYI, we're chasing this down on the RubyGems side and
> we'll get them to
> change it back to just "gem". JRuby shouldn't
> be the only impl forced to
> have a differently-named 'gem' script.
Seems like RubyGems are already do
Just read the interesting article below about javascript performance increases
due to a new tracing optimization. Sounds similar to what JRuby is doing to me
but according to the article it is something new.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080822-firefox-to-get-massive-javascript-perform
My wishlist:
* Complete Gems-in-a-jar with java support (JRUBY-3299)
* Support for doing Java annotations from JRuby (for JUnit4+ tests etc.)
* OSGI support
/Morten
--- Den lør 28/2/09 skrev Charles Oliver Nutter :
Fra: Charles Oliver Nutter
Emne: [jruby-dev] Setting priorities for 1.3
Til: dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
