Hi Justine/All,
I want to wrap up this voting process in the next day or so. Justine, since you
gave a conditional binding vote regarding updating the error message, I want to
circle back and verify that you're happy with the current state of the changes
before concluding the voting process
+1 (non-binding) from me as well! This is the type of problem which is
difficult to become aware of so the more guardrails we put into place the
better.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 23:30, Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Thank you, Justin. That makes sense.
> I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of
angeRecord and BrokerRegistrationRequest
to a boolean
- Describe this behavior in the Controller in Broker
It’s been a lot of work to get here and I’m similarly excited to get
this released soon! The vote has been open over the last week
and I'm happy to give it another two to get any other thoughts witho
Thank you, Justin. That makes sense.
I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of ahead/behind. Instead, we will
use the existing error message that utilizes the acceptable range for the
timestamps.
Thanks,
Mehari
Hey Mehari,
Thanks for the KIP. One minor change is now that we have the before and
after configs does this error make sense?
> we will return error code 32 (INVALID_TIMESTAMP) with the error message
"Timestamp of the message with offset [record offset] is ahead of the
broker's current time."
I
Hi all,
Thanks all for voting!
Currently we have +3 binding (from Divij Vaidya, Luke Chen and ziming deng)
and +2 non-binding(from Kirk True and Kamal Chandraprakash).
This vote thread has been open over 72 hours and has sufficient votes, so
I’ll close the voting at this time.
KIP-872 has
Hi John,
Thank you for your reminder!
Best,
ShunKang
John Roesler 于2023年6月20日 周二22:11写道：
> Hi Divij and ShunKang,
>
> I pulled open this thread to see if you needed my vote, but FYI, Divij is
> a committer now, so he can re-cast his vote as binding.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
&g
+1 (again) - binding :)
Please update the PR ShunKang and tag me for review when you are ready.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 4:11 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Hi Divij and ShunKang,
>
> I pulled open this thread to see if you needed my vote, but FYI, Divij is
> a committe
Hi Divij and ShunKang,
I pulled open this thread to see if you needed my vote, but FYI, Divij is a
committer now, so he can re-cast his vote as binding.
Thanks,
-John
On 2023/06/20 13:37:04 ShunKang Lin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Bump this thread again and see if we could get a few m
,
ShunKang
ShunKang Lin 于2023年5月7日周日 15:24写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-872, which proposes to add
> Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying.
>
> The proposal is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Andrew
> On 19 Jun 2023, at 11:42, Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> This KIP solves a real operational pain point for the administrator of
> Kafka cluster.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 5:09 AM Kirk True wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
Hi Ivan,
Thanks and congrats for your first accepted KIP.
Regarding the process, yes you are right. You should create an issue (this
can be done pre-KIP as well), it would be good if you could link this vote
thread in the JIRA. Then you need to update your KIP's wiki page with the
status
; >
> > > Thank you for your votes.
> > >
> > > Based on the proposal of Satish in the discussion thread, I modified
> the
> > > KIP a little bit by lowering the default value of
> > > `remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata.max.size` from 10
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Mehari!
> On Jun 16, 2023, at 6:29 PM, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:55 PM Beyene, Mehari
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am opening the Volte on KIP-937 here. If we have more to discuss, please
+1 (binding) from me.
Thanks.
Luke
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:55 PM Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am opening the Volte on KIP-937 here. If we have more to discuss, please
> continue the discussion on the existing thread at:
>
Hello everyone,
I am opening the Volte on KIP-937 here. If we have more to discuss, please
continue the discussion on the existing thread at:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wdpw845q9f5rhf6tz9tdlx3kc1g5zczc
Thank you,
Mehari
Hi Igor,
Thanks for all your work on this! You've really done a lot to push it over the
finish line. It will be awesome to see this coming to a 3.x release soon.
I did a preliminary pass today. Can I please ask that you give us two weeks
before you close the vote, since it's such a big change
; >
> > Based on the proposal of Satish in the discussion thread, I modified the
> > KIP a little bit by lowering the default value of
> > `remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata.max.size` from 10 KiB to 128 bytes. I
> > hope this doesn't change your vote, but feel
17:32:35 UTC-4:00To:
> dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-864: Add End-To-End Latency Metrics to Connectors
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Bumping this vote thread. 2 +1 binding and 1 +1 non-binding so far.
>
> Cheers,
> Jorge.
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 18:56, Kno
the default value of
> `remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata.max.size` from 10 KiB to 128 bytes. I
> hope this doesn't change your vote, but feel free to raise your concerns.
> Thank you!
>
> Best,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 11:09, Josep Prat
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> >
Hi all!
Thank you for your votes.
Based on the proposal of Satish in the discussion thread, I modified the
KIP a little bit by lowering the default value of
`remote.log.metadata.custom.metadata.max.size` from 10 KiB to 128 bytes. I
hope this doesn't change your vote, but feel free to raise your
Hi,
I'm now closing the vote. The vote passes with
- 4 +1 bindings votes from Luke, John, Bill and David
- 4 +1 non-binding votes from Federico, Jakub, Josep and Satish
- 0 -1 votes
I'll go ahead and finish the release process.
Thanks,
Mickael
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:05 PM David Arthur
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
> > > > implement.
> > > >
> > > > Vote +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Divij Vaidya
&g
n-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 21:23 Divij Vaidya wrote:
> >
> > > I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
> > > implement.
> > >
> > > Vote +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > &
It's been a while since there was new feedback on KIP-858 [1]
> which aims to address this gap, so I'm calling for a vote.
>
> A huge thank you to everyone who has reviewed this KIP, and
> participated in the discussion thread! [2]
>
> I'd also like to thank you in adva
t it would be beneficial to
> > implement.
> >
> > Vote +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Divij Vaidya
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 4:39 PM Ivan Yurchenko >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 21:23 Divij Vaidya wrote:
> I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
> implement.
>
> Vote +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 202
Hi all,
The vote passed with 3 binding votes and 1 non-binding vote. Thanks all for
voting!
Thanks,
Hao
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 4:29 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks, Hao!
>
> I'm +1 (binding)
> -John
>
> On 2023/06/05 18:07:56 Walker Carlson wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
>
t; Bill
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 5:38 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've passed the deadline but we are still missing votes.
> > So far we have have 2 binding votes (Luke and John) and 2 non-binding
> > votes (Federico and Jakub).
> Please take time to test this release candidate and vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Mickael
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:26 PM John Roesler wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for running this release, Mickael!
> >
> > I've verified:
> > * the signature
> > * that I can
I have reviewed the proposal and feel that it would be beneficial to
implement.
Vote +1 (non-binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 4:39 PM Ivan Yurchenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some interest in KIP-917 was expressed in the discussion thread [1]. After
> addressing all
Hello,
Some interest in KIP-917 was expressed in the discussion thread [1]. After
addressing all the comments there, I'm putting it up to a vote.
Thanks!
Best,
Ivan
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qpccqd3jy5rzvbt5ngtzo3dg9pzp722y
Hi everyone,
We're getting closer to dropping ZooKeeper support, and JBOD
in KRaft mode is one of the outstanding big missing features.
It's been a while since there was new feedback on KIP-858 [1]
which aims to address this gap, so I'm calling for a vote.
A huge thank you to everyone who has
:31, Josep Prat wrote:
>
> Hi MIckael,
> Just for the record, I +1'd this release. However, my vote falls onto the
> non-binding ones as well.
>
> Best,
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:38 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've passed the
Hi MIckael,
Just for the record, I +1'd this release. However, my vote falls onto the
non-binding ones as well.
Best,
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:38 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've passed the deadline but we are still missing votes.
> So far we have have 2 binding votes (L
for 3.6.0.
Best,
ShunKang
ShunKang Lin 于2023年5月7日周日 15:24写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-872, which proposes to add
> Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying.
>
> The proposal is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/v
Hi,
We've passed the deadline but we are still missing votes.
So far we have have 2 binding votes (Luke and John) and 2 non-binding
votes (Federico and Jakub).
Please take time to test this release candidate and vote.
Thanks,
Mickael
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:26 PM John Roesler wrote
Hi all,
Thanks for the votes and discussion. I'm going to close the vote.
With a binding +1 from David Arthur, Ron Dagostino, and Luke Chen, and
non-binding +1s from Divij Vaidya and Igor Soarez, the vote passes.
regards,
Colin
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, at 20:17, David Arthur wrote:
> Ok, tha
Ok, thanks for the explanations. +1 binding from me
-David
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:08 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> One note. I added ForwardingManager queue metrics. This should be the last
> addition!
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, at 14:47, Colin McCabe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 8,
One note. I added ForwardingManager queue metrics. This should be the last
addition!
best,
Colin
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, at 14:47, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, at 10:00, David Arthur wrote:
>> Colin, thanks for the KIP! These all seem like pretty useful additions. A
>> few quick
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, at 10:00, David Arthur wrote:
> Colin, thanks for the KIP! These all seem like pretty useful additions. A
> few quick questions
>
> 1) Will the value of TimedOutBrokerHeartbeatCount be zero for inactive
> controllers?
No. It will just stay at whatever it was when the
Colin, thanks for the KIP! These all seem like pretty useful additions. A
few quick questions
1) Will the value of TimedOutBrokerHeartbeatCount be zero for inactive
controllers? Will the value reset to zero after an election, or only
process restart?
2) Does HandleLoadSnapshotCount include the
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the response.
I have no more comments.
+1 (binding)
Luke
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:02 AM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> Thanks for the review and the suggestion.
>
> I think we will add more "handling time" metrics later, but for now I don't
> want to make this KIP
Hi Luke,
Thanks for the review and the suggestion.
I think we will add more "handling time" metrics later, but for now I don't
want to make this KIP any bigger than it is already...
best,
Colin
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, at 03:12, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> One comment:
> Should we add a
edicated MirrorMaker
>> > > 2.0 clusters
>> > > - KIP-881: Rack-aware Partition Assignment for Kafka Consumers
>> > > - KIP-887: Add ConfigProvider to make use of environment variables
>> > > - KIP-889: Versioned State Stores
>> > > - KIP-894:
topic configurations
> > > - KIP-900: KRaft kafka-storage.sh API additions to support SCRAM for
> > > Kafka Brokers
> > >
> > > Release notes for the 3.5.0 release:
> > > https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.5.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > >
"Yes, I am referring to the feature level. I changed the description of
CurrentMetadataVersion to reference the feature level specifically."
Thanks Colin. I have reviewed the KIP after the latest changes (including
addition of two new metrics). It looks good to me.
+1 (non-binding)
--
Divij
te Stores
> > - KIP-894: Use incrementalAlterConfig for syncing topic configurations
> > - KIP-900: KRaft kafka-storage.sh API additions to support SCRAM for
> > Kafka Brokers
> >
> > Release notes for the 3.5.0 release:
> > https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.
Hi Colin,
One comment:
Should we add a metric to record the snapshot handling time?
Since we know the snapshot loading might take long if the size is huge.
We might want to know how much time it is processed. WDYT?
No matter you think we need it or not, the KIP LGTM.
+1 from me.
Thank you.
Hi all,
I added two new metrics to the list:
* LatestSnapshotGeneratedBytes
* LatestSnapshotGeneratedAgeMs
These will help monitor the period snapshot generation process.
best,
Colin
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 22:21, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> Yes, I am referring to the feature level.
Hi Divij,
Yes, I am referring to the feature level. I changed the description of
CurrentMetadataVersion to reference the feature level specifically.
best,
Colin
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 05:56, Divij Vaidya wrote:
> "Each metadata version has a corresponding integer in the
>
https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.5.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Friday June 9, 5pm PT
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (s
: Versioned State Stores
> > > - KIP-894: Use incrementalAlterConfig for syncing topic configurations
> > > - KIP-900: KRaft kafka-storage.sh API additions to support SCRAM for
> > > Kafka Brokers
> > >
> > > Release notes for the 3.5.0 release:
> > > https:
Hi all,
This vote thread has been open over 72 hours, and has sufficient votes so
I'll close the voting at this time.
+4 binding votes
+2 non-binding votes
KIP-923 has PASSED.
Thanks all for your votes
Walker
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 8:13 AM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Wal
hanges anything in this vote thread.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Victoria
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:23 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
>> Hi Walker,
>>
>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>
>> I've caught up on the discussion thread and I'm satisfied wit
"Each metadata version has a corresponding integer in the
MetadataVersion.java file."
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but are you referring to "featureLevel" in
the enum at
Thanks again for the KIP, Colin. +1 (binding).
Ron
> On Jun 6, 2023, at 7:02 AM, Igor Soarez wrote:
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> Seems straightforward, LGTM.
> Non binding +1.
>
> --
> Igor
>
Thanks for the KIP.
Seems straightforward, LGTM.
Non binding +1.
--
Igor
gt;
> https://pidatacenters.com/news/indias-best-multi-tenant-data-center-service-provider-dcd/
> > > >
> > > <https://www.greatplacetowork.in/great/rated/50-great/Pi-DATA/>
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/6437312/>
> > > <https://www.f
atplacetowork.in/great/rated/50-great/Pi-DATA/>
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/6437312/>
> > <https://www.facebook.com/pidatacenters/>
> > <https://twitter.com/pi_datacenters> <https://pidatacenters.com/>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Ju
n, Jun 5, 2023 at 1:47 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the vote.
> I've re-run the 3.4 jenkins build, and the
> `DynamicBrokerReconfigurationTest.testAdvertisedListenerUpdate` test still
> pass.
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.4/142/
&
yncing topic configurations
> > - KIP-900: KRaft kafka-storage.sh API additions to support SCRAM for
> > Kafka Brokers
> >
> > Release notes for the 3.5.0 release:
> > https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.5.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > *** Please downl
On 30.05.23 21:16, Colt McNealy wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thank you Hao!
> > >
> > > Colt McNealy
> > >
> > > *Founder, LittleHorse.dev*
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Hao Li wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to open the vote for KIP-938: Add more metrics for measuring KRaft
performance.
Take a look here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/gBU0Dw
Thanks to everyone who reviewed the proposal.
best,
Colin
t; - KIP-894: Use incrementalAlterConfig for syncing topic configurations
> - KIP-900: KRaft kafka-storage.sh API additions to support SCRAM for
> Kafka Brokers
>
> Release notes for the 3.5.0 release:
> https://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.5.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> *** Please
Hi Walker,
Thanks for the KIP! Left a clarification question on the discussion thread
just now but it's about an implementation detail, so I don't think it
changes anything in this vote thread.
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Victoria
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:23 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Hi Wal
Founder, LittleHorse.dev*
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Hao Li wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-925: rack aware task assignment in
> Kafka
> >> Streams. The link fo
> On 24.05.23 23:00, Walker Carlson wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I'm opening the vote on KIP-923 here
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/lAs0Dw>.
> >
> > If we have more to discus please continue the discussion on the existing
> > thread
Hi Walker,
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Lucas
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 4:20 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
>
> Hi Walker,
>
> Thank you for the KIP!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On 24.05.23 23:00, Walker Carlson wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> &
Hi Walker,
Thank you for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 24.05.23 23:00, Walker Carlson wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm opening the vote on KIP-923 here
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/lAs0Dw>.
If we have more to discus please continue the discussion on the existing
thread
://home.apache.org/~mimaison/kafka-3.5.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
*** Please download, test and vote by Friday June 9, 5pm PT
Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
* Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
https
ers> <https://pidatacenters.com/>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 1:47 PM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Thanks for the vote.
> > I've re-run the 3.4 jenkins build, and the
> > `DynamicBrokerReconfigurationTest.testAdvertisedListenerUpdate` te
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the vote.
I've re-run the 3.4 jenkins build, and the
`DynamicBrokerReconfigurationTest.testAdvertisedListenerUpdate` test still
pass.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.4/142/
And now, I've got:
Binding +1 PMC votes:
* Chris Egerton
* Mickael Maison
* Tom
Hi Hao,
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Bruno
On 30.05.23 21:16, Colt McNealy wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you Hao!
Colt McNealy
*Founder, LittleHorse.dev*
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Hao Li wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to open the vote for KIP-925: rack aware task assignment in Kafka
Streams
i all,
> >
> > Bump this thread again and see if we could get a few more votes.
> Currently
> > we have +2 non-binding and +1 binding.
> > Hoping we can get this approved, reviewed, and merged in time for 3.6.0.
> >
> > Best,
> > ShunKang
> >
> >
> > > >> KAFKA-15009 Handle new ACLs in KRaft snapshot
> >> > during
> >> > > > > migration
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> There is another issue KAFKA-15010 t
> > > > KAFKA-14887 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14887>
> ZK
> > > > session
> > > > > > timeout can cause broker to shutdown
> > > > > > - client
> > > > > > KAFKA-14639 <https://issues.apache.org/j
se broker to shutdown
> > > > > - client
> > > > > KAFKA-14639 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14639>
> > Kafka
> > > > > CooperativeStickyAssignor revokes/assigns partition in one
> rebalance
> > > cycle
> > > > > - conne
t; > > > > > > >> significant migration blocker
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
t; > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Christo,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Yes this is e
assigns partition in one rebalance
> > cycle
> > > > - connect
> > > > KAFKA-12558 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12558> MM2
> > may
> > > > not
> > > > sync partition offsets correctly
> > > > KAFKA-146
t; > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Clearly the layout of this page could be
> improved,
> > > if
> > > > you have
> > > > > > > > > > ideas
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > how to
> > >> > Mickael
> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:50 PM Mickael Maison <
> > > > > > > > > > > mickael.mai...@gmail
; > > > > > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/514
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
; On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:36 PM Christo Lolov <
> > > > > > > > > christolo...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hey Mickael!
> >
ate
> > > > > > > > >> > > > release.
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > * Built from the binary tar.gz source with Java 17 and
> > > > Scala
> > > &g
reviewed, and merged in time for 3.6.0.
>
> Best,
> ShunKang
>
> ShunKang Lin 于2023年5月7日周日 15:24写道：
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-872, which proposes to add
>> Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying.
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you Hao!
Colt McNealy
*Founder, LittleHorse.dev*
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Hao Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-925: rack aware task assignment in Kafka
> Streams. The link for the KIP is
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/
MM2
> may
> > > not
> > > sync partition offsets correctly
> > > KAFKA-14666 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14666> MM2
> should
> > > translate consumer group offsets behind replication flow
> > > - stream
> > > KAFKA-14172
Hi all,
I'd like to open the vote for KIP-925: rack aware task assignment in Kafka
Streams. The link for the KIP is
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-925%3A+Rack+aware+task+assignment+in+Kafka+Streams
.
--
Thanks,
Hao
ion flow
> > - stream
> > KAFKA-14172 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14172> bug: State
> > stores lose state when tasks are reassigned under EOS
> >
> >
> > Release notes for the 3.4.1 release:
> > https://home.apache.org/~showuon/kafka-3
Hi all,
Bump this thread again and see if we could get a few more votes. Currently
we have +2 non-binding and +1 binding.
Hoping we can get this approved, reviewed, and merged in time for 3.6.0.
Best,
ShunKang
ShunKang Lin 于2023年5月7日周日 15:24写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to open
(m6g.4xlarge) machines.
> > > > > > > >> > > > * Ran unit and integration tests on Intel and ARM
> > > machines.
> > > > > > > >> > > > * Ran the Quickstart in both Zookeeper and KRaft modes on
> > > > > Intel
> > > > > >
gt; > * I went through
> > https://kafka.apache.org/35/protocol.html
> > > > and
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > >> > are
> > > > > > >> > > > quite a few repetitive __tagged_fileds fields within the
> > same
; > >> > > > is this expected?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 12:01, Josep Prat
> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
EOS
>
>
> Release notes for the 3.4.1 release:
> https://home.apache.org/~showuon/kafka-3.4.1-rc3/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Jun 2, 2023
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
MM2 should
> > translate consumer group offsets behind replication flow
> > - stream
> > KAFKA-14172 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14172> bug: State
> > stores lose state when tasks are reassigned under EOS
> >
> >
> > Release notes for t
Release notes for the 3.4.1 release:
> https://home.apache.org/~showuon/kafka-3.4.1-rc3/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Jun 2, 2023
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
&g
the 3.4.1 release:
https://home.apache.org/~showuon/kafka-3.4.1-rc3/RELEASE_NOTES.html
*** Please download, test and vote by Jun 2, 2023
Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
* Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
https:
; > > > merged on Kafka site regarding the 3.5.0 version has a
> > problem
> > > > when
> > > > >> > it
> > > > >> > > > > states the version number and the sub-menu that links to
> > > > pre
901 - 1000 of 10355 matches
Mail list logo
