[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-2136:
---
Reviewer: Joel Koshy
Client side protocol changes to return quota delays
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2136:
--
Summary: Client side protocol changes to return quota delays
Key: KAFKA-2136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2136
Project: Kafka
Issue
9186c90de5a983a73b042fcb42987bfabae14fcf
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ReplicaManagerTest.scala
00d59337a99ac135e8689bd1ecd928f7b1423d79
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/DelayedOperationTest.scala
9186c90de5a983a73b042fcb42987bfabae14fcf
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ReplicaManagerTest.scala
00d59337a99ac135e8689bd1ecd928f7b1423d79
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
New tests added
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ReplicaManagerTest.scala
00d59337a99ac135e8689bd1ecd928f7b1423d79
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33378/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
such cases clearly for
quote actions mixed with ack = -1.
Guozhang
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Thanks for the review Guozhang.
1. Agreed.
2. This proposal actually waits for the maximum of the 2 timeouts. This
reduces
immediately, 3) after X ms elapsed, set
timeout-error-code and return.
Guozhang
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
This is an implementation proposal for delaying requests in quotas using
the current purgatory. I'll discuss the usage for produce
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:27 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [KIP-DISCUSSION] KIP-13 Quotas
I think KAFKA-2063 (bounding fetch response) is still under discussion, and
may not be got it in time with KAFKA-1927.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad
69b772c1941865fbe15b34bb2784c511f8ce519a
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaServer.scala
c63f4ba9d622817ea8636d4e6135fba917ce085a
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ClientQuotaMetricsTest.scala
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33049/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya
69b772c1941865fbe15b34bb2784c511f8ce519a
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaServer.scala
c63f4ba9d622817ea8636d4e6135fba917ce085a
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ClientQuotaMetricsTest.scala
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33049/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
, Aditya Auradkar wrote:
Hey everyone,
Following up after today's hangout. After discussing the client side metrics
piece internally, we've incorporated that section into the KIP.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Since there appears to be sufficient consensus, I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar resolved KAFKA-766.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in KAFKA-1546
Isr shrink/expand check is fragile
good to me.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Please vote.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Thanks,
Aditya
changes. What changes are you proposing in
the
clients for monitoring and how would that be used?
-Jay
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Hi Jay,
2. At this time, the proposed response format changes are only
really like to understand the details of
the
use
case before we make protocol changes. What changes are you proposing
in
the
clients for monitoring and how would that be used?
-Jay
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid
Please vote.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Thanks,
Aditya
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2097:
--
Summary: Implement request delays for quota violations
Key: KAFKA-2097
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2097
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
a small delay. I haven't worked out the
efficiency implications of this choice, so as long as we do that I'm happy.
-Jay
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Some responses to Jay's points.
1. Using commas - Cool.
2. Adding return flag - I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14396083#comment-14396083
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-2087:
[~jkreps] Yeah, I've discarded that patch
: Aditya Auradkar
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:10 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [KIP-DISCUSSION] KIP-13 Quotas
Thanks Jun.
Some thoughts:
10) I think it is better we throttle regardless of the produce/fetch version.
This is a nice feature where clients can tell if they are being throttled
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've made changes to the KIP to capture our discussions over the last
couple of weeks.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
I'll start a voting thread after people
to enforce quotas. That may be
simpler, but would be incur a slight perf penalty if too many clients
are being throttled.
Thanks,
Joel
-Jay
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Update, I added a proposal on doing dynamic client based
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2087:
--
Summary: TopicConfigManager javadoc references incorrect paths
Key: KAFKA-2087
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2087
Project: Kafka
/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32778/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/browse/KAFKA-2087
Repository: kafka
Description
---
Fixing KAFKA-2087
Diffs
-
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/TopicConfigManager.scala 47295d4
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32781/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the great discussion. There are currently a few
points
on
this
KIP that need addressing and I want to make sure we are on the
same
page
about those
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2083:
--
Summary: Quotas for Kafka
Key: KAFKA-2083
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2083
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: New Feature
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2084:
--
Summary: byte rate metrics per client ID (producer and consumer)
Key: KAFKA-2084
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2084
Project: Kafka
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-2085:
--
Summary: Return delay time in QuotaViolationException
Key: KAFKA-2085
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2085
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1546:
---
Attachment: documentation.diff
Automate replica lag tuning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14389441#comment-14389441
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
Good point Jun. I've added those metrics
to do this anyway since the new clients
are on KM metrics.
Thanks,
Joel
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 06:48:48PM +, Aditya Auradkar wrote:
Adding to what Jay said.
The library maintains 1k samples by default. The UniformSample has a
long array so about 8k overhead per
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
these issues, and ripped them out. Whether they are really useful
or not, I don't know. Averages can be pretty misleading so it can be nice
but I don't know that it is critical.
-Jay
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
From what I can tell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384734#comment-14384734
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
[~junrao] I found references
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384620#comment-14384620
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
[~jjkoshy] Where can I find the html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1546:
---
Attachment: documentation.diff
Automate replica lag tuning
/AbstractFetcherThread.scala
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/#comment126602
Can you add some documentation for this class?
- Aditya Auradkar
On March 27, 2015, 10:31 p.m., Sriharsha Chintalapani wrote:
---
This is an automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1546:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Automate replica lag tuning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14384759#comment-14384759
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
Added a patch for the HTML changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/#review77799
---
On March 25, 2015, 8:27 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote
/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/GC performance. IIRC, when I was looking into codahale at LinkedIn,
I remember it having quite a few memory management and GC issues while
using histograms. In comparison, histograms in the new metrics package
aren't very well tested.
Thanks,
Neha
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Aditya
/#review77810
---
On March 25, 2015, 8:27 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967
Hey everyone,
Picking up this discussion after yesterdays KIP hangout. For anyone who did not
join the meeting, we have 2 different metrics packages being used by the
clients (custom package) and the server (codahale). We are discussing whether
to migrate the server to the new package.
What
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/LogRecoveryTest.scala
92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya
that this KIP doesn't need to block on the
migration of the metrics package.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the great discussion. There are currently a few points on this
KIP that need addressing and I want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14370193#comment-14370193
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
[~nehanarkhede][~junrao] I've
.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Posted a KIP for quotas in kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Appreciate any
Hi Andrii,
Thanks for the writeup.
IMO, we should be able to support dynamically changing certain configs. For
example: the Quota proposal relies on such a mechanism for changing quotas on
the fly.
Aditya
From: Andrii Biletskyi
, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Posted a KIP for quotas in kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Appreciate any feedback.
Aditya
,
Aditya Auradkar
://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/#comment124449
Renamed.
We can use the raw offset directly, but in general the code is passing the
LogOffsetMetadata objects and it made sense to remain consistent.
- Aditya Auradkar
On March 16, 2015, 6:32 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote
PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Posted a KIP for quotas in kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Appreciate any feedback.
Aditya
://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/#comment124158
Interesting point. I thought that it would be enough to simply check the
lag value. But yes, this will cause the HW to be inconsistent.
- Aditya Auradkar
On March 12, 2015, 8:42 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote
/scala/unit/kafka/server/LogRecoveryTest.scala
92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/LogRecoveryTest.scala
92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
on the approach. Much better than before.
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Details in the KIP, Jira and RB.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+16+:+Automated+Replica+Lag+Tuning
https://issues.apache.org/jira
Rather, 6 binding +1's.
Aditya
From: Aditya Auradkar
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 10:39 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-16: Replica Lag Tuning
Thanks. We have 5 binding +1s. I'll update the KIP with your comments and mark
as accepted
?
- Aditya Auradkar
On March 14, 2015, 12:13 a.m., Joseph Holsten wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32063
Details in the KIP, Jira and RB.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+16+:+Automated+Replica+Lag+Tuning
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/
Aditya
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14359925#comment-14359925
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
I ran a bunch of tests on my patch
doing a good job of the windowed
metrics,
but
we'll want to integrate the backoff calculation with that
algorithm
(assuming that is what we are using).
Cheers,
-Jay
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad
c124c8df5b5079e5ffbd0c4ea359562a66aaf317
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/LogRecoveryTest.scala
92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1546.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+16+:+Automated+Replica+Lag+Tuning
The RB is here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1546.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+16+:+Automated+Replica+Lag+Tuning
The RB is here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/
Thanks,
Aditya
/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14359371#comment-14359371
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
[~jkreps]I'm going to test it like you
/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358074#comment-14358074
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
I'll write a short KIP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1930:
---
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar
Move server over to new metrics library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14358077#comment-14358077
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1930:
I plan to work on this ticket since
/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
c124c8df5b5079e5ffbd0c4ea359562a66aaf317
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/LogRecoveryTest.scala
92d6b2c672f74cdd526f2e98da8f7fb3696a88e3
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/SimpleFetchTest.scala
efb457334bd87e4c5b0dd2c66ae1995993cd0bc1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31967/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya
to integrate the backoff calculation with that algorithm
(assuming that is what we are using).
Cheers,
-Jay
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Aditya Auradkar
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Posted a KIP for quotas in kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA
Thanks for the writeup and RB Joe/Dmitry.
Is it possible to describe the proposed partition reassignment algorithm in
more detail on the KIP? In fact, it would be really easy to understand if we
had some concrete examples comparing partition assignment with the old
algorithm and the new.
Posted a KIP for quotas in kafka.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-13+-+Quotas
Appreciate any feedback.
Aditya
Congrats!
From: Andrew Otto [ao...@wikimedia.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:06 PM
To: us...@kafka.apache.org
Cc: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: Announcing the Confluent Platform built on Apache Kafka
Wow, .deb packages. I love you.
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1986:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Producer request failure rate should not include
/browse/KAFKA-1986
Repository: kafka
Description
---
Patch for KAFKA-1986
Diffs
-
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
586cf4caa95f58d5b2e6c7429732d25d2b3635c8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31449/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-1986:
--
Summary: Producer request failure rate should not include
InvalidMessageSizeException and OffsetOutOfRangeException
Key: KAFKA-1986
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30196/#review71556
---
On Feb. 2, 2015, 9:57 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote:
---
This is an automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14333735#comment-14333735
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1974:
[~nehanarkhede] I agree that a null check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14330026#comment-14330026
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1974:
Neha, do you have the entire stack trace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14328260#comment-14328260
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
I do have a concern about the heuristic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14328427#comment-14328427
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
I agree we should model this in terms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14328427#comment-14328427
]
Aditya Auradkar edited comment on KAFKA-1546 at 2/20/15 1:30 AM
/SimpleFetchTest.scala
525c835803b048c952667567cd205b4b06824391
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31168/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
All unit tests now pass.
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 9 mins 35.296 secs
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar reassigned KAFKA-1546:
--
Assignee: Aditya Auradkar (was: nicu marasoiu)
Automate replica lag tuning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14326773#comment-14326773
]
Aditya Auradkar commented on KAFKA-1546:
[~nmarasoi] I'm going to assign
525c835803b048c952667567cd205b4b06824391
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31168/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
/SimpleFetchTest.scala
525c835803b048c952667567cd205b4b06824391
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31168/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
All unit tests now pass.
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30570/#review72817
---
On Feb. 17, 2015, 11:46 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote
/
Testing
---
I've added asserts to the SimpleFetchTest to count the number of fetch
requests. I'm going to file an additional jira to add unit tests for all the
BrokerTopicMetrics updated via ReplicaManager
Thanks,
Aditya Auradkar
://reviews.apache.org/r/30570/#review72845
---
On Feb. 17, 2015, 11:46 p.m., Aditya Auradkar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1943:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: KAFKA-1946
Producer request failure rate
Aditya Auradkar created KAFKA-1946:
--
Summary: Improve BrokerTopicMetrics reporting
Key: KAFKA-1946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1946
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1914:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: KAFKA-1946
Count TotalProduceRequestRate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Auradkar updated KAFKA-1920:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: KAFKA-1946
Add a metric to count
301 - 400 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
