Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/274
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
There are way too many unready dependencies, agreed. Making JDK 9 a goal
for 4.2 sounds reasonable.
On 4 January 2017 at 07:10, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Agreed.
> Especially, things are still moving in the JDK land and we may expect
> additional breakages, so I would not hold Karaf 4.1 for that.
Ok, I'm rather fine with those perceptions,
In that case I'd revert the ASM 6.0 ALPHA dependencies for Pax-Web 6.0.1,
they're ALPHA right :)
and we will just call [1], as non fixable for 4.1, and post-pone this to a
4.2, with support for a Pax-Web 6.1.
In that case I'll just create a new 6.0.x bran
Agreed.
Especially, things are still moving in the JDK land and we may expect
additional breakages, so I would not hold Karaf 4.1 for that.
We can't really claim to support Java 9 support before it's even released
;-)
2017-01-04 13:33 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Hi Achim,
>
> For Karaf 4.1
+1.
It looks like we'll have a lot of work to do to have a full JDK9 support.
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Wednesday, January 4
Hi Achim,
For Karaf 4.1, the purpose is not to fully support JDK9 but to start the
required improvements.
I plan to release Karaf 4.1.0 by the end of this week as it is, with
full JDK8 support, and JDK9 support preview (not fully tested).
I would consider the full JDK9 support for Karaf 4.2
Hi,
got a question regarding Karaf 4.1 and JDK9 compatibility.
I've seen we had numerous issues regarding JDK9 for Karaf 4.1.
Is it our goal to have Karaf 4.1 runnable with JDK9?
If so, the ops4j community just came across some major drawbacks.
First it just seemed like we just need to bump the v
Github user zregvart closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/275
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena