[GitHub] karaf pull request #273: Remove duplicate copy resource step

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/273 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] karaf pull request #274: KARAF-4897 - Add an option to simplify bundle depen...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/274 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

There are way too many unready dependencies, agreed. Making JDK 9 a goal for 4.2 sounds reasonable. On 4 January 2017 at 07:10, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Agreed. > Especially, things are still moving in the JDK land and we may expect > additional breakages, so I would not hold

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

Ok, I'm rather fine with those perceptions, In that case I'd revert the ASM 6.0 ALPHA dependencies for Pax-Web 6.0.1, they're ALPHA right :) and we will just call [1], as non fixable for 4.1, and post-pone this to a 4.2, with support for a Pax-Web 6.1. In that case I'll just create a new 6.0.x

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

Agreed. Especially, things are still moving in the JDK land and we may expect additional breakages, so I would not hold Karaf 4.1 for that. We can't really claim to support Java 9 support before it's even released ;-) 2017-01-04 13:33 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

+1. It looks like we'll have a lot of work to do to have a full JDK9 support. -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix Committer Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Wednesday, January

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

Hi Achim, For Karaf 4.1, the purpose is not to fully support JDK9 but to start the required improvements. I plan to release Karaf 4.1.0 by the end of this week as it is, with full JDK8 support, and JDK9 support preview (not fully tested). I would consider the full JDK9 support for Karaf

Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

Hi, got a question regarding Karaf 4.1 and JDK9 compatibility. I've seen we had numerous issues regarding JDK9 for Karaf 4.1. Is it our goal to have Karaf 4.1 runnable with JDK9? If so, the ops4j community just came across some major drawbacks. First it just seemed like we just need to bump the

[GitHub] karaf pull request #275: KARAF-4917 Support dynamicaliy registered configura...

Github user zregvart closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/275 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is