Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Hello again I have: - released pax-web 6.0.10 - upgraded pax-cdi master branch to depend on pax-web 6.0.10 (and fixed some tests) - now pax-cdi builds fine - tests should be run (no idea why) by "cd itest; mvn clean install" So it's now possible to release pax-cdi (1.0.0.RC3 or just (finally!) 1.0.0) and then use 1.0.0 in pax-web 7.0.0 best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-19 11:17 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz : > On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Hi, > > > After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA. > > > > I have three actions on the way: > > > > 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty > part > > on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It > takes > > a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). > > This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to > have > > a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know. > > +1 for M3 with Pax Web 7 > > > 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed > days > > ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to > > have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start > > with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples > > (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea > is to > > include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the > > developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these > > examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, > > but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the > > examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples > > pom.xml for the list of examples). > > > > Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so. > > Thanks, JB! > > O. > > > Regards > > JB > >
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, Hi, > After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA. > > I have three actions on the way: > > 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty part > on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes > a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). > This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have > a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know. +1 for M3 with Pax Web 7 > 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed days > ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to > have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start > with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples > (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is to > include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the > developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these > examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, > but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the > examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples > pom.xml for the list of examples). > > Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so. Thanks, JB! O. > Regards > JB
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
+1 Regards JB On 19/02/2018 09:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I'll release pax-jms and pax-cdi today and upgrade those. 2018-02-19 8:54 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek : Hello 2018-02-19 8:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : Thanks for the update Grzegorz. I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on this one. For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features . I can help on this & release. Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any link to pax-web. And to be honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in / - I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature repositories in my custom Karaf distro... regards Grzegorz Grzybek Regards JB On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA! From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and 8.x (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major increase. Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT, 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT) because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments. Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or at least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit / tying to any particular version of pax-web). best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : Hi guys, After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA. I have three actions on the way: 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty part on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know. 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed days ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is to include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples). Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so. Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
I'll release pax-jms and pax-cdi today and upgrade those. 2018-02-19 8:54 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek : > Hello > > 2018-02-19 8:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Thanks for the update Grzegorz. > > > > I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on this > > one. > > > > For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features . I > > can help on this & release. > > > > Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any link to pax-web. And to be > honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in / > - I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature > repositories in my custom Karaf distro... > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > > >> Hello > >> > >> I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA! > >> > >> From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and > >> 8.x > >> (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major > increase. > >> Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT, > >> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT) > >> because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments. > >> > >> Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or > at > >> least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit > >> / tying to any particular version of pax-web). > >> > >> best regards > >> Grzegorz Grzybek > >> > >> 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > >> > >> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA. > >>> > >>> I have three actions on the way: > >>> > >>> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty > >>> part on > >>> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It > takes > >>> a > >>> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). > >>> This > >>> point > >>> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a > >>> 4.2.0.M3 with > >>> this update, please let me know. > >>> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed > >>> days ago. > >>> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to > >>> have. > >>> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with > >>> Karaf, > >>> François and I are working on a set of examples > >>> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea > is > >>> to > >>> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the > >>> developer > >>> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as > >>> well, > >>> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to > have. > >>> Please, > >>> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are > >>> in > >>> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of > >>> examples). > >>> > >>> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >>> > >> > -- Guillaume Nodet