Hello again I have: - released pax-web 6.0.10 - upgraded pax-cdi master branch to depend on pax-web 6.0.10 (and fixed some tests) - now pax-cdi builds fine - tests should be run (no idea why) by "cd itest; mvn clean install"
So it's now possible to release pax-cdi (1.0.0.RC3 or just (finally!) 1.0.0) and then use 1.0.0 in pax-web 7.0.0 best regards Grzegorz Grzybek 2018-02-19 11:17 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: > On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Hi, > > > After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA. > > > > I have three actions on the way: > > > > 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty > part > > on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It > takes > > a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). > > This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to > have > > a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know. > > +1 for M3 with Pax Web 7 > > > 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed > days > > ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to > > have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start > > with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples > > (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea > is to > > include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the > > developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these > > examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, > > but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the > > examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples > > pom.xml for the list of examples). > > > > Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so. > > Thanks, JB! > > O. > > > Regards > > JB > >
