subject:"Re\: Review Request 52040\: Handling data delay"

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-10-21 Thread Lavkesh Lahngir

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52040/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2016, 8:56 a.m.) Review request for lens. Changes ---

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-10-03 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52040/#review151147 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Amareshwari Sriramadasu On Sept. 30,

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-30 Thread Lavkesh Lahngir

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52040/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2016, 1 p.m.) Review request for lens. Bugs: LENS-1327

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-30 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu

> On Sept. 29, 2016, 4:58 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote: > > lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceState.java, > > line 60 > > > > > > I'm still wondering if there should be

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-30 Thread Lavkesh Lahngir

> On Sept. 29, 2016, 4:58 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote: > > lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceState.java, > > line 60 > > > > > > I'm still wondering if there should be

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-28 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52040/#review150810 ---

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-26 Thread Lavkesh Lahngir

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52040/ --- (Updated Sept. 26, 2016, 9:53 a.m.) Review request for lens. Bugs: LENS-1327

Re: Review Request 52040: Handling data delay

2016-09-20 Thread Lavkesh Lahngir

> On Sept. 20, 2016, 10:30 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote: > > lens-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/api/scheduler/SchedulerJobInstanceState.java, > > line 62 > > > > > > Do we need ON_CONDITIONS_NOT_MET to be