Thank you Aniket,
OpenKontrail sounds great.
Regards,
Masood
From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org] On Behalf Of Aniket
Daptari
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:40 PM
To: Randy Bias
Cc: annou...@lists.opencontrail.org; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject:
And therefore, with that example (Xen v/s Xen Project) in front of us, if
the LF project can absolutely NOT be named OpenContrail or "OpenContrail
Project", then why not call it "OpenKontrail Project" or something really
close to the original name?
Thanks,
Aniket
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:38
Hi,
Thanks for the input. Just a reminder that I gave y’all a heads up
on this in early December and we discussed it in detail at the governance
summit at Kubecon as well. There should be zero surprised to anyone that we
can’t proceed with OpenContrail.
As a
If trademarks were solely about finding something that no one else is using it
would make what is already a tremendously difficult exercise basically
impossible. We would all be making up nonsense words in order to get something
no one else used.
Trademarks infringement is defined as
We have tried to push the Contrail issue all the way up to C-level at Juniper.
Contrail represents a whole group of products of which OpenContrail/Contrail
Networking is just a part.
They spent too much money and time marketing the name, they will not abandon it.
This like going to Cisco and
The Linux Foundation refuses to accept the OpenContrail trademark if they can’t
also have the Contrail trademark. So, although you feel that they are not
similar, we don’t have any leverage to override LF’s decision. Unless you
really think we should abandon the move to LF (please don’t) and go
Hi Greg,
I'm concerned a bit about Tesserax being too close to Tesseract, which
is a well-known open-source OCR (and also a registered trademark owned
by someone else). Sounds very similar to Firebird (RDBMS) vs Firebird
(now Firefox) issue of the early 2000s.
My two cents,
Valentine
On
Hi Edgar,
> In my opinion, these three names sound awful.
Completely agree ! Terrible. Why not something very easy like CFabric ? (Oh
no it starts with bad letter "c" ;-).
> Maybe we could negotiate with Juniper ...
Exactly proposed the same few months back (when this all started to
surface).