Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru)
Storage class might fix this issue but am not convinced fully claiming a PV without using selector. It bypasses protection offer by storage label selectors. Again, we have to wait for 3.4 and upgrade 3.3. some more work. -- Srinivas Kotaru From: Brad Childs Date: Friday, January 13, 2017 at 1

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Brad Childs
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) < skot...@cisco.com> wrote: > Can you explain or point a documentation on how to use storage class? I > don’t see any document on storage class yet, at least OSE 3.3. I heard that > feature will be releasing in 3.4. > Sorry I should

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru)
Can you explain or point a documentation on how to use storage class? I don’t see any document on storage class yet, at least OSE 3.3. I heard that feature will be releasing in 3.4. -- Srinivas Kotaru From: Brad Childs Date: Friday, January 13, 2017 at 11:59 AM To: Srinivas Naga Kotaru Cc: N

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Brad Childs
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) < skot...@cisco.com> wrote: > Perfect, that answer and clarify. Thank you, Nakayama, > > > > > > I was able to bound a PV which has label selectors using a PVC which > doesn’t have any selectors. This behavior completely makes useles

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Clayton Coleman
Brad, can you comment? On Jan 13, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) < skot...@cisco.com> wrote: Perfect, that answer and clarify. Thank you, Nakayama, I was able to bound a PV which has label selectors using a PVC which doesn’t have any selectors. This behavior completely make

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru)
Perfect, that answer and clarify. Thank you, Nakayama, I was able to bound a PV which has label selectors using a PVC which doesn’t have any selectors. This behavior completely makes useless our storage labeling strategy. We want to label few volumes (special volumes by cost/performance/size)

Re: storage labels

2017-01-13 Thread Nakayama Kenjiro
I think that following sentence in the docs is wrong(?). https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/install_config/storage_examples/binding_pv_by_label.html "It is important to note that a claim must match all of the key-value pairs included in its selector stanza." In my understanding,