Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

there is no point to scrutinize iriduim (or ungoogled or any other derived browser) - their codebase is probably 99% similar to chromium; so if any of these have licensing issues it would be most likely what they derive from chromium - i would not begin to look at derivatives or qtwebengine until

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

2017-11-15T13:12:23-0800 jc_gargma wrote: > When you post the results of QtWebEngine, please cc > qtwebeng...@qt-project.org > so that they are not left out of the loop this time. > Qt is a friend to the free software community. Please give them the chance to > fix the issues. > > > -jc Could

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

That's marvelous, thanks again, Josh On 30/11/17 12:02, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: See the update in the related thread. I'm seeding the text file. 2017-11-15T20:08:35+ Josh Branning wrote: Thank you for this. Could I also request you upload the text file(s) somewhere? I can't seem

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

See the update in the related thread. I'm seeding the text file. 2017-11-15T20:08:35+ Josh Branning wrote: > Thank you for this. > > Could I also request you upload the text file(s) somewhere? I can't > seem to download them from the lists.gnu.org archive, and that may be > a problem for

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

Yes, on a wiki would be good/fine. :) Unsure about any maintenance ... Thanks again, Josh On 15/11/17 20:39, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: I'd prefer a wiki or a temporary repository. Pads are OK but hard to keep track of changes without a browser with enough resources and speed to run the

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

I'd prefer a wiki or a temporary repository. Pads are OK but hard to keep track of changes without a browser with enough resources and speed to run the JS and live updates. I'll see where I can put the list. I just notice that the FSD is having some downtime, perhaps they're doing maintainance.

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

> I'll try doing the same steps for Iridium and QtWebEngine. When you post the results of QtWebEngine, please cc qtwebeng...@qt-project.org so that they are not left out of the loop this time. Qt is a friend to the free software community. Please give them the chance to fix the issues. -jc

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

Thank you for this. Could I also request you upload the text file(s) somewhere? I can't seem to download them from the lists.gnu.org archive, and that may be a problem for people who wish to help try and clarify the licenses. May also be worth creating a pad, and seeing if people are willing

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

See the response I gave ([1]) to the new thread in the directory-discuss mailing list ([2]). Apparently it didn't change much, also considering the ambiguities I noted on [1].. I'll try doing the same steps for Iridium and QtWebEngine. [1]

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

On 15/11/17 16:42, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: I also have contributed to that thread on directory-discuss mailing list. I hope it helps somehow. ;) bill-auger writes: there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you can watch if you like

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

I also have contributed to that thread on directory-discuss mailing list. I hope it helps somehow. ;) bill-auger writes: > there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you > can watch if you like > > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167 > > i

Re: [Dev] Is Iridium safe to use?

On 11/10/2017 03:14 PM, happy gnu wrote: > But what about iridium? there is an open issue about this on the parabola bug tracker that you can watch if you like https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167 i asked donaldr about this last week and he asked that i post to the FSD mailing list so