Re: Removal of `log4j-jcl` in `3.x`

+1 Piotr, you populated #2163 tasks last week and there asked to port `log4j-jcl` changes from `2.x` to `main`. That is what I spent my yesterday with. I would appreciate it if you can share these kinds of developments earlier. Putting that as

Re: Removal of `log4j-jcl` in `3.x`

Fine by me. Ralph > On Jan 10, 2024, at 3:11 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi all, > > Since `commons-logging` 1.3.0 was published last month and it supports > Log4j API out-of-the-box, does it still make sense to keep `log4j-jcl` > around in 3.x? > > I would keep the 2.x version, so that u

Removal of `log4j-jcl` in `3.x`

Hi all, Since `commons-logging` 1.3.0 was published last month and it supports Log4j API out-of-the-box, does it still make sense to keep `log4j-jcl` around in 3.x? I would keep the 2.x version, so that users don't need to modify their stacks. However we might assume that 3.x adopters are already