New Java 9 module and build

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory
When I build (with Java 8) I now see: [INFO] --- maven-assembly-plugin:3.0.0:single (zip) @ log4j-api-java9 --- [INFO] Reading assembly descriptor: src/assembly/java9.xml *[ERROR] OS=Windows and the assembly descriptor contains a *nix-specific root-relative-reference (starting with slash)

Re: Log4j - Java 9

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory
OK, thanks. I just made an updated to the POM to allow building to proceed a little further with Java 9 as the JDK. Has anyone managed to run a whole build on Java 9? Gary On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Log4j-perf, log4j-samples,

Re: Log4j - Java 9

2017-06-18 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks - I didn’t notice I had left that lying around. I have deleted it. Ralph > On Jun 18, 2017, at 5:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I am confused by the layout: there is a log4j-api-java9 folder inside > the log4j-api-java9 folder? > > Gary > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017

Re: Log4j - Java 9

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory
I am confused by the layout: there is a log4j-api-java9 folder inside the log4j-api-java9 folder? Gary On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > Ralph, thank you!! > I just tried it and it works great. All I needed to do was tell IntelliJ > IDEA to use Java 9

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-1945) Generate source jas for all test jars

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory closed LOG4J2-1945. Resolution: Fixed In Git master already. > Generate source jas for all test jars >

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1945) Generate source jas for all test jars

2017-06-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16053345#comment-16053345 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1945: - Commit

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1945) Generate source jas for all test jars

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated LOG4J2-1945: - Description: Generate source jas for all test jars and publish them to our Maven repositories.

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1945) Generate source jas for all test jars

2017-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
Gary Gregory created LOG4J2-1945: Summary: Generate source jas for all test jars Key: LOG4J2-1945 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1945 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: New

Re: Log4j - Java 9

2017-06-18 Thread Remko Popma
Ralph, thank you!! I just tried it and it works great. All I needed to do was tell IntelliJ IDEA to use Java 9 for the log4j-api-java9 module and it all just works in the IDE again. Great, thanks again! Remko On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I

Log4j - Java 9

2017-06-18 Thread Ralph Goers
I have modified the Java 9 support yet again. I was having a problem with a Maven plugin I am building where the Maven annotation processor was failing because it was finding a Java 9 class that it couldn’t read. To fix this I have separated the Java 9 support to its own module and then am

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1874) Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) methods and call them from TextEncoderHelper whenever possible

2017-06-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16053089#comment-16053089 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1874: - Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-1874) Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) methods and call them from TextEncoderHelper whenever possible

2017-06-18 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma resolved LOG4J2-1874. - Resolution: Fixed Thank you for your patience. Pull request #71, with some minor changes, has

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1874) Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) methods and call them from TextEncoderHelper whenever possible

2017-06-18 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16053086#comment-16053086 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1874: - Commit

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1874) Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) methods and call them from TextEncoderHelper whenever possible

2017-06-18 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1874: Affects Version/s: 2.6 > Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int)

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-1874) Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) methods and call them from TextEncoderHelper whenever possible

2017-06-18 Thread Remko Popma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Remko Popma updated LOG4J2-1874: Fix Version/s: 2.9 > Add ByteBufferDestionation.write(ByteBuffer) and write(byte[], int, int) >

Re: HttpAppenderTest fails randomly and often

2017-06-18 Thread Matt Sicker
The stack trace mentions the possibility of System.exit being called. We had a bug like that in the past with the Cassandra tests on Windows, and we solved that with some sort of SecurityManager overriding. On 18 June 2017 at 01:01, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > Did the forked JVM

Re: HttpAppenderTest fails randomly and often

2017-06-18 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Did the forked JVM crash? Do you find any JVM dump file? If so, maybe you should report this as a JVM bug to Oracle? On 2017-06-05 21:21, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All, The HttpAppenderTest fails randomly and often (see below). This is a fairly new test. Can whom ever authored it have a look