for everyones benefit.
I started putting together a home server this weekend (not because we're
going use that as a build server, but because I needed a sandbox to install
jenkins to see which plugins work and which do not)
It seems like there has been constant trickle in of issues from
Hello all,
I'm curious how closely tied the JCC/Lucene wrappers are to Python. I've
been looking for a way to use Lucene from C/C++. I'm aware of CLucene, but
it appears to have some serious issues, and I was pointed to PyLucene. Is it
conceivable that one could use the JCC-generated code from
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:15, Ken O'Brien k...@kenobrien.org wrote:
To clarify, I've not yet written any code. I aim to bring a large speedup to
any functionality that is computationally expensive. I'm wondering which
components are candidates for this.
I'll be looking through the code but
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5887/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006182#comment-13006182
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006181#comment-13006181
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006180#comment-13006180
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
This
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Simon these are great summaries -- can you post them on the issues too?
Thanks!
done!
simon
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey,
On Sat, Mar 12,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006185#comment-13006185
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
{quote}
Moving stuff from Solr to Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006187#comment-13006187
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2308:
bq. I'm surprised to barely even see a mention
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5874/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:0 but was:1
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006192#comment-13006192
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2944:
-
I had a brief review - naming looks
Hey folks,
I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
the developments that have been made in Solr land during the past with
very little success. Actually, it was a really disappointing
experience
On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
Hey folks,
I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
the developments that have been made in Solr land during the past with
very little
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006213#comment-13006213
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
bq. I think there is a lot of overlap but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006214#comment-13006214
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-2960:
Just a note regarding the IWC and being able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006215#comment-13006215
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
{quote}
I think there is a lot of
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I guess the question people w/ Solr only hats on have (if there are such
people), is which way is that street going? It seems like most people want
to pull stuff out of Solr, but they don't seem to want to put into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006222#comment-13006222
]
Elmar Pitschke commented on LUCENE-2749:
Hi,
i am fairly new to Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006223#comment-13006223
]
Zhijie Shen commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
I've some questions here to make sure I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006227#comment-13006227
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2960:
-
{quote}
Why such purity? What do we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006251#comment-13006251
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2958:
A thought -- how about we do the following:
#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006254#comment-13006254
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2749:
-
Hi Elmar,
I haven't had a chance to do more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-2958:
Attachment: LUCENE-2958.patch
bq. Will that be simpler?
It will be simpler, I admit, but it will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006269#comment-13006269
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2958:
-
Rethinking this suggestion, I am afraid it
It's good to see this discussion finally happen. Some things are in Solr
(e.g. faceting, function queries, Yonik's recent join patch, ...) that
probably belong in Lucene. As someone contributing functionality to
Lucene/Solr in SOLR-2155 (Geospatial search via geohash prefix techniques),
Vectorizable code would be the major target, yes.
Do you know if the guys from Yandex were using CUDA or OpenCL approaches? or
the old kind of opengl hacks.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:15, Ken O'Brien k...@kenobrien.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006284#comment-13006284
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-1725:
This capability is awesome, just as it's DIH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2347:
Component/s: contrib - DataImportHandler
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006285#comment-13006285
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2347:
-
This now only affects DIH anymore.
DIH have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006286#comment-13006286
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2347:
---
bq. which is no problem as DIH is contrib and
firstSearcher Listener of SpellChecker can be never called
--
Key: SOLR-2425
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2425
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006313#comment-13006313
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2425:
--
bq. At the time, firstSearcherListeners
There were experiments with moving both pieces of code to the GPU, and
GPU did well in terms of speed, but they say getting data in and out
of GPU made the approach unfeasible.
That would be the problem with GPUs :) Co-processors always have this
problem. GPUs were designed for 3d video games-
I see. I will conduct my own experiments with more recent GPU libraries.
Thanks for everyone's input.
On Mar 14, 2011 2:30 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
There were experiments with moving both pieces of code to the GPU, and
GPU did well in terms of speed, but they say getting data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006330#comment-13006330
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2337:
-
The only downfall with this patch, is the hits=10 means
36 matches
Mail list logo
