[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15037948#comment-15037948 ] Romain MERESSE commented on SOLR-2649: -- Very high criticality for me too. Why is it a minor priority ?

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson reassigned SOLR-8292: Assignee: Erick Erickson > TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8251) MatchAllDocsQuery is much slower in solr5.3.1 compare to solr4.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15037982#comment-15037982 ] Adrien Grand commented on SOLR-8251: Thanks Uwe, I was just going to write a similar comment. >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8251) MatchAllDocsQuery is much slower in solr5.3.1 compare to solr4.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15037968#comment-15037968 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-8251: - Hi, [~jpountz] committed LUCENE-6889 (Lucene / Solr 5.5), maybe

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5205) SpanQueryParser with recursion, analysis and syntax very similar to classic QueryParser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038025#comment-15038025 ] Modassar Ather commented on LUCENE-5205: Thanks for your response. Just thought of checking if

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038355#comment-15038355 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2649: -- [~ysee...@gmail.com] [~janhoy] [~hossman] [~rmuir] [~dsmiley]

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2649: --- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > MM ignored in edismax queries with operators >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8363) luceneMatchVerision in solrconfigs under the example directory don't get updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038302#comment-15038302 ] Upayavira commented on SOLR-8363: - [~varunthacker] can you commit this to 5_4, both the fix above, and also

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6815) Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-6815: - Attachment: LUCENE-6815.patch Updated patch. This now leverages the new matchCost() API in order

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-5211) updating parent as childless makes old children orphans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-5211: --- Fix Version/s: 5.5 > updating parent as childless makes old children orphans >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038512#comment-15038512 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2649: Changed from "Bug" to "Improvement" as the code seems to reflect

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038544#comment-15038544 ] Thomas Egense commented on SOLR-2649: - It is a clear "Bug" in the following case: MM=100% and default

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6815) Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038553#comment-15038553 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6815: -- In case you are not adding SpanOr here, could you open a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038585#comment-15038585 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-2649: -- The behavior of mm only applying to the top-level query is not

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038596#comment-15038596 ] Ahmet Arslan commented on SOLR-2649: bq. do we have a consensus on what the new behavior should be? I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5211) updating parent as childless makes old children orphans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038628#comment-15038628 ] Upayavira commented on SOLR-5211: - It seems there's two ways to do this: Either we have the index "work

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038626#comment-15038626 ] Greg Pendlebury commented on SOLR-2649: --- I tried Jan's patch, and (whilst it is technically correct)

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_66) - Build # 5442 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/5442/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_66 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestStressReplication Error Message: timed out waiting for collection1 startAt time to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8353) Support regex for skipping license checksums

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038781#comment-15038781 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8353: --- Commit 1717872 from

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8353) Support regex for skipping license checksums

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gregory Chanan resolved SOLR-8353. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.5 Trunk Committed to 5.5 and trunk.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038738#comment-15038738 ] Mike commented on SOLR-2649: I know this is a spamming comment, but I can't help but say how excited I am this

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038738#comment-15038738 ] Mike edited comment on SOLR-2649 at 12/3/15 10:33 PM: -- I know this is a spammy

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038767#comment-15038767 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2649: bq. I view current behavior as a bug A bug in the idea? That's

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8353) Support regex for skipping license checksums

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038778#comment-15038778 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8353: --- Commit 1717870 from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7341) xjoin - join data from external sources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038800#comment-15038800 ] Gopal Patwa commented on SOLR-7341: --- [~Tomjon] could you make a patch working with 5.x? we are exploring

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038658#comment-15038658 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2649: -- [~gpendleb] Just to make sure we're talking about the same

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038679#comment-15038679 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2649: -- OK, all tests pass with with this patch. There is one (and

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8366) ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient attempts to use response's content type as charset encoding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-8366: Attachment: SOLR-8336.patch Trivial fix attached. > ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038688#comment-15038688 ] Greg Pendlebury commented on SOLR-2649: --- Mine shows as 18th Feb, but I assume that is just timezones.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038700#comment-15038700 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2649: --- I'm positive to the latest combined approach, although I have not

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8065) Improve the start/stop script shutdown logic to avoid forcefully killing Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038805#comment-15038805 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8065: --- We should probably be willing to wait a lot longer than 30 seconds

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8365) If you change LogUpdateProcessor logging from info, rather than turning off update logging, you send more useless update logging to the SolrCore RequestLog.

Mark Miller created SOLR-8365: - Summary: If you change LogUpdateProcessor logging from info, rather than turning off update logging, you send more useless update logging to the SolrCore RequestLog. Key: SOLR-8365

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (LUCENE-6815) Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-6815: - Comment: was deleted (was: In case you are not adding SpanOr here, could you open a similar

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5211) updating parent as childless makes old children orphans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038352#comment-15038352 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-5211: I want to address this. Thus, we have to assign identifier

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x - Build # 1035 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/1035/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.hadoop.MorphlineBasicMiniMRTest.mrRun Error Message: Failed on local exception: java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer; Host Details : local host is:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8366) ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient attempts to use response's content type as charset encoding

Shalin Shekhar Mangar created SOLR-8366: --- Summary: ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient attempts to use response's content type as charset encoding Key: SOLR-8366 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8366

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038626#comment-15038626 ] Greg Pendlebury edited comment on SOLR-2649 at 12/3/15 9:31 PM: I tried

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8367) The new LIR 'all replicas participate' failsafe code needs to be improved.

Mark Miller created SOLR-8367: - Summary: The new LIR 'all replicas participate' failsafe code needs to be improved. Key: SOLR-8367 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8367 Project: Solr

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8367) The new LIR 'all replicas participate' failsafe code needs to be improved.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-8367: -- Description: For one, it currently only kicks in the first attempted leader. If it's another replica

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.4 - Build # 8 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.4/8/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Could not load collection from ZK:halfdeletedcollection2 Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Could not load

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2649) MM ignored in edismax queries with operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038840#comment-15038840 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2649: --- bq. A bug in the idea Well, perhaps not a bug from developer intent

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5211) updating parent as childless makes old children orphans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038858#comment-15038858 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5211: I thought i had made this straw many suggestion in some jira at some

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8368) A SolrCore needs to replay it's tlog before the leader election process.

Mark Miller created SOLR-8368: - Summary: A SolrCore needs to replay it's tlog before the leader election process. Key: SOLR-8368 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8368 Project: Solr

Re: Solr search

Hi, Thanks to Upayavira ,Shawn Heisey, Uwe and Benson and appreciate them for helping me providing necessary information. I was trying to understand the usage and licensing of following files, for using SOLR for our client project. 1. Tagsoup 1.2.1 2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13 3.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7672) introduce implicit _parent_:true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038194#comment-15038194 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-7672: just an idea for further consideration, when

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7672) introduce implicit _parent_:true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15039542#comment-15039542 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-7672: Yeah, that probably works. We can always just use some syntactic

Re: A 5.4 release?

Sure. The last message on the thread was from about 8 days ago so I wasn't sure if it would be a while before the RC was cut giving this enough time on the branch. In any case, I agree with not shoving things in last moment. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira wrote: >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.7.0) - Build # 2857 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX/2857/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestIndexAndConfigAliasReplication Error Message:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7672) introduce implicit _parent_:true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038213#comment-15038213 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-7672: [~ysee...@gmail.com] my turn: {{_type_:_root_}} and spin

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6910) fix 2 interesting and 2 trivial issues found by "Coverity scan results of Lucene"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15038217#comment-15038217 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6910: - Commit 1717820 from

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.9.0-ea-b93) - Build # 15104 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/15104/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.9.0-ea-b93 -client -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:-CompactStrings 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest Error Message: 5 threads leaked from SUITE scope at

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2556) Spellcheck component not returned with numeric queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer resolved SOLR-2556. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.5 > Spellcheck component not returned with numeric queries >

<    1   2