[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-8.x - Build # 10 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-8.x/10/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 61429 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj1525971818 [ecj-lint] Compiling 940 source files to /tmp/ecj1525971818 [ecj-lint] invalid Class-Path

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 7709 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/7709/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.core.ExitableDirectoryReaderTest.testCacheAssumptions Error Message: Should have fewer docs than 100 Stack Trace:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x - Build # 439 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-7.x/439/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete.testUpdatesOnDiskFull Error Message: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached. Stack Trace: java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite

Re: Solr Size Limitation upto 32 kb limitation

I guess selfwritten loader means that you split up the file in 32 kB chunks or smaller and then posts each of those 32 kB chunks to the multi valued field. > Am 18.01.2019 um 11:51 schrieb Kranthi Kumar K > : > > Hi team, > > Thank you Erick Erickson ,Bernd Fehling , Jan Hoydahl for your

RE: Solr Size Limitation upto 32 kb limitation

Thanks @Kranthi Kumar K for following up From: Kranthi Kumar K Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2019 4:51 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org; solr-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: Ananda Babu medida ; Srinivasa Reddy Karri ; Michelle Ngo ; Ravi Vangala ; Suresh Malladi ;

RE: Solr Size Limitation upto 32 kb limitation

Thank you Bernd Fehling for your suggested solution, I've tried the same by changing the type and added multivalued to true in Schema.xml file i.e, change from: Changed to: After changing it also still we are unable to import the files size > 32 kb. please find the solution suggested by

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 75 - Still Failing!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/75/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 61442 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj1060047510 [ecj-lint] Compiling 940 source

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 21 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Solaris/21/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 61400 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /var/tmp/ecj587420115 [ecj-lint] Compiling 940 source files

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-10.0.1) - Build # 153 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-master-Linux/153/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10.0.1 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 15525 lines...] [junit4] JVM J2: stdout was not empty, see:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 2719 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-repro/2719/ [...truncated 28 lines...] [repro] Jenkins log URL: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/434/consoleText [repro] Revision: 1911b3f71ef83f568993106ccd97cff35205f8da [repro] Ant options:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1018 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Solaris/1018/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudRecovery.leaderRecoverFromLogOnStartupTest Error Message: expected:<4> but was:<2> Stack Trace:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x - Build # 435 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-7.x/435/ No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 23461 lines...] [asciidoctor:convert] asciidoctor: ERROR: about-this-guide.adoc: line 1: invalid part, must have at least one section (e.g., chapter, appendix, etc.)

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-master - Build # 3155 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-master/3155/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestPrepRecovery.testLeaderUnloaded Error Message: Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:34371/solr: At least one of the node(s) specified [127.0.0.1:34371_solr] are not currently

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2272 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/2272/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 61354 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /var/tmp/ecj2145398945 [ecj-lint] Compiling 942

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 3445 - Still Failing!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/3445/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.MathExpressionTest.testGammaDistribution Error Message: 0.817115014246372 0.8456673276237348 Stack

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13156) Limiting field facet with certain terms via {!terms} not taking into account sorting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750592#comment-16750592 ] superman369 commented on SOLR-13156: @[~ysee...@gmail.com], thank you very much!   could you tell me

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-8.x - Build # 7 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-8.x/7/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeWithPullReplicasTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!! [MMapDirectory, MMapDirectory,

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 74 - Still Failing!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/74/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseG1GC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 59727 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj1854361666 [ecj-lint] Compiling 940 source files to

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 23565 - Still Failing!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/23565/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.CollectionsAPIAsyncDistributedZkTest.testAsyncRequests Error Message: AddReplica did not

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-master - Build # 268 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-master/268/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestRequestForwarding.testMultiCollectionQuery Error Message: Query 'q=cat%3Afootball%5E2' failed, Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Query 'q=cat%3Afootball%5E2'

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 3444 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/3444/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 59646 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj1986404144 [ecj-lint] Compiling 937 source files to

Re: [DISCUSS] Opening old indices for reading

+1, A lot of this was discussed on SOLR-12259, we should probably link any Lucene JIRAs for this back to that one to make an easy trail to follow. One thing I'd thought of is whether we should merge segments during this operation. If we're going to rewrite the entire index anyway, does it make

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-repro - Build # 2718 - Still unstable

Error processing tokens: Error while parsing action 'Text/ZeroOrMore/FirstOf/Token/DelimitedToken/DelimitedToken_Action3' at input position (line 23, pos 4): )"} ^ java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space - To

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 73 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/73/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 4 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudSearcherWarming Error Message: 5 threads leaked from SUITE scope at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8653) Reverse FST storage so it can be read forward

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750314#comment-16750314 ] Lucene/Solr QA commented on LUCENE-8653: | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8635) Lazy loading Lucene FST offheap using mmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750316#comment-16750316 ] Ankit Jain edited comment on LUCENE-8635 at 1/23/19 6:47 PM: - {quote}Ankit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8635) Lazy loading Lucene FST offheap using mmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750316#comment-16750316 ] Ankit Jain commented on LUCENE-8635: {quote}Ankit Jain unfortunately RandomAccessInput doesn't offer

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master - Build # 1241 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master/1241/ No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 23461 lines...] [asciidoctor:convert] asciidoctor: ERROR: about-this-guide.adoc: line 1: invalid part, must have at least one section (e.g., chapter, appendix, etc.)

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 23564 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/23564/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseG1GC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 59720 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj140128490 [ecj-lint] Compiling 942 source files to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-13162) Admin UI development-test cycle is slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750273#comment-16750273 ] Jeremy Branham edited comment on SOLR-13162 at 1/23/19 5:53 PM: Hey Jan -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13162) Admin UI development-test cycle is slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750273#comment-16750273 ] Jeremy Branham commented on SOLR-13162: --- Hey Jan - That's great, I didn't know about

Re: [DISCUSS] Opening old indices for reading

+1. I think that even with these caveats (read-only, some data may require re-interpretation) it would still be a great help for accessing legacy data, for which the original source may no longer exist. > On 23 Jan 2019, at 15:11, Simon Willnauer wrote: > > Hey folks, > > tl;dr; I want to be

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8638) Remove deprecated code in master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750191#comment-16750191 ] Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8638: --- I opened LUCENE-8656 for deprecations in FuzzyQuery >

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8656) Deprecations in FuzzyQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-8656: -- Attachment: LUCENE-8656.patch > Deprecations in FuzzyQuery > -- > >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8099) Deprecate CustomScoreQuery, BoostedQuery and BoostingQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750180#comment-16750180 ] Gérald Quaire commented on LUCENE-8099: --- Thanks [~romseygeek]. I have created the ticket:

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8656) Deprecations in FuzzyQuery

Alan Woodward created LUCENE-8656: - Summary: Deprecations in FuzzyQuery Key: LUCENE-8656 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8656 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8655) No possibility to access to the underlying "valueSource" of a FunctionScoreQuery

Gérald Quaire created LUCENE-8655: - Summary: No possibility to access to the underlying "valueSource" of a FunctionScoreQuery Key: LUCENE-8655 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8655

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8099) Deprecate CustomScoreQuery, BoostedQuery and BoostingQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750157#comment-16750157 ] Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8099: --- {quote}Should I create a ticket for that? {quote} Please

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-11) - Build # 3443 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.x-Linux/3443/ Java: 64bit/jdk-11 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.legacy.TestNumericRangeQuery64 Error Message: The test or suite printed 13142 bytes to stdout and stderr,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13072) Management of markers for nodeLost / nodeAdded events is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750138#comment-16750138 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-13072: Commit

[GitHub] iverase commented on issue #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

iverase commented on issue #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#issuecomment-456846458 I have decided to refractor the triangles method in EdgeTree. I think now they are much clear as the spatial logic has been moved to the subclasses.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8635) Lazy loading Lucene FST offheap using mmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750135#comment-16750135 ] Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-8635: -- {quote}we can simply change readBytes to below: {quote}

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

Hi, As we agreed some time ago I'd like to start on releasing 8.0. The branch is already created so we can start the process anytime now. Unless there are objections I'd like to start the feature freeze next week in order to build the first candidate the week after. We'll also need a 7.7 release

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8099) Deprecate CustomScoreQuery, BoostedQuery and BoostingQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750093#comment-16750093 ] Gérald Quaire commented on LUCENE-8099: --- [~romseygeek],   In the context of migrating some Solr

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13072) Management of markers for nodeLost / nodeAdded events is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750079#comment-16750079 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-13072: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13072) Management of markers for nodeLost / nodeAdded events is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750064#comment-16750064 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-13072: Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8630) Allow boosting of particular interval sources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward resolved LUCENE-8630. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Jim and I discussed this offline, and we came to the conclusion that

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-NightlyTests-7.x - Build # 45 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-NightlyTests-7.x/45/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ForceLeaderTest.testReplicasInLIRNoLeader Error Message: Timeout occured while waiting response from server at:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8630) Allow boosting of particular interval sources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-8630: -- Attachment: LUCENE-8630.patch > Allow boosting of particular interval sources >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8630) Allow boosting of particular interval sources

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750030#comment-16750030 ] Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8630: --- Here's an updated patch that applies on top of the

[DISCUSS] Opening old indices for reading

Hey folks, tl;dr; I want to be able to open an indexreader on an old index if the SegmentInfo version is supported and all segment codecs are available. Today that's not possible even if I port old formats to current versions. Our BWC policy for quite a while has been N-1 major versions. That's

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-12-ea+23) - Build # 72 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/72/ Java: 64bit/jdk-12-ea+23 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithDelegationTokens.testDelegationTokenRenew Error Message: expected:<200> but was:<403> Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9735) Umbrella JIRA for Auto Scaling and Cluster Management in SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750028#comment-16750028 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9735: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9735) Umbrella JIRA for Auto Scaling and Cluster Management in SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16750026#comment-16750026 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9735: --- Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-8.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 20 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Solaris/20/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestTolerantUpdateProcessorCloud Error Message: expected:<2> but was:<1> Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9735) Umbrella JIRA for Auto Scaling and Cluster Management in SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749948#comment-16749948 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9735: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9735) Umbrella JIRA for Auto Scaling and Cluster Management in SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749949#comment-16749949 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9735: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13156) Limiting field facet with certain terms via {!terms} not taking into account sorting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749886#comment-16749886 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-13156: - Interesting IIRC, this wasn't a public API, and was only

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12121) JWT Authentication plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749869#comment-16749869 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-12121: Pushed to master. Will let Jenkins work on it for a while and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12121) JWT Authentication plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749862#comment-16749862 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-12121: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13155) CLI tool for testing autoscaling suggestions against a live cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749848#comment-16749848 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-13155: -- This patch implements a tool for getting the current

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-13155) CLI tool for testing autoscaling suggestions against a live cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrzej Bialecki updated SOLR-13155: - Attachment: SOLR-13155.patch > CLI tool for testing autoscaling suggestions against a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13029) Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be configured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749806#comment-16749806 ] Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029: - hah, I wasn't suggesting automating that.. just how I manually tested

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-13029) Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be configured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Owen updated SOLR-13029: Attachment: SOLR-13029.patch > Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be configured >

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250101885 ## File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/EdgeTree.java ## @@ -158,6 +212,61 @@ private Relation

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250136513 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Tessellator.java ## @@ -723,13 +735,23 @@ private

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250104177 ## File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/EdgeTree.java ## @@ -101,6 +101,60 @@ public Relation

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250130909 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Rectangle2D.java ## @@ -148,6 +148,90 @@ public

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250126904 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Rectangle2D.java ## @@ -148,6 +148,90 @@ public

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250142208 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/LatLonShapeQuery.java ## @@ -163,17 +186,24 @@

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250132342 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Rectangle2D.java ## @@ -148,6 +148,90 @@ public

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250140096 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/LatLonShapeQuery.java ## @@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ *

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250132578 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Rectangle2D.java ## @@ -148,6 +148,90 @@ public

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250108261 ## File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/EdgeTree.java ## @@ -101,6 +101,60 @@ public Relation

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250101242 ## File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/EdgeTree.java ## @@ -101,6 +101,60 @@ public Relation

[GitHub] jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains

jpountz commented on a change in pull request #546: LUCENE-8620: LatLonShape contains URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/546#discussion_r250129373 ## File path: lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/Rectangle2D.java ## @@ -216,6 +300,11 @@ private

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2271 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/2271/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderVoteWaitTimeoutTest.testMostInSyncReplicasCanWinElection Error Message: IOException occured when talking to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13156) Limiting field facet with certain terms via {!terms} not taking into account sorting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749719#comment-16749719 ] superman369 commented on SOLR-13156: I met the issue and thanks for the post.  I want to know that