Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

+1 On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:20, Gora Mohanty wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP >>> Geospatial Softwar

Re: Welcome Jim Ferenczi to the PMC

Congrats Jim! On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Jim! > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 10:18, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Jim Ferenczi has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Jim! > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:05:17.701417] On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:26 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:36:22.387901] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Please vote for release can

Re: Release 7.1

+1! On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:09 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 to get 7.1 out! >> >> Le lun. 9 oct. 2017 à 17:54, Shalin Shekhar Mangar a >> écrit : >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> The 7.0 release took muc

Re: lucene-solr:branch_6_6: LUCENE-7869: Changed MemoryIndex to sort 1d points.

Thanks for noticing this Alan! I've reverted the changes to this file and then re-added the entry to CHANGES.txt in two separate commits. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:23 PM Martijn v Groningen < martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, this is a mistake. Let me fix this. > >

Re: lucene-solr:branch_6_6: LUCENE-7869: Changed MemoryIndex to sort 1d points.

Yes, this is a mistake. Let me fix this. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:16 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > There’s a few unrelated edits to CHANGES.txt here which I think might be a > mistake? > > > On 8 Jun 2017, at 11:23, m...@apache.org wrote: > > > > Repository: lucene-solr > > Updated Branches: > > re

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC5

+1 SUCCESS! [1:22:57.327825] On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:39 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:05:04.157336] > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 5 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 > > > > The ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:26.225331] On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:43 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0The artifacts can be > downloaded > from:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.0-RC3-revbfb1e

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Thanks, I've pushed the change to the 6.6 branch. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure Martijn, please go ahead. Thanks. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen < > martijn.v.gronin...@gmail

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Hi Ishan, I like to backport LUCENE-7810 to the 6.6 branch. Is that okay with you? Martijn On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Adrien! +1 for the LUCENE-7847 merge. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:16:42.421075] On 24 March 2017 at 17:11, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Lucene changes, docs and javadocs look good. The smoke tester passed for > me (I’ve lost the timing, sorry, was like 28 minutes). > > Solr’s HTML changes, docs and javadocs have moved online (see SOLR-9450), > an

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.1.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:40:22.702419] On 14 June 2016 at 02:39, Steve Rowe wrote: > I’ve committed fixes for all three problems. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > > Smoke tester was happy: SUCCESS! [0:23:40.900240] > > > > Except for the below

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.1.0

+1 On 2 June 2016 at 14:52, Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome! On 5 April 2016 at 01:35, Karl Wright wrote: > Thanks to all for the warm welcome!! I am honored to be a part of this > team. > > Karl > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi < > koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com> wrote: > >> Welcome Karl! >> >> Koji >> >> >> On 2016/04/04 23:28

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for doing this Nick! SUCCESS! [0:40:21.687836] On 1 April 2016 at 22:44, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53

Re: [VOTE] Move trunk to Java 8

+1 On 12 September 2014 17:48, Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ryan Ernst wrote: > > It has been 6 months since Java 8 was released. It has proven to be > > both stable (no issues like with the initial release of java 7) and > > faster. And there are a ton of fea

Re: [VOTE] 4.9.0

+1 all test pass. Lets close the vote. Op 23 jun. 2014 09:19 schreef "Adrien Grand" : > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:43:52.973702] > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > Artifacts here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_9_0_r1604085/ > > > > Here's my +1 >

Re: 4.9

+1 On 13 June 2014 14:06, Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > Joel Bernstein > Search Engineer at Heliosearch > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 20

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr release 4.8.1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:12:07.466713] On 17 May 2014 06:05, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [2:30:42.364774] > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have created a release candidate at >> http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_8_

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:38:57.708807] On 26 March 2014 13:11, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:13.965589] > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > Please vote for the first Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1. > > > > Download it here: > > < > http://people.apa

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

Simon, I'll fix the typo in CHANGES.txt and also move the issue under optimisations as Robert suggested. On 21 February 2014 14:24, Uwe Schindler wrote: > SUCCESS! [2:00:24.392734] > > One thing we should fix in the future: The MANIFEST.MF of almost all JAR > files contains the following line:

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [1:52:31.345809] Only spotted a small docs typo in the Lucene CHANGES.txt, the second issue under "Changes in Runtime Behavior" should be LUCENE-5399 instead of LUCENE-4399. On 21 February 2014 02:50, Mark Miller wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:05:52.694842] > > - Mark > > http://abou

Re: Welcome Benson Margulies as Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Benson! On 28 January 2014 16:19, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: > Welcome on board! > > Wolfgang. > > On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > > Good to have you aboard! > > > > Erick > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Mark Miller > wrote: > >> Welcome! > >> > >> - Mark

Re: Welcome Areek Zillur as Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Areek! On 23 January 2014 01:39, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome, Areek! > > koji > -- > http://soleami.com/blog/mahout-and-machine-learning- > training-course-is-here.html > > > (14/01/22 4:26), Robert Muir wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Areek Zillur has accepted to join our

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0 Take 3

+1 a happy smoker: SUCCESS! [1:35:43.581808] On 19 November 2013 18:35, Shai Erera wrote: > +1 smoke tester happy. > > Shai > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> - >> To un

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0"

+1! The smoker test succeeded. On 14 November 2013 15:09, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > >> SUCCESS! [2:50:09.253204] () > > however we have the usual > > >> ***WARNING***: javadocs want to fail! > > for Solr (which IMHO we should fix) > > Regards, > Tommaso > > > > 2013/11/14 Shai Erera >

Re: Welcome Ryan Ernst as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ryan! On 14 October 2013 20:13, Ryan Ernst wrote: > Thanks Adrian. > > I grew up in Bakersfield, CA (colloquially known as "the armpit of > California"). I escaped and went to Cal Poly for my bachelors in computer > science, and after a very brief stint working on HPUX, I landed workin

Re: Welcome Joel Bernstein

Welcome Joel! On 3 October 2013 15:45, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 10/2/2013 11:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > The Lucene PMC is happy to welcome Joel Bernstein as a committer on the > Lucene and Solr project. Joel has been working on a number of issues on > the project and we look forward to

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC5

+1 smoke tester is happy. On 30 September 2013 14:37, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1, smoke tester is happy. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote to release the following artifacts: > > > http://people

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC2

+1 smoker is also happy on my end On 25 September 2013 08:55, Adrien Grand wrote: > Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward > compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221). > > Please vote to release the following artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/sta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0

+1 Smoke tester passes On 19 September 2013 11:47, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good. > > Steve > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0 > ar

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3179 - Still Failing!

oops :) I see that now after checking the commit! On 23 August 2013 14:56, Robert Muir wrote: > the bug was not in the test, the test found a bug in slow wrapper itself! > :) > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Martijn v Groningen > wrote: > > Thanks for fixing this tes

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3179 - Still Failing!

Thanks for fixing this test bug! On 22 August 2013 16:11, Robert Muir wrote: > I committed a fix: slowwrapper bug > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server > wrote: > > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/3179/ > > Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_25 -XX:+Us

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On 1 August 2013 09:06, Adrien Grand wrote: > Welome Cassandra! > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFi lterTest.java

True, I misunderstood Robert and_TestUtil#randomRealisticUnicodeString(random). I will change the test. Thanks for pointing this out to me. On 16 July 2013 23:12, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : This should fix this, b/c value2 (one extra character) will always be > : different than value1. The te

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.4

+1 Smoker ran successful On 16 July 2013 17:36, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > Smoke tester is happy on mac. > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Please vote to release Lucene and Solr 4.4, built off revision 1503555 of >>

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFilterTest.java

This should fix this, b/c value2 (one extra character) will always be different than value1. The test initially failed b/c value1 and value2 were equal. On 16 July 2013 21:37, Robert Muir wrote: > Does this really fix this or just make it less likely to happen...? > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at

Re: svn commit: r1503837 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/queries/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queries/TermFilterTest.java

Just did this... On 16 July 2013 21:19, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > Maybe remove the System.out? > > Uwe > > > > m...@apache.org schrieb: >> >> Author: mvg >> Date: Tue Jul 16 19:15:24 2013 >> New Revision: 1503837 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1503837 >> Log: >> LUCENE-5088: Fix

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b96) - Build # 6593 - Failure!

I'll fix. On 16 July 2013 21:05, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/6593/ > Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b96 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: org.apache.lucene.queries.TermFilterTest.testHashCod

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.3-Java6 - Build # 104 - Still Failing

I'll look into this one. On 25 June 2013 01:40, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.3-Java6/104/ > > 1 tests failed. > REGRESSION: > org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoinSorting.testNestedSorting > > Error Message: > expected:<3> but was

Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.1 RC1

+1 Smoker ran successful as well. On 12 June 2013 21:24, Simon Willnauer wrote: > +1 > > I upgraded Elasticsearch and all tests pass. Smoketester is happy too > > simon > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -Yonik >> http://lucidworks.com >> >> On Mon, Jun 10

Re: Welcome Han Jiang as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Han! On 8 June 2013 17:50, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 6/8/2013 4:01 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Han Jiang has accepted to join our ranks > > as a committer. > > Welcome to the project, Han! > > - Shawn > > >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89) - Build # 5736 - Still Failing!

Committed a fix for this. Hopefully it doesn't fail any more. On 23 May 2013 23:14, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5736/ > Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC > > 1 tests failed. > REGRESSION:

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.3 RC4

+1 Smoke tester passed. On 30 April 2013 20:38, Steve Rowe wrote: > Thanks Adrien. > > I re-ran the smoke tester and it passed this time. > > +1 to release RC4. > > Steve > > On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Steve Rowe w

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 5334 - Failure!

his should be a noop for > this > > merge policy? > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 5334 - Failure!

I looked into a previous failure of this test and committed a fix for that. I think that fix caused this failure. In the fix I use of the NoMergePolicy and this seems to break the assert in the RandomIndexWriter#doRandomForceMerge() method. On 28 April 2013 19:17, Michael McCandless wrote: > I t

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 246 - Still Failing

I'm looking into this failure. On 26 April 2013 12:01, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/246/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: > org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoinSorting.testNestedSorting > > Error Message: > expected:<3> b

Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.0 RC3

+1, smoker is happy On 24 April 2013 10:03, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1, smoke tests pass. > > Tommaso > > > 2013/4/23 Simon Willnauer > >> Here is a new RC candidate... >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC3-rev1470846/ >> >> here is my +1 >> >> thanks fo

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1

+1 The smoker tester ran successful! On 19 April 2013 08:18, Simon Willnauer wrote: > > http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/ > > Thanks everybody for the hard work! > > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! > Integration into ES is successful! > > there is my +1

Re: Welcome Shalin Shekhar Mangar to the PMC

Congrats Shalin! On 6 April 2013 00:54, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 4/4/2013 12:24 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Shalin Shekhar Mangar has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> > > Congratulations, Shalin! > > > > --**---

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand to the PMC

Welcome Adrien :) On 29 March 2013 08:49, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Seems like you have those release voting rights now after all :) > Congratulations. > > Dawid > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.2.1 RC2

+1 The smokeReleaseTest again ran successfully. On 27 March 2013 16:09, Adrien Grand wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller > wrote: > > Is that a +1 ? :) > > That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the > counting easier since I have no binding vote (not bein

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.2.1

+1 The smokeTestRelease script ran successful On 26 March 2013 08:53, Simon Willnauer wrote: > Upgrade ES to 4.2.1 - all tests pass > > +1 > > thanks mark for rolling this release! > > simon > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mark Miller > wrote: > > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/luce

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1

+1! The smoke test ran successful. On 17 January 2013 17:38, Steve Rowe wrote: > Sorry, Christian, I should have pointed to the JIRA issue for the "apache-" > prefix removal: > - Steve > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Tha

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

+1 Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. On 21 December 2012 01:07, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc > errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 > javadocs run aft

Re: Welcome Sami Siren to the PMC

Welcome Sami! On 13 December 2012 17:17, Simon Willnauer wrote: > welcome! > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Sami Siren wrote: >> Thanks guys for the warm welcome. It's great to be back ;) >> >> -- >> Sami Siren >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: >>> >>> Congratu

Re: Welcome Alan Woodward as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Alan! On 17 October 2012 10:04, Alan Woodward wrote: > Thanks Robert. > > I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search > engines for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly > using closed-source implementations, and discovering lucene/solr

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)

+1 On 10 October 2012 05:23, Yonik Seeley wrote: > +1 > > -Yonik > http://lucidworks.com > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir wrote: >> artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 >> >> Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found >> test bugs and other b

Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)

+1 smoke tester is also happy on my machine. Martijn On 27 September 2012 21:16, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> artifacts are here: http://

Re: VOTE: release 4.0

+1, Smoker tester also ran successfully on my machine (Ubuntu 12.04.1) Martijn On 24 September 2012 14:48, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1, smoke tester is happy on Ubuntu 12.04. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert Muir wrote: >> Ar

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 608 - Failure

Committed a fix for this. On 9 September 2012 21:31, Michael McCandless wrote: > This failure reproduces ... I'm not sure what's up ... > > ant test -Dtestcase=GroupFacetCollectorTest -Dtests.method=testRandom > -Dtests.seed=115039C6A89AE1D1 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.slow=true > -Dtests.local

Re: VOTE: 4.0-BETA

+1 SmokeTestRelease.py ran successfully. On 7 August 2012 05:32, Robert Muir wrote: > Artifacts here: > http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0bRC0-rev1370099/ > > The list of changes since 4.0-ALPHA is pretty large: lots of important > bugs were fixed. > > This passes the sm

Re: ToParentBlockJoinQuery vs filtered search

ng, but I'm not really sure that it's needed for > anyone. > > Could you please provide feedback for the latest patch, and/or move it forth > or back? > > Regards > >> by Martijn v Groningen-2 on Feb 06, 2012; 7:57pm >> URL: >> http://lucene.4720

Re: Move ValueSourceFilter to query module?

+1 Good idea. I think that there also should be other implementations for the different primitive types. Maybe the inclusive or exclusive filtering can be a boolean option? Martijn On 23 July 2012 19:37, Smiley, David W. wrote: > In the spatial utils package I've got a ValueSourceFilter which is

Re: svn commit: r1363272 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/LuceneTestCase.java

> That is wanted! We want to test SlowMultiReaderWrapper and verify that it > really behaves like a full conformant AtomicReader. Because of that we > sometimes war with it. The fix Robert did is fine and is identical to the one > we did in the past. As this is no real Lucene usage pattern, not

Re: svn commit: r1363272 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/LuceneTestCase.java

Thanks for also taking a look at the test failures! On 20 July 2012 19:14, Robert Muir wrote: > Hi Martinj: thanks for looking into this! > > I think have a better fix for these: > > the problem is actually in the AssertingAtomicReaders that > AssertingDirectoryReader wraps its subreaders with. >

Re: FieldCache goes insane in JoinUtils

I tried to reproduce the failure on my local machine, but the test didn't fail: ant test -Dtestcase=TestJoinUtil -Dtests.method=testSingleValueRandomJoin -Dtests.seed=4613CDE1DF5391F -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.linedocsfile=/var/lib/jenkins/lucene-data/enwiki

Re: Welcome Greg Bowyer

Welcome! On 21 June 2012 13:09, Sami Siren wrote: > Welcome Greg! > > -- >  Sami Siren > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Erick Erickson > wrote: >> I'm pleased to announce that Greg Bowyer has been added as a >> Lucene/Solr committer. >> >> Greg: >> It's a tradition that you reply with a bri

Re: Grouping - Boosting large groups

I assumed using the queries module, which isn't in 3.x. After a look at the 3.x codebase this doesn't seem to be a problem. Since all the classes you need are in: o.a.l.search.function package inside core Lucene. You can use the CustomScoreQuery & ValueSourceQuery instead of the BoostedQuery. Mart

Re: Grouping - Boosting large groups

Hi Corwin, This not yet possible out of the box. However I think it is possible: 1) Create a Lucene collector that counts for all groups the number of document that match. This collector will basically compute a map with the group value as key and a count as value 2) Run this collector as an extra

Re: Welcome Adrien Grand as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On 7 June 2012 22:16, Smiley, David W. wrote: > Welcome Adrien! > ~ David > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Adrien Grand has joined our ranks as a >> committer. >> >> He has been contributing various patches to Lucene/Solr, recent

Re: remove "via"

+1 to remove the via. If someone has done work other then reviewing and committing then he could add himself as one of the author (Order is important; contributor first then committer. Depending on the work done). Maybe the contributors that have contributed in a release can also be highlighted in

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)

+1. I ran the smokeTestRelease script successfully and everything looks fine to me. Martijn On 7 April 2012 12:31, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 (tested on 2 different machines, Mac OSX 10.6/10.7) > Tommaso > > > 2012/4/6 Robert Muir > >> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >> >> I t

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6

Hi, A few days ago Cody Young discovered a bug in Solr's distributed grouping (SOLR-3316). This bug also occurs in the 3x code. I attached a bug fix in the issue. I think it is an important bug fix. Can I commit the fix to branch3x or is it already too late? Martijn On 6 April 2012 13:35, Robert

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

> > Early days of electronic text and a math professor I had had a colleague > who submitted a math textbook. Someone decided that "iff" was a typo > and did a mass substitution of "if". As my prof said > > "Going through a math text and putting back all the iff's that were > supposed to be in the

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

we should open an > issue to fix this confusion? > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Martijn v Groningen > wrote: > > On 23 March 2012 14:06, Robert Muir wrote: > >> > >> I agree, and if its really important for some reason to document > >> something as &

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

On 23 March 2012 14:06, Robert Muir wrote: > I agree, and if its really important for some reason to document > something as "if and only if", I think we should write it out > completely and avoid specialized abbreviations. > +1 I Completely agree. Martijn

Re: svn commit: r1304320 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java

I don't know. I wasn't aware that "iff" has a meaning. I'll change it back if it is: "if and only if". Martijn On 23 March 2012 13:57, Robert Muir wrote: > Is this a typo or intended to be iff (if and only if)? > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:50 AM, wrote: > > Author: mvg > > Date: Fri Mar 23 1

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3265) TestSolrEntityProcessorEndToEnd fails if you have a running Solr instance

:-) If I run the tests on my personal macbook it also takes a very very very long time to complete. This macbook is 5 years old... Luckily I do have another faster machine. On 22 March 2012 15:00, Erick Erickson wrote: > No, I have an OS X about 3 years old. Sometimes in only feels like > a

Re: 3.6 branching

> > I propose for 3.6 that we don't create a release branch but just use > our branch_3x as the release branch. We can 'svn mv' it to > 'lucene_solr_3_6' when the release is ready. > > Normally we would branch and open up branch_3x as 3.7 for changes, but > from previous discussions we intend to re

Re: Java 1.6 EOL

Maybe some time after the 4.x branch is created, the trunk can move to Java 7? 3.x branch supports Java 5, 4.x and current trunk support Java 6. Seems natural to me that the future 5.x and future trunk would support Java 7... Martijn On 16 March 2012 15:50, Erick Erickson wrote: > OK, that sett

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 12754 - Failure

I committed a fix for this. Martijn On 15 March 2012 12:11, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12754/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log (for compile errors): > [...truncated 15069 lines...] > > > > > -

Re: TestStressNRT failures.

I also don't get any failures. I ran the test on a linux box (latest checkout) and with -Dtests.iter=1000 Martijn On 8 March 2012 13:45, Erick Erickson wrote: > Not a linux box, but -Dtests.iter=1000 and no failures on my > Macbook Pro. > > FWIW > Erick > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Dawid

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 12658 - Failure

I committed a fix for this. Martijn On 8 March 2012 11:11, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12658/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log (for compile errors): > [...truncated 4672 lines...] >[junit] >[junit] - Stand

Re: Plans to add functions to results of groups

I haven't seen an issue describing this. Something like this was available in the SOLR-236 patches, but never got committed. I started to create a second pass collector that counts the distinct values of a particular field for the top N groups in LUCENE-3444. I think there might be a need for a mo

Re: ideas for alphas/betas?

Seems like a good idea to me. Martijn On 6 March 2012 07:42, Shai Erera wrote: > I agree. > > Maybe we should also tag issues as 4.0-alpha, 4.0-beta in JIRA? For > 4.0-alpha we'll tag all the issues that are expected to change the index > format, and 4.0-beta all the issues that require API cha

Re: pending backports for 3.6

+1! On 6 March 2012 07:35, Shai Erera wrote: > I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and >> create branch_4x to work towards a 4.0 beta (this is March 2012). >> > > +1. > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Can we get any pending is

Re: Welcome Stefan Matheis

Welcome Stefan! Martijn On 29 February 2012 22:14, Sami Siren wrote: > Welcome Stefan! > -- > Sami Siren > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apac

Re: FieldCache future?

>> Grouping etc could work solely on a docvalues api and maybe they have >> a special ctor to take a SortedBytes impl (and fieldcache implements >> the docvalues api or some other backwards mechanism). >> This would remove the redundant implementations (both fieldcache and >> DV implementations) in

Re: Welcome Sami Siren as committer

Welcome Sami! Martijn On 19 February 2012 19:24, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Congratulations Sami! > Dawid > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Shai Erera wrote: >> Welcome ! >> >> Shai >> >> On Feb 19, 2012 6:44 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote: >>> >>> Welcome aboard! >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10

Re: [important] Refactoring of tests infrastructure.

Nice work! I also like the ant test-help target (I also forget the test options quite often). Are all options going to be specified in there? I don't see the tests.iter option. Martijn On 17 February 2012 20:17, Mark Miller wrote: > Sweet. > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Dawid Weiss > w

Re: Welcome Christian Moen as committer

Welcome Christian! Martijn On 14 February 2012 23:01, Michael McCandless wrote: > Welcome Christian! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> I'm pleased to announce that Christian Moen has joined our ranks as a >> commit

Re: Welcome Jan Høydahl to the PMC

Congrats Jan! Op 13 feb. 2012 15:53 schreef "Shai Erera" het volgende: > Welcome Jan ! > > Shai > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that Jan has accepted the PMC's invitation to >> join. >> >> Congratulations Jan! >> >> -- >> lucidima

Re: Welcome James Dyer

Welcome! On 10 February 2012 14:18, Chris Male wrote: > Welcome > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> >> Welcome James! >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll >> wrote: >> > I'm pleased to

Re: Changing our Wiki software?

+1 for confluence! But I don't know how we can easily move the moin moin content to confluence... Martijn On 8 February 2012 04:28, Joe Cabrera wrote: > On 02/07/2012 09:09 PM, Mark Miller wrote: >> >> As long as I'm talking about possible improvements I'd like to work on: >> >> Anyone else have

Re: Welcome Dawid Weiss to the Lucene/Solr PMC

Congratulations Dawid! On 8 February 2012 08:44, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Thank you guys, I'm truly honored. > > Dawid > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >> I'm please to announce that Dawid has accepted the PMC's invitation to join. >> >> Welcome Dawid! >> >> - Mark Miller >> lu

Re: Welcome Martijn van Groningen to the Lucene PMC

Thanks guys! I'm really delighted. @Erick Sure! There is lots of open source work to do. Martijn On 8 February 2012 08:44, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Congratulations Martijn. > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Shai Erera wrote: >> Congrats Martijn! >> >> Shai >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:23 AM

Re: [JENKINS] Solr-3.x - Build # 592 - Failure

Committed a fix. On 7 February 2012 23:06, Martijn v Groningen wrote: > Oops my fault. Javadoc error. > > On 7 February 2012 23:04, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: >> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/592/ >> >> No tests ran. >> >> Build

Re: [JENKINS] Solr-3.x - Build # 592 - Failure

Oops my fault. Javadoc error. On 7 February 2012 23:04, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/592/ > > No tests ran. > > Build Log (for compile errors): > [...truncated 19887 lines...] > > > > -

Re: ToParentBlockJoinQuery vs filtered search

Hi Mikhail, There is already an issue open for supporting block join in Solr: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076 Maybe you can attach your work in that issue and we can iterate from there. Martijn On 6 February 2012 14:54, Michael McCandless wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:43

  1   2   >