[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13437732#comment-13437732
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Could be me - but I'm missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13437739#comment-13437739
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Also help me understanding a bit
Twitter account while at it :)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I'm terrible with social media- is there any way to have tweets directed
at @LuceneDotNet sent to one of our mailing lists? Or should I just get on
top of monitoring it more often
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13437943#comment-13437943
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
Alright, last question (probably
Itamar, when you're happy with the tests and code, let me know, I'll re-cut the
RC for core and contrib
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:05:39 +0300
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1375282 -
/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/core/Util/Parameter.cs
From: ita...@code972.com
To:
Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it to
the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't
at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it
to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand
Hey Zach - thats excellent. If you want to consider it start by creating a jira
issue and attaching your patch.
Well take a look at it for possible inclusion -
Prescott
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Zachary Gramana
Sent: 8/17/2012 4:47 PM
To:
. But that's a
great news :)
Congrats to everyone!!
Simone
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Michael Herndon
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote:
can we post this on twitter?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hey All -
Just an FYI
Hey All -
Just an FYI, the board voted unanimously to allow us to graduate. I will push
forward with the various tasks in the next week.
Congrats to everyone who has helped us get this far -
~Prescott
It'd be nice to understand where this issue is coming from as it wasn't in
2.9.4 rather than jumping to a quick fix imo. I'll dig a bit myself
~P
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:32:29 +0200
From: si...@devhost.se
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net 3.0.3 and medium trust
usually the project files that are backwards compatible not
the solution files. So you need a solution for each vs version but should
be able to keep the proj files the same.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Yes
Sent from my Windows
I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date.
Anything in trunk should be there
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Christopher Currens
Sent: 8/8/2012 1:35 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues
, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date.
Anything in trunk should be there
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Christopher Currens
Sent: 8/8/2012 1:35 PM
To: lucene-net
I use VS2010 and they opened fine for me to cut the pre-release nuget packages.
I'll try to take a in the next day or two to see if I can't move that back to a
VS2010 package.
I wouldn't have an issue with a VS2012 solution file - as long as it was in
VS2012 build folder, not the VS2010
I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility - hopefully
that gets some people excited
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene.Net+3.0.3
Please update the wiki and the changes.TXT file with any changes you're aware
of - I will take some time this weekend to comb through everything and add
whatever is missing
From:
@lucene.apache.org
Prescott - we could make an RC and push it to Nuget as a PreRelease, to get
real feedback.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I don't think we ever fully adopted the style guidelines, probably not a
terrible discussion to have
Actually that's a good point, I don't think mercurial is an option for apache
software projects - but I know git was rolled out over the last year as an
option
Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
From: zgram...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012
I don't think we ever fully adopted the style guidelines, probably not a
terrible discussion to have. As for this release, I think that by lazy
consensus we should branch the trunk at the end of this weekend (say monday),
and begin the process of cutting a release. - my $.02 below
1) Usage
.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just wanted to check in - where do we feel like we stand? What is
left
to
do - is there anything I can help with specifically? I'll have some
spare
cycles this weekend. I want to really make
Did I miss the email where Itamar actually said And for heaven's sake, can we
move to git when graduating? I think I did. I'll add it to the list of things
to discuss as we progress. I believe we discussed this in the past and at the
time we had a lazy consensus to stick with svn.
Subject:
There are two packages Lucene packages on nuget that are depreciated. With some
updates nuget made a while ago, we have the ability to remove those packages.
Do we want to?
Stefan or Benson, if you could sign off on the report - due tomorrow. Thanks,~P
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Incubator Report
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:34:49 -0700
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2012
I'll also be progressing us
fyi
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:58:23 -0700
The vote passes with the following +1's (these of course are in
There was a commit for updating the build scripts - is there a command I can
run to output both 4.0 and 3.5 binaries of everything?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-446:
--
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.6
Assignee: Prescott Nasser
Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13419915#comment-13419915
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-446:
---
I changed most
...well, difficult to maintain by hand since visual studio
doesn't allow you to set different framework versions per configuration,
and visual studio seemed to be having trouble with references, since both
frameworks were being referenced.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx
I've called a vote on the general incubator for our graduation:
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:40:53 -0700
Hey all,
The
I started doing and would want to
complete, and also sign off on the suspected corruption issue we raised.
I'm afraid I won't have much time this week to properly do all that, but
I'll keep you posted.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Alright
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13414471#comment-13414471
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Chris if you have the code
, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Have at it.
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:20:06 -0700
Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
If it's alright with you
...@devhost.se wrote:
The tests that failed when using culture=sv-se seems fixed.
On 2012-07-08 20:44, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
What's the status on the failing tests we had?
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Three issues left that I see
of progress I can make, since I have some time right now.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I made some progress on 480 - checked into the 3.5 branch, there is more
work to be done we could potentially move it to 3.0.3, but I put it into
3.5
Hey All,
This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project
(incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to
see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project.
Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe
.
Whatever more you can add would be great
~P
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406105#comment-13406105
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-498:
---
Google Translate:
I embarked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406106#comment-13406106
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-498:
---
Marcelo - have you tried
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13400113#comment-13400113
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-456:
---
'build copy-release all release
I just named it 3.5 becuase that's what we have on our roadmap. I believe
you're right though, we should just target 3.6
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:15 +0300
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1353075 -
/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/
From: ita...@code972.com
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-497.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done, thanks for the heads up
misspelling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-497.
-
Assignee: Prescott Nasser
misspelling of sound-alike word on http
-- Task 470, a non-serious one, is listed only because it's mostly done and
just need a few loose ends tied up. I'll hopefully have time to take care
of that this weekend.
How many GetX/SetX are left? I did a quick search for 'public * Get*()' Most of
them looked to be actual methods -
looks like the same .net runtime will be in windows phone 8 and windows 8 -
might save us porting issues for mobile..
one of those if it's running on WP8.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
looks like the same .net runtime will be in windows phone 8 and windows 8
- might save us porting issues for mobile..
How much are you trying to port? I've got it on my roadmap to work with sharpen
to try and get most of it auto ported. Any porting help is of course
appreciated and welcome - but if you so have some time and are so inclined we
could use more people helping on the sharpen front.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-480:
--
Attachment: SortedSet.cs
Investigate what needs to happen to make both .NET
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393683#comment-13393683
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
I agree, I'd prefer to leave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393683#comment-13393683
]
Prescott Nasser edited comment on LUCENENET-480 at 6/18/12 6:30 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393437#comment-13393437
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
ISetT set = new HashSetT(x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393447#comment-13393447
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-337:
---
Is this still wanted in 3.0.3
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template
Stefan, I think you've more than proved your value.
+1
seem much different from the role he's already
been involved in. Any objections?
Thanks,
Christopher
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template
Stefan, I think you've more
Agreed -
JIRA for 3.0.3
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316215#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
We should evaluate all of these - fix them, mark as won't fix, or move them to
another release version. I think the biggest
best for Chris to wrap up the work he has started
Anyone else on board to close some tickets?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Agreed -
JIRA for 3.0.3
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316215#selectedTab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295135#comment-13295135
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Attempting to compile the trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13295406#comment-13295406
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-480:
---
Yes I think we should do
Does anyone have a good reference for the limitations this will have? What
libraries won't be accessible, etc?
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Metro port of Lucene.net
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:34:05 -0700
I haven't taken too much time to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-483.
-
Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another
one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-483:
-
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
Spatial Search skipping records when one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-483.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved per comments
Spatial Search skipping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-489:
-
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
New spatial module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-488.
-
Can't open IndexReader, get OutOFMemory Exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-488.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Intended - see comments by Sven for more details
Prescott Nasser created LUCENENET-491:
-
Summary: Win 8 Metro Limitations
Key: LUCENENET-491
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-491
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13285755#comment-13285755
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-484:
---
Has anyone had any luck with any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-491:
--
Description:
Ensure that Lucene.Net library can run in Metro
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-462.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Itamar Syn-Hershko
Resolved with the new module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-462.
-
Spatial Search skipping records with small radius e.g. 1 mile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-489.
---
Resolution: Fixed
New spatial module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-489.
-
New spatial module
--
Key: LUCENENET-489
Prescott Nasser created LUCENENET-492:
-
Summary: Investigate Improvements to Sharpen for 4.0 conversion
Key: LUCENENET-492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-492
Project
Hey All, Our roster is growing a bit, I'd like to welcome Simon as a new
committer. Simon has been quite active on the user mailing list helping answer
community questions, he also maintains a C# port of the lucene-hunspell project
(java: http://code.google.com/p/lucene-hunspell/, Simons
I'll try to give you a hand this weekend great work ~P
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 05:48:51 +0300
Subject: Re: Spatial4n
From: ita...@code972.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Status update:
The Spatial4j project is completely ported to .NET, including tests, all of
which green. It
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2012 I've updated it - feel free to adjust
it (or if you don't have access, let me know, I'm happy to make changes) ~P
the relevant points:
http://s.apache.org/HZa
I don't know if Itamar ever followed up after that and filed a ICLA.
If he did, we're good and just need to commit the code.. Otherwise,
we'll need him to do the ICLA first.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx
Hey Stefan - can you confirm that porting Spatial4n is ok to include in our
contrib? It is also under the apache 2.0 license, but we wanted to be 100%. ~P
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:45:48 +0300
Subject: Spatial4n
From: ita...@code972.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Hi again,
I
I'm looking at some of the tests failing. I think it would be worthwhile having
them figured out prior to a pre-package. Figured out could just mean we know
under what conditions they fail and we can document that for now, but not yet
fixed. But I think right now they are failing and we aren't
If anyone is familiar with the CMS, something happened to the download page
(formatting is screwed up), but it's exactly like the other pages. I could use
another pair of eyes on it. ~P
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Prescott Nasser
geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
I think that was a while ago, and I don't even recall if I fully ported
it or just put up the start. I had some other stuff to deal with the last
few months, so my memory is a bit lacking. I'll review
answer a few questions there, instead of me
changing things back and forth?
Git history (I use the Git mirror, yes) tells me Prescott Nasser is behind
porting this - maybe he will have the answers?
Cheers,
Itamar.
3.0.3 started as a branch while we were releasing 2.9.4. But it was since
merged into the trunk. Where is the link? we should update it to point to the
trunk.
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:09:18 -0400
Subject: broken link to 3.0.3 on website.
From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258600#comment-13258600
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-486:
---
We could potentially add
lol
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:41:32 -0400
Subject: Re: user feedback on 3.0.3
From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
silly question. I script my tweets using powershell and my RMS-styled text
only browser built using C# where all the strings are UTF-16.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser closed LUCENENET-482.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
It's unclear if this is a bug in 2.3.2 or specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237187#comment-13237187
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-446:
---
That's really kind of buried
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237189#comment-13237189
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-463:
---
I'll try to take a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228918#comment-13228918
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-167:
---
I did a ton of work on this late
to 300MB.
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 8:45 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sharpen Error
You were right - built it into the plugin folder, but it created it's own
plugin folder
Should we remove this? It looks like it's not part of the contrib for Java
3.0.3 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/contrib/ and
we have no tests for it.
New thread.. Alex any thoughts on how I could solve the error below? The java
files copied over to the new workspace, but I think that's as far as it got.
I'll dig around myself, just asking in case you've encountered this. Thanks~P
!SESSION 2012-03-03 16:51:41.229
Jira and then just submit your own patch imo
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Stefan Bodewig
Sent: 3/1/2012 7:23 AM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
On 2012-02-29, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2012-02-28,
to work correctly
Is it safe to add content to the site through the CMS again? Anything to
be wary of or not explicitly do?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us.
Basically
Thanks Stefan!
From: bode...@apache.org
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:23:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
On 2012-03-01, Christopher Currens wrote:
I agree with Prescott. Make a patch for that sucker! :)
Done
Stefan
.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Im not against breaking compatibility when changing the version number to
a new major 2 - 3. Im not sure how others feel. Matching Java access
modifiers seems like the right move.
That said, what if we
I meant to merge, its on my to do list, might take me some time - just started
a new job
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Christopher Currens
Sent: 2/28/2012 10:36 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
Now that
I cant check them out at the moment, but what is in dist is the release. I will
check out the tag tonight
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Andy Pook
Sent: 2/27/2012 5:09 AM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4g binary
So, 2.9.4g
Im not against breaking compatibility when changing the version number to a new
major 2 - 3. Im not sure how others feel. Matching Java access modifiers seems
like the right move.
That said, what if we mark obsolete in 3.0.3 and when we make the jump to 4.0
wipe them out? In my head we
Hey All, We've got a blog up and running: https://blogs.apache.org/lucenenet/.
Right now we are taking the latest 3 articles and those are being posted onto
our main Lucene.Net as news. But I'd like to try and get more regular content
up on the blog. If you happen to write an article (or
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
