[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13906956#comment-13906956
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5460:
You mean that if the filter is wrapped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13907009#comment-13907009
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5460:
There is a TODO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13905331#comment-13905331
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5438:
I committed NRTIndexRevision and matching test
Hi
I tried to understand how do I merge changes that involve code refactoring,
e.g. class rename, from github to our SVN. I had such a need, but I also
thought about this issue, now that we accept PRs. So the scenario is this:
- In your git clone, you rename class Foo to Bar
- In order to commit
a workflow that works with the ASF mirror and svn, please
write it up on the Wiki!
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Thomas Matthijs li...@selckin.be
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, has anyone perhaps found a way to overcome that issue
anything.
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
On Feb 17, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know what's up w/ our github clone? According to this:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr, the last commit was 3 days ago...
Shai
I think you can rename _TestUtil for 4.x too - we're not obligated to any
back-compat in test-framework.
Shai
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Right, that's my target.
Might I rename _TestUtil for 5.0 :-?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM,
Hi
Does anybody know what's up w/ our github clone? According to this:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr, the last commit was 3 days ago...
Shai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13903366#comment-13903366
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5438:
I reviewed the patch and looks like it can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5440.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Committed the Solr changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13900118#comment-13900118
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5443:
I see that in Lucene45DVP, all access
Right. I can create a patch a bit later, unless someone beats me to it...
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Uwe Schindler (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13900122#comment-13900122
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5443:
Right. I can create a patch a bit later, unless
+1.
I read on the Apache page that part of the integration lets us reply to an
email from the GitHub issue, and the response is recorded on the issue.
Does that work w/ JIRA as well? I gave it a quick try and seems like it
doesn't..
Shai
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Tommaso Teofili
-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
*From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:30 AM
*To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: DISCUSS: Go all in on github integration
+1.
I read on the Apache page that part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13900170#comment-13900170
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
I reviewed how we can perhaps not break the API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5443:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5443.patch
Add AtomicLong ramBytesUsed and compute it whenever a new buffer
Hi
A while ago I decided to give git(hub) a try and forked trunk. I was able
to work on several issues in parallel (while switching branches) and all
within a single checkout and project in eclipse. It seemed to work well.
But whenever I was ready to commit the work to Apache SVN, I applied a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5443.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Shai Erera (was: Simon Willnauer)
Lucene Fields: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440-solr.patch
Patch decouples DocSet from Fixed/OpenBitSet. DocSet.setBitsOn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13897786#comment-13897786
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
I don't mind if we do it only in trunk. However
I committed a fix.
Shai
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:57 PM, buil...@flonkings.com wrote:
Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-4x-Linux-Java6-64-test-only/12501/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.search.TestSloppyPhraseQuery2.testRandomIncreasingSloppiness
Error Message:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13897949#comment-13897949
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
bq. I don't think FixedBitSet should be external
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440-solr.patch
Patch resolves an error I had w/ grouping (under Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896393#comment-13896393
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5441:
OK, but I prefer a shorter name. I see that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896717#comment-13896717
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
Committed this patch to trunk and 4x. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896944#comment-13896944
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5441:
Uwe, just a wild thought -- since you already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440-solr.patch
Patch moves solr/ code to use FixedBitSet instead of OpenBitSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440.patch
bq. Maybe if we added a FixedBitSet.ensureCapacity
You're right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895937#comment-13895937
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5441:
+1 to make the separation, I was thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13895972#comment-13895972
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5441:
Yes, a dedicated class, I would call it maybe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440.patch
New patch:
* All lucene/ code is now cut over to (Long)FixedBitSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440.patch
Added a FixedBitSetIterator class and optimization in or/and etc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896039#comment-13896039
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
I don't think we should deprecate anything. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896200#comment-13896200
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
Uwe, I added an explicit FixedBitSetIterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13896202#comment-13896202
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5440:
Fair enough, I will rename the Long version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440.patch
Patch renames to LongBitSet.
Add LongFixedBitSet and replace usage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3459.
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.7)
ChainedFilter was changed to use
Shai Erera created LUCENE-5440:
--
Summary: Add LongFixedBitSet and replace usage of OpenBitSet
Key: LUCENE-5440
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5440:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5440.patch
Attached patch contains LongFixedBitSet:
* Only set/get(long
Hi
I recently modified FixedBitSet.iterator() to return its own iterator,
instead of OpenBitSetIterator, and while I haven't done a thorough
performance test, the results on LUCENE-5425 suggested this helped in
general (even though we only tested facets). Also, last night's benchmark
for
that wouldn't hurt performance? If we replaced
get/set(int) with get/set(long) I'm not sure...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I recently modified FixedBitSet.iterator() to return its own iterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5425:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5425.patch
* I implemented FixedBitSet.iterator() to return what I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13892131#comment-13892131
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
I ran this on a 2013 Wikipedia dump w/ 6.7M docs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13892144#comment-13892144
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
John/Lei, can you please review the new patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13892363#comment-13892363
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
bq. The createHitsSet is marked as protected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5425.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Assignee: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5431:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5431.patch
Modified FSDirectory/FSLockFactory.toString() to use getSimpleName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5431.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Committed to trunk and 4x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13890892#comment-13890892
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
I think we shouldn't rush into changing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13891022#comment-13891022
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
I understand John. I wonder, if you can use
Shai Erera created LUCENE-5431:
--
Summary: Add FSLockFactory.toString()
Key: LUCENE-5431
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5431
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5431:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5431.patch
* Add toString to FSLockFactory
* Fix FilterDirectory to override
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888674#comment-13888674
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
The benchmarks that we ran were with luceneutil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888676#comment-13888676
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
bq. Shai, given that using OBS Iterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888676#comment-13888676
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-5425 at 2/1/14 7:07 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888680#comment-13888680
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
Looks good. BTW newHitSet -- is that intentional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888682#comment-13888682
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5428:
bq. Do you mean the method call overhead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888445#comment-13888445
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
If we need to make any change to the API, it has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888449#comment-13888449
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5428:
Mike and I discussed this in the past, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888451#comment-13888451
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5426:
Looks good to me. +1!
Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13888452#comment-13888452
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
Just to make sure I don't come across wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5320:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5320.patch
Patch adds a ctor to SearcherTaxoManager and tests.
Create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5320.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Assignee: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887465#comment-13887465
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5426:
I've got few questions:
* Why is this code now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887469#comment-13887469
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
The current patch's intention seems to allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887548#comment-13887548
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5425:
bq. didn't know a wrapper will affect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5367.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Assignee: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5387:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-5387.patch
Patch fixes FacetConfig.build to take and return Document. I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5387.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
5.0
Thanks Mike. Committed to 4x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878604#comment-13878604
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
Isn't it then a problem of anyone that will try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878701#comment-13878701
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
bq. First of all, some test should fail.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878719#comment-13878719
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
bq. For the short term i think we should just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878726#comment-13878726
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
OK let's fix it separately. A new Codec ... just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878764#comment-13878764
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
I guess I messed this up when working on LUCENE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878778#comment-13878778
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5377:
+1, looks good!
IW.addIndexes(Dir[]) causes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13878796#comment-13878796
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5412:
Could we change SegmentInfo.setFiles() to strip
I agree with Robert. We should leave cloning BytesRefs to whoever needs
that, and not penalize everyone else who don't need it. I must say I didn't
know I can own those BytesRefs and I clone them whenever I need to. I
think I was bitten by one of the other APIs, so I assumed returned
BytesRefs are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867495#comment-13867495
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5345:
You can try fixing the log message, I wonder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867499#comment-13867499
]
Shai Erera commented on SOLR-5621:
--
+1 for using SearcherManager. In fact, I think
Shai Erera created LUCENE-5387:
--
Summary: Improve FacetConfig.build
Key: LUCENE-5387
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5387
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13862499#comment-13862499
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5339:
Thanks Mike! Do we need to delete the branch
I tried working with git several times, every time I told myself this time
you're going to give it a serious try, and yet I kept going back to SVN
each and every time. At times I thought it's because you're too familiar
with SVN, git is probably at least as good once you'll get to master it.
But
Also: if you fork https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr today, you can
have this workflow, I think.
This is how I worked on several Lucene issues in parallel, so it works ..
sort of. The problem is that while your github changes are public, none of
this appears in the Apache SVN after I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13859394#comment-13859394
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5339:
Committed the packages changes.
Simplify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13858276#comment-13858276
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5339:
It's just that we have *.facet.taxonomy package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13858276#comment-13858276
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-5339 at 12/29/13 7:48 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13856528#comment-13856528
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5376:
bq. I think we should put it under lucene/demo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13856533#comment-13856533
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5367:
Thanks Lucien, this helps clarify the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5367:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
NoSuchElementException occurs when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13856534#comment-13856534
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5367:
If LUCENE-5339 isn't committed before we release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13856535#comment-13856535
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5339:
Few comments about package organization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13856187#comment-13856187
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5367:
Lucien, do you have a testcase which reproduces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13846204#comment-13846204
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5367:
This is strange, it means that reset() is called
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13836016#comment-13836016
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5345:
Is it mandatory to have facet/ depend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13832824#comment-13832824
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5339:
bq. Can we do something about the .writercache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13831050#comment-13831050
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5316:
bq. we could hold in an int[][]
* If we do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13830874#comment-13830874
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5316:
Thanks Mike. Looks like for the usual case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13827827#comment-13827827
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5345:
I'm not sure either if the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13827829#comment-13827829
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5345:
Or, we could modify the test to use a custom
801 - 900 of 4461 matches
Mail list logo
