How about indexing the new document(s) in memory using RAMDirectory then
calling indexWriter.AddIndexesNoOptimize for NRT master index?
DIGY
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Stewart robert_stew...@epam.comwrote:
Is it possible to add a document to more than one index at the same time,
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote:
Ok, core compiles,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html contains quite a
few blanks that I think we could easily fill. I intend to either add
some N/A or real dates where I can during the coming week.
On the IP
I've never committed any code to 2.9.4g branch before testing. So, It should
pass all the tests.
DIGY
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Does anyone have the latest 2.9.4g branch they can run the tests on - I've
done some WP7 stuff, and I'm coming up
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Andy Pook andy.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It'd be useful if There was a StopAnalyzer ctor overload that took an
IEnumerablestring and maybe the current one that takes Liststring
should
be ICollectionstring (same as internal stopWords member).
Just gives a little
http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/faceted-search-and-drill-down-lucenenet/
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, K a r n a v karunakerred...@gmail.comwrote:
How can we implement faceted search with lucene
Hi Vincent,
My first goal was to replace ArrayList, Hashtables, Enumerators etc. as
quickly as possible. Applying best practices could wait till a more cleaner
code .
The purpose for Support.Set was to have a collection that can be accessed
with indexer and also implements the method Contains.
It
[mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:15 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: digy digy
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4
Thanks. For anyone watching, the corrected clickable link is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23
+1. No pending commits.
A copy of the current trunk somewhere else(tag, branches etc.) would be good
too.
DIGY.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like we have a 'lazy consensus', in that, no one has raised any
significant objections, a few minor
. I'll make a tag prior to starting the directory changes,
but I'll commit changes to trunk.
Thanks,
Troy
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM, digy digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
+1. No pending commits.
A copy of the current trunk somewhere else(tag, branches etc.) would be
good
too
compelling reason to move
forward to 4.0 runtime for Lucene.Net.
Thanks,
Troy
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:23 PM, digy digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
After this directory layout changes; what about replacing ArrayLists,
Hashtables etc, with appropriate Generics? This would bring us very
close
It would be better to attach the patches to the issue before committing.
So others can track what is going on.
DIGY
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:20 AM, slomb...@apache.org wrote:
Author: slombard
Date: Sat Mar 12 07:20:44 2011
New Revision: 1080881
URL:
0
.Nets seem to be redundant under /src/contrib/ . It could be something
like
Analyzers
Highlighter
Similarity
...
(Maybe, we should find a different name for contrib.net. It contains
contributions specific to Lucene.Net which are not available in
Lucene.java)
DIGY
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at
Well, not really core.
Codes under Analyzer(by DIGY) can be moved to /src/contrib/analyzers (but
they are not ports from java).
The others(by M.GARSKI) are extensions to the core(something like
Lucene.Net.Core.Extensions)
DIGY
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin g...@darkinsystems.comwrote:
+1
On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote:
All,
A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for
another 4 hours (72 hours total).
So far, we have two +1 votes in.
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to all suggestions. Hudkins is my new favourite word. ;)
One quick concern I have, is how much of the things listed are already
available on the Apache hudson server? A lot of this is .NET specific, so
Hi Stefan,
* Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is
compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have
to live without generics.
* IKVM is the java world in .NET runtime in fact. If you are , for ex, to
write an analyzer, you have to
project.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi DIGY
On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote:
* Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java
is
compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will
have
No. It's Rune's work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E
DIGY
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glyn Darkin
19 matches
Mail list logo
